No. “Sharing” is WHY we got married(back then)!
We couldnt share without being married. Unmarried people just did not live together back then, most hotels did not allow unmarrieds to have the same room, real estate agents did not sell/rent homes to unmarried couples, companies did not allow their employees to live together, churches did not allow unmarried couples to become members, etc. (I think it was even illegal in some places to have unmarried people living together?)
Therefore, if we wanted to “share” our lives together, we had to get married.
It was either get the wedding ring and be married, or else live alone.
The problem Stainz, and other women who shack up, has, is that her boyfriend already has all the advantages of being married, without any of the responsiblities of being married.
A woman that is living with her boyfriend, has to find some way to convince her boyfriend that although he is getting sex from her, sharing a home with her, eating her meals, taking vacations with her, etc, that somehow, who knows why, he would be better off being married.
I dont know how(but that is up to her) she can prove to him that he would be better off being married if he already has all of the benefits, but that is what she(or any other woman living with a man) needs to do.
Its pretty simple really.
Sit yourselves down, talk to your boyfriend, explain clearly and completely all the extra advantages he will gain by switching from living-together to being officially married, and its a piece of cake from there.
Once you convince your boyfriend that he is missing out on so much because he is just living together with you, and once he realizes all that he is missing out on, he will wear out horses getting to the marriage license bureau as fast as he possibly can.
I really dont personally care if other people are married or not, that is their business, but you have to place yourself in the mans perspective, and prove why he is worse off if he doesnt officially marry you.