# I'm gonna have to pit all you butt-hurt snowflakes

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 15, 2017, 3:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203 "2017-01-15T03:22:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 44

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/861 "2017-02-01T12:53:26Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Miskatonic](#):
>
> I’m gonna sprain my eyeballs if you make them roll any harder.
> 
> Yes, DA, we know. We get it. You’ve said this several times. It wasn’t original the first time you said it. We’re tired of it. It isn’t worthy of our consideration. You resorted to calling people snowflakes and have been trying to fart up this smokescreen ever since. You are facing a liberal audidence but you are not dealing with unerring liberal orthodoxy. You are creating a field of strawman you think you’ll slay and be the hero. You are failing even at that.
> 
> So please take you ‘suggestions’ and have a nice walk.

Well, you see the thing is I think I am in fact facing quite a bit of liberal orthodoxy.

If the notion that some of the liberals here are butthurt snowflakes bothers you, you might want to ask yourself why that accusation strikes a nerve with you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/862 "2017-02-01T12:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> Well, sexual assault (and bragging about it), defrauding students at his “University”, housing discrimination, suggesting a judge in a case against him could not be fair because of his ethnicity, not divesting or revealing his financial conflicts. I’m sure we could come up with a few more if you’re really interested.
> 
> And it’s my understanding that the protests have been remarkably non-violent, considering their size.

The ProtestJ20 protest was violent and intended to be so.

And wtf does size have to do with it?

The million man march had between 400K and 1.2 million participants without any rioting that I can recall.

The March for life routinely attracts over half a million protesters without any violence.

The Women’s march had nearly a million protesters just in DC and there was no violence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/863 "2017-02-01T13:15:30Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> It does appear as though you do not wish for anyone to predict the future.
> 
> It does appear as though you do not wish for anyone to object to what he has said he will do.
> 
> In fact, it was not until he made the ban that you “allowed” anyone to critize him in any way.
> 
> Now, to be fair, your lack of permission has had an impact on exaclty not a single person, so it is true that you were not saying that “you _ **can’t** _ criticize Trump in any way?”, just that it is stupid, silly, or whatever other disparaging term you have for the snowflakes that were protesting against the things that trump said he would do.
> 
> If I tell you that I am going to steal your car, is it silly for you to object to that before I actually steal your car?
> 
> Well, no, you are not saying that we can’t criticize trump, but only because you don’t have the power to stop anyone.

The accusation was that I was telling people that they cannot criticize Trump IN ANY WAY. Now that was not exactly accurate, then perhaps you would like to amend the accusation to “you criticized the violent protest of Trump and disparaged people who marched against Trump before he actually did anything”

> [@](#):
>
> You are stating that you will dismiss and disparage such criticisms.

some yes, some no.

> [@](#):
>
> Sure, some of the things have been hyperbolic, or even made in jest, but, most of it was perfectly reasonable criticism, and concern for what he planned to do in the future, and all of that was lumped into your snowflake diatribes.

Some yes, some no. If you criticize Trump for doing something that any other Republican would do, I would say, elections have consequences.

If you run around calling for electors to defect en masse, I will say that subverting democracy for the sake of your partisan desires is worse or the country than Trump.

If you say that Trump is going to be a thrall of Putin because he owes Russians some money or because the Russian mob will threaten his family, I will point and laugh at you.

If you believe that Trump is not a legitimate president because RUSSIAN hacking revealed Hillary’ duplicity, corruption and cheating, I will criticize you for your partisanship.

If you bring up the popular vote as the TRUE gauge of the will of the people in a nation where 45% of the voting population (or 100 million people) doesn’t even bother voting, I will point out how silly you are.

What particular positions have I criticized or ridiculed that you feel could not reasonably be criticized or ridiculed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 1:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/864 "2017-02-01T13:36:47Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> Well, you see the thing is I think I am in fact facing quite a bit of liberal orthodoxy.
> 
> If the notion that some of the liberals here are butthurt snowflakes bothers you, you might want to ask yourself why that accusation strikes a nerve with you.

Why do you make so many posts? One after the other. Repeating the same tired crap, over & over. The problem is that you are just so deadly boring.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eulalia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eulalia/32/457_2.png) [@eulalia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eulalia)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/865 "2017-02-01T13:46:08Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> The ProtestJ20 protest was violent and intended to be so.
> 
> And wtf does size have to do with it?
> 
> The million man march had between 400K and 1.2 million participants without any rioting that I can recall.
> 
> The March for life routinely attracts over half a million protesters without any violence.
> 
> The Women’s march had nearly a million protesters just in DC and there was no violence.

The only people that were violent were the anarchists, who were a small number within a large crowd, and in no way represented most of the people protesting that day. The anarchist’s plan seems to be to try to get the police to overreact and abuse people who weren’t involved in the violence in the hope that they can recruit people to join them against the police and the government. It’s the same tactic Daesh uses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/866 "2017-02-01T14:44:37Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> The ProtestJ20 protest was violent and intended to be so.

Well, I hadn’t heard of ProtestJ20, and don’t find very much about it in the news, so they couldn’t have made much of a splash.

And you ignored the meat of my post. You asked what Trump had done of the eve of his inauguration that was worth protesting, and I gave you a partial list. No comment on that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/867 "2017-02-01T14:59:48Z")

</div>

> [@Bridget\_Burke](#):
>
> Why do you make so many posts? One after the other. Repeating the same tired crap, over & over. The problem is that you are just so deadly boring.

In almost every post, I am responding to another post. So if I seem repetitious it is only because others are making the same point over and over again. Should I respond to the point once and then let the other side of the argument keep repeating their side of the argument?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/868 "2017-02-01T15:03:01Z")

</div>

> [@eulalia](#):
>
> The only people that were violent were the anarchists, who were a small number within a large crowd, and in no way represented most of the people protesting that day. The anarchist’s plan seems to be to try to get the police to overreact and abuse people who weren’t involved in the violence in the hope that they can recruit people to join them against the police and the government. It’s the same tactic Daesh uses.

If you postulate that all the violent protesters were anarchists then you can reach the conclusion that anarchists were the only violent protesters but the ProtestJ20 violence sprang from several quarters. You can call them all anarchists but then you could call also ProtestJ20 an anarchist protest.

Once again, I am differentiating these guys from the women’s march the next day, which was peaceful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/869 "2017-02-01T15:03:10Z")

</div>

> [@Bridget\_Burke](#):
>
> Why do you make so many posts? One after the other. Repeating the same tired crap, over & over. The problem is that you are just so deadly boring.

Boring, and hard to follow, and far too prolific to try and hack through all that hard-to-make-sense-of, yet extremely uninteresting, crap.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/870 "2017-02-01T15:13:12Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> Well, I hadn’t heard of ProtestJ20, and don’t find very much about it in the news, so they couldn’t have made much of a splash.
> 
> And you ignored the meat of my post. You asked what Trump had done of the eve of his inauguration that was worth protesting, and I gave you a partial list. No comment on that?

I’m sorry despite all the criticism about me posting too much and responding to every post, it is obvious that I also don’t post enough when I don’t address every post.

I should have said DisruptJ20

> **[DisruptJ20](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disrupt_J20)**
>
> DisruptJ20 (also Disrupt J20) was an organization that protested and attempted to disrupt events of the presidential inauguration of the 45th U.S. President, Donald Trump, which occurred on January 20, 2017. The group was founded in July 2016 and publicly launched on November 11 after Trump won the 2016 United States presidential election. DisruptJ20's inauguration protests were a part of a wider array of protests organized both locally and nationally from a more extensive initial plan. The pro...

They were the guys that were protesting on inauguration day.

> [@](#):
>
> Well, sexual assault (and bragging about it), defrauding students at his “University”, housing discrimination, suggesting a judge in a case against him could not be fair because of his ethnicity, not divesting or revealing his financial conflicts. I’m sure we could come up with a few more if you’re really interested.

First, none of the stuff you listed justifies violent protests.

Isn’t it a bit silly to protest the inauguration of any president unless the election was rigged or something? The will of the people (including the people who protested) was expressed through an election just a few short months before the protest. What happened between the election and the inauguration that would make anyone think that the protest was anything more than frustration over losing an election?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/871 "2017-02-01T15:15:01Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Boring, and hard to follow, and far too prolific to try and hack through all that hard-to-make-sense-of, yet extremely uninteresting, crap.

Sometimes thinking is hard. But keep trying, your brain is like a muscle, it atrophies when you don’t use it and it just gets harder the next time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_L.A](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_l.a/32/1084_2.png) [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/872 "2017-02-01T15:19:10Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> Sometimes thinking is hard.

Which is why we have an unqualified, vindictive, pwecious widdle snowflake as peeresident.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robot\_Arm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/robot_arm/32/18280_2.png) [@Robot\_Arm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robot_Arm)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/873 "2017-02-01T15:21:50Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> First, none of the stuff you listed justifies violent protests.

I never said any of it justified violent protests. And even that new link you posted doesn’t say anything about actual violence being committed. It says they linked arms at security checkpoints.

> [@](#):
>
> Isn’t it a bit silly to protest the inauguration of any president unless the election was rigged or something?

No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/874 "2017-02-01T15:25:14Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> In almost every post, I am responding to another post. So if I seem repetitious it is only because others are making the same point over and over again. Should I respond to the point once and then let the other side of the argument keep repeating their side of the argument?

Since at this point few people are bothering to read your posts it wouldn’t make much difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eulalia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eulalia/32/457_2.png) [@eulalia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eulalia)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/875 "2017-02-01T15:33:09Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> If you postulate that all the violent protesters were anarchists then you can reach the conclusion that anarchists were the only violent protesters but the ProtestJ20 violence sprang from several quarters. You can call them all anarchists but then you could call also ProtestJ20 an anarchist protest.
> 
> Once again, I am differentiating these guys from the women’s march the next day, which was peaceful.

I saw no instances recorded that were not the guys in black who were spray painting anarchist symbols. Do you have images of others who are not in this group?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/876 "2017-02-01T15:34:34Z")

</div>

> [@Damuri\_Ajashi](#):
>
> Isn’t it a bit silly to protest the inauguration of any president unless the election was rigged or something?

I suppose I should be unsurprised that you managed to become even more wrong.

Up next I expect whining that people shouldn’t protest because they might annoy commuters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/877 "2017-02-01T15:47:05Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> I never said any of it justified violent protests. And even that new link you posted doesn’t say anything about actual violence being committed. It says they linked arms at security checkpoints.

Read post 858 where you are responding to my objection to violent protests.

Do you really need me to link footage of the violence on inauguration day?

> [@](#):
>
> No.

I think I’ve made an argument for why it is silly to protest the inauguration of a duly elected president. What can you possibly achieve by showing that the people that voted for the losing candidate would STILL vote for the losing candidate?

Your argument for protesting a winning candidate seems to be that you don’t like him and the stuff he’s said. That’s fine but imagine how silly you would find a bunch of frustrated Trump supporters protesting (sometimes violently) the inauguration of Hillary. And it wouldn’t just be the Hillary supporters that would find it silly. Everyone who was not a die hard Trump supporter would find the notion a bit silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/878 "2017-02-01T15:49:33Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Since at this point few people are bothering to read your posts it wouldn’t make much difference.

Just fighting ignorance (its taking longer than we thought).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/879 "2017-02-01T15:50:59Z")

</div>

> [@eulalia](#):
>
> I saw no instances recorded that were not the guys in black who were spray painting anarchist symbols. Do you have images of others who are not in this group?

That’s true. But if all the guys in black were anarchists then there was a large anarchist component to the protests on inauguration day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2017, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203/880 "2017-02-01T15:54:10Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Miskatonic](#):
>
> I suppose I should be unsurprised that you managed to become even more wrong.
> 
> Up next I expect whining that people shouldn’t protest because they might annoy commuters.

In typical fashion, no argument just insults. No analysis, just a reliance on the generally hospitable liberal environment of this board.

As for annoying commuters, it depends. Are you protesting something like segregation or just expressing your frustration that your candidate lost?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203.md?page=43)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-gonna-have-to-pit-all-you-butt-hurt-snowflakes/777203.md?page=45)
