The violence was overwhelmingly on one side in Charlottesville. Maybe there was at least one liberal who initiated violence. Or maybe not. But there were definitely tons of white supremacists (who generally identify on the right and support Trump) who planned for violence, initiated violence, injured and killed people, and expressed satisfaction for committing violence afterwards.
It was the Nazis. They invaded Poland.
So nothing on Heather Heyer being an extremist?
That’s besides the point. There are many rallies where the predominant form of violence is antifa. The point is if you express the legitimacy of using violence to suppress fundamental freedoms AND engage in violence to suppress fundamental freedoms don’t be surprised, shocked, or outraged when violence happens.
Redundantly expressing biased information in order to create martyrs is nothing but a distraction.
Yeah, and those Nazis got dealt with. Germany got lumped up for that invasion. In large part by the Soviets who weren’t angels themselves. I guess that actually may support the totalitarian point of view though. Without extreme tyranny would the USSR have been able to industrialize in time?
When mobs of people clash it’s impossible to disentangle the justified carnage from the unjustified. Which is my point that you fools in this thread deliberately distort. When violence is a justified tactic for suppression of rights, those willing to use violence are the ones with rights. I honestly can’t believe this is a difficult subject.
[Post shortened]
Had to stop there because indeed, all the rest of your post is a nothingburger because neither him or others are not saying that violence is justified. Again: it is when violence enters the picture when freedom of expression is not a defense.
It is honestly too hard to get for a mollusk, I know.
You must not pay attention to these boards.
And one more irrelevant thing from you too. If you had better cognition you should know that me and others already did say that those do not get any support when violence enters the picture. And even then I already did say that I agree with taking BLM out if they interrupt a meet.
Very few, at most, people in this thread are in favor of violence. I’m against violence and I believe that violence is no more a problem on the left than on the right, and I think the statistics support this. And I think pretty much of all of the violence that’s occurred is not in response to any other violence.