If you were alive in the year 326 B.C....

So it proves that 9/11 was CIA.

In the traditional Hindu calendars (“Samvats”), you’d say it was 2776 or 2777 depending on what time of the year it was (it begins with the last epoch, or in 3102 BC). There are also names for the years which repeat every 60 years, but I don’t know the names of the years off the top of my head. The various puranas in which descriptions of the calendar appear are dated between 500 BC and 500 AD, so it’s hard to say exactly how the numbering system worked in 326 BC.

There’s also a sort of priestly calendar which runs about 4.5 billion years (the natural lifespan of a god), and an even longer one based on the reckoning of the creator god, Brahma, which runs for trillions of years.

More like that it was an Anglo-French plot. :wink:

Or for a more modern controversy -Immanuel Velikovskyargued that the accepted chronology for the Ancient Near East was out by some 400 years, and proposed a new chronology that elides the Greek Dark Ages from around 1200-800 BC and brings the Egyptian chronology more into line with Biblical chronology. Essentially he said that all other historians of the period had made a mistake and double counted several Egyptian dynasties. Mainstreams historians dismmissed his claims as crackpottery.

Thanks all for your input; it’s very much appreciated.

Thank you Thudlow Boink for answering “my” guestion I didn’t think to ask.

Thanks Wendell Wagner and lisiate for the informative links.

I learned something today.

So…referencing 1600 B.C. to the Middle Kingdom would be pinpointing time and place by stating rulers, is that right? (I’m not pulling this out of thin air, it’s in a book I’m currently reading—The Alexander Cipher by Will Adams. It’s what prompted my question in the first place.)

So, what’s the current Japanese calendar era? What event started it, and how far along are we in it?
And another very useful technique for synching up different calendars is astronomical observations. The ancient Babylonians kept records of their observations of Venus and the other planets, and from those observations and our modern knowledge of astronomy, we’re able to convert their calendar down to the day. The same can be done for any other civilization that recorded the planets, and records of less-predictable events like supernovae can serve to match up calendars to each other.

As you note, we don’t know exactly when Jesus was born, but Matthew 2:1 says he was born “during the time of King Herod”. And we know from historical records that Herod died in 4 BC.

The problem is that Luke 2:1 says that Quirinius conducted a census while Mary was pregnant with Jesus. And we have historical records of Quirinius’ term as Governor and the census he conducted - and Quirinius became Governor in 6 AD and conducted the census during his first year in office. So there’s a ten year gap between Herod’s death and Quirinius’ census.

One possible explanation is that Luke screwed up when he mentioned Quirinius. There had been another census conducted by a previous governor, Saturninus, in 8 BC. So if Mary was pregnant during that census, she would have given birth during Herod’s reign.

I’d be willing to let Luke and Matthew slide on getting some minor details wrong. They were, after all, writing the story down around sixty years later and didn’t have Wikipedia access. But it’s a blow to the idea of biblical inerrancy.

And to be fair, the historical records are not unequivocal. It’s possible that Luke and Matthew got their facts right and other writers of the period screwed up their dates. Or historians may have misinterpreted the historical references. So Herod might have been King later than we think or Quirinius might have become governor earlier than we think.

Wait a minute. So you guys are saying that my genuine Roman gold coin that is stamped “200 B.C.” is not genuine?

Shit, then that guy on Ebay cheated me out of five bucks.

I was suspicious when he told me gold used to be brown in color and there was a Roman Emperor named Abrahamus Lincolnius.

Reminds me of the story called “The Morning of two Dawns” in ancient China. There was a legend that said one morning dawn broke as usual, but then it faded to dark night again for several minutes. Then there came a “second” dawn and the day proceeded as normal. It was thought to be just a story without any merit.

In modern times someone that was examining the story said that it sounded like a total solar eclipse had happened just below the horizon. Sure enough, scientists were able to retrace all the total solar eclipses that had happened around that time in China and they found one that lined up perfectly with the story. This gave them the exact time of the event and helped them to date other historical occurrences that happened around that time with unprecedented accuracy.

Don’t be silly; that was a Centauri emperor.

Its Heisei 24

The Heisei era started on 8 January 1989, the first day after the death of the reigning Emperor, Hirohito. His son, Akihito, succeeded to the throne.

Both dates are commonly used in Japan, my Gas and Electricity bills say 24/8 (8th month of Heisei 24) on them, while my phone bill says 12/8

Not exhaustive, (although it can be exhausting), but there is a lot of calendar info at:

Here’s an automatic calendar converter in JavaScript. It handles a lot of them, including the Mayan calendar, the Indian Civil calendar (somavara, Bhadra 12, 1934), the French Republican calendar (Année 220 de la République, Mois de Fructidor, Décade II Jour du Septidi), time_t (1346630400), and the Excel Serial Day Number in both PC (41155) and Macintosh (39693) flavors.

Also, in order to avoid confusion for things like birth dates, sometimes a letter is added to the year.

H12 -> Heisei 12 (2000)
S12 -> Showa 12 (1937)
T12 -> Taisho 12 (1923)
M12 -> Meiji 12 (1879)

Those Romans were crazy… Roman calendar was a horrible mess.
At first they had only ten months ( column ). Romans counted the days from three points in a month, Kalendae being the first day, Nonae was the 5th and Idus was the 14th ( in some months the 15th ). And they counted backwards 'cause they were aiming to that future date. So the second day wasn’t one after Kalendae, it was quarta ante Nonas ( fourth before Nonae ). After Idus You could have something like undevicesimus ante kalendas ( 19th before Kalendae ).
Also 'cause they didn’t have zero, from Monday to Tuesday was two days. Lacking zero also caused that at first the leap years were every third year. Before leap years there were leap days and leap months. And of course Pontifex Maximus, who did the calculations, omitted or added leap months depending on what he liked the present consuls. By the 50 B.C. calendar was about 80 days ahead, so it caused trouble for example in religious ceremonies where one needed grapes that weren’t ripe until three months to the future.
And finally to mess everything up they divided a day into 24 hours, day ( dies ) having 12 hours ( hora ) and night ( nox ) other 12. But since day started at sunrise and night started at sunset, the length of hours changed every day throughout the year!
No wonder that common folk didn’t care much what time it was…

No such luck, You can’t beat them. I have been solemnly told that when Luke mentions Quirinus, it’s his second term ( the first being somewhere in Herod’s time, but the Roman records of that have been lost… )

Up until the late 19th century, the same thing was true in Japan. This didn’t keep some talented inventors from making mechanical clocks that could keep time accurately even with varying hour lengths.

That said, until fairly recently, I doubt many people in the west needed much more precision than “sunrise”, “sundown” and “noon”.

The way I hear it told, people didn’t really move from the “first light, sunrise, midmorning, noon*, afternoon, sundown” model until the Industrial Revolution and specifically until trains. Previously, only scientists cared about smaller divisions; with trains, being five minutes late suddenly became a huge deal.

I’ve heard people of my grandparents’ generation (born 1900-1920), some of which didn’t even know the origin of the words, refer to certain parts of the day as “tertia” or “nona”, the Roman names which survive in Christian liturgy.

  • often indicated by the bells of a local church

More links! Thank you.