Yes, I enjoyed it. I forgot to add it to my list. A chilling ending.
Well done. IIRC, the first line in Death of a Fool is “Nine men’s morris is filled up with mud.”
Let me know if I got that right; it’s been about twenty years.
She researched her cultural stuff really well, and I found her to be quite educational about many minor bits of arcana.
P.S. All you Christie fans: I’ll try to stop hijacking your Christie thread with Marsh conversations, now.
I think this is a weakness of her short-stories and not so much a Miss Marple issue. I think the Poirot short-stories have the same problem. It is hard to set up a scene, develop the mystery, and solve it in 20 pages without making the solution either obvious or arbitrary. If you are still up for it, try one of her novels.
Too true, there are a lot of great ones in the 40’s and 50’s even despite Mrs. Oliver.
Thanks for all your suggestions, guys. Based on your advice, I ordered up:
Murder of Roger Ackroyd
Murder at The Vicarage
Murder On The Orient Express
Wow, lurid-sounding reading or what?
Read Orient Express first. I think it’s the best novel she ever wrote.
And I didn’t like Crooked House at all. It’s re-using an old trick (y’all know which trick I mean!)
Rutherford’s an unadulterated ham (in the best possible sense of the word), but I don’t think the films themselves are that good (and neither is Mirror Crack’d with Angela Lansbury doing a Marple turn).
Certainly, the Poirot films are generally better (as long as you skip the horrible ABC Murders with Tony Curtis). Albert Finney was nominated for an Oscar as Poirot in Orient Express and Ustinov (with 2 Oscars already under his belt) is irresistable as Poirot (though the films get worse and worse as you go along). Still, the production values are pretty high and they’re littered with tons of big-name stars (kind of like a Murder Mystery Love Boat), so they are fun.
It may be an old trick but *Crooked House * was the first time I came across it, so it was new to me.
And on a slight hijack related to Christie’s works - one of the things that does annoy me constantly is her complete inability to do basic arithmetic. There are always glaring inconsistencies between people’s ages and dates. And it’s not just in her later works when she had clearly started to falter.
I picked up Curtain, today. Poirot’s last case.
Never read Christie before, so it’s interesting… very British… and perhaps the wrong Christie book to start with. But, I’m 2 chapters in and the Plot is explicated. So far so good, I’ll let you know.
I don’t know the name of the book or even the name of the movie, but there was an Agatha Christie major motion picture from the late eighties that played second run on HBO. My memories are hazy, but it was set in the mediterranean and it was a fabulously understated suspense-thriller. One of my favorite films, really. Even though it’s slipped my mind. Does anyone know what I am talking about?
Set in the Mediterranean? Possibly Evil Under the Sun?
Yes, tat’s it.
The first Christie I read was ‘The Murder of Roger Ackroyd’.
Although the characters and dialogue were weak, I thought it was a fine mystery.
So I bought every book of hers I could find (I was only a teenager 
).
Sadly none of the others were as good. 
By the time I realised this, I’d bought over 40 :eek: , so I carried on and finished with over 70 books.
They did give a brief glimpse into historical English society, with servants and class attitudes etc, but I never reread any, and eventually gave the collection to charity.
Try Rex Stout or Sherlock Holmes instead!
Oh, yes…I double reinforce the Nero Wolfe recommendation! But make sure they’re Rex Stout Wolfe books…the newer Goldsborough ones are schlock.
Since the Agatha Christie question seems to have been answered, I’ll continue digressing.
For modern english mysteries, no one can beat P. D. James, though if her books seem too long, one can always try Ruth Rendell.
I’ve read two Ngaio March mysteries - one with a lady that gets shot when playing the organ in church, and another one (Death of a Peer) where all the Lampreys are having a family affair and someone is killed. In both cases the murderer turned out to be someone unsympathetic or at least someone that we wouldn’t like or care about. Does this hold true in all of Ngaio March’s mysteries? One nice thing about Agatha Christie’s mysteries is that the murderer can turn out to be someone that you’ve been rooting for in the story.
Pardon, another digression. What is the name of that club Nero belongs to? (I think it’s Nero I mean.) They meet over a gourmet meal, no women are allowed, and they solve puzzles after the meal? It’s all very cloak and daggers, there is a special area set aside for them to dine and think in. Does anyone know what I am talking about? I’ve been wanting to find the short stories involving this club, but I can’t recall the name of the club, or even if I have the sleuth’s name correct.
devilsknew, after you are done with “Curtain”, you’ll want to pick up “The Mysterious Affair at Styles” to see how it all began. 
I think you’re thinking of Asimov’s The Black Widowers stories on this one. The waiter/butler is the one that usually figures out the mystery?
Not always. In one story (the name of which escapes me at the moment), Inspector Alleyn says to himeslf, “There go the nicest pair of murderers I’ve ever met.”
He was on vacation in Italy, IIRC, and not responsible for closing the case.
Yes! That’s it, thank you! I’ve been wanting to re-read those stories for some time. Now, to find the particular collection(s) I recall.
ETA: I am thinking that the reason I thought it must be Nero is that I discovered them the same summer I started in on Nero.
When in Rome.