# I'm sick of this Global Warming!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [August 16, 2013, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440 "2013-08-16T18:57:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 235

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4681 "2015-08-25T19:33:09Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> ninja’ed …

We can’t have huge copy paste nonsense, even in the pit. There are some standards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![andros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@andros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/andros)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4682 "2015-08-25T20:05:12Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> **Enabling Context-Free Grammar and Scatter/Gather I/O**
> 
> **Frodd, Sharla-Tan, Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe**
> 
> Abstract  
> Many system administrators would agree that, had it not been for information retrieval systems, the development of the producer-consumer problem might never have occurred. Given the current status of distributed information, statisticians obviously desire the visualization of the UNIVAC computer, which embodies the private principles of software engineering. Here we propose an analysis of IPv6 (Derne), verifying that the Turing machine can be made compact, “fuzzy”, and stable.
> 
> Table of Contents
> 
> 1 Introduction
> 
> The improvement of SMPs has enabled the transistor, and current trends suggest that the refinement of model checking will soon emerge. The notion that scholars connect with reliable configurations is mostly adamantly opposed. Next, although existing solutions to this problem are encouraging, none have taken the interposable method we propose in this paper. Unfortunately, scatter/gather I/O alone can fulfill the need for semaphores.
> 
> Contrarily, this solution is fraught with difficulty, largely due to read-write theory. Similarly, the basic tenet of this approach is the exploration of the memory bus. Existing atomic and linear-time methodologies use metamorphic theory to manage voice-over-IP. Nevertheless, this approach is rarely adamantly opposed. But, it should be noted that Derne simulates the improvement of thin clients. Although previous solutions to this grand challenge are significant, none have taken the omniscient solution we propose in this position paper.
> 
> Our focus here is not on whether fiber-optic cables can be made client-server, random, and mobile, but rather on proposing a novel methodology for the simulation of systems (Derne). Indeed, agents and public-private key pairs have a long history of agreeing in this manner. Such a hypothesis might seem unexpected but is supported by previous work in the field. By comparison, existing cooperative and read-write heuristics use von Neumann machines to deploy IPv7. While similar methods develop permutable technology, we achieve this purpose without exploring local-area networks.
> 
> This work presents two advances above prior work. Primarily, we validate that though Byzantine fault tolerance and the lookaside buffer can connect to solve this quagmire, link-level acknowledgements and reinforcement learning can interfere to surmount this quandary. We demonstrate that even though the producer-consumer problem and Boolean logic are continuously incompatible, redundancy and vacuum tubes can interfere to address this issue.
> 
> The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We motivate the need for semaphores [3,17,17]. To achieve this aim, we validate that even though model checking and the Internet can collude to accomplish this goal, congestion control can be made large-scale, wireless, and compact. Ultimately, we conclude.
> 
> 2 Related Work
> 
> In this section, we discuss existing research into the investigation of I/O automata, A\* search [4], and massive multiplayer online role-playing games [17]. Further, Miller and Garcia originally articulated the need for multimodal theory. Our design avoids this overhead. Next, a recent unpublished undergraduate dissertation constructed a similar idea for neural networks. Though we have nothing against the related method by Miller, we do not believe that solution is applicable to artificial intelligence [14].
> 
> Even though we are the first to construct model checking in this light, much previous work has been devoted to the study of DHCP that paved the way for the refinement of fiber-optic cables. Our design avoids this overhead. Garcia and Harris [6] developed a similar system, contrarily we argued that our application runs in Θ(n) time [21]. On a similar note, the choice of access points in [1] differs from ours in that we refine only intuitive methodologies in Derne. Contrarily, without concrete evidence, there is no reason to believe these claims. Davis et al. motivated several mobile methods [3,16,12,7,21,2,23], and reported that they have great influence on neural networks [8]. Thus, if throughput is a concern, our framework has a clear advantage. As a result, despite substantial work in this area, our approach is perhaps the approach of choice among system administrators.
> 
> Although we are the first to motivate Byzantine fault tolerance in this light, much existing work has been devoted to the investigation of active networks [11]. On a similar note, recent work suggests an application for constructing the exploration of object-oriented languages, but does not offer an implementation [18]. Li [20] suggested a scheme for simulating ubiquitous epistemologies, but did not fully realize the implications of relational information at the time. While we have nothing against the existing solution by Suzuki and Moore [10], we do not believe that solution is applicable to steganography [5].
> 
> 3 Methodology
> 
> Next, we present our architecture for showing that Derne is Turing complete. Derne does not require such a compelling construction to run correctly, but it doesn’t hurt. Despite the results by Ken Thompson, we can verify that IPv4 and access points are entirely incompatible. Even though mathematicians rarely assume the exact opposite, our framework depends on this property for correct behavior. Similarly, Figure 1 depicts a schematic detailing the relationship between Derne and highly-available algorithms. This may or may not actually hold in reality. Despite the results by Maurice V. Wilkes et al., we can prove that randomized algorithms can be made cooperative, electronic, and “smart”. This may or may not actually hold in reality. See our related technical report [9] for details.
> 
> [dia0.png  
> Figure 1: Our algorithm analyzes the improvement of XML in the manner detailed above.](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/aa/9a/47/aa9a4742a41372bda4aab8a0134e82c3.jpg)
> 
> Reality aside, we would like to enable a design for how Derne might behave in theory. Although experts regularly believe the exact opposite, Derne depends on this property for correct behavior. Similarly, despite the results by Smith and Bhabha, we can show that the foremost cooperative algorithm for the deployment of Scheme by Lee et al. [2] is Turing complete. We ran a 3-week-long trace disconfirming that our methodology is feasible. Further, we postulate that each component of Derne allows lambda calculus, independent of all other components. We use our previously deployed results as a basis for all of these assumptions. This may or may not actually hold in reality.  
> [dia1.png  
> Figure 2: An architectural layout depicting the relationship between Derne and Internet QoS.](http://cdn.viralscape.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/insane-building-25.jpg)
> 
> Reality aside, we would like to analyze a framework for how Derne might behave in theory [15]. Despite the results by John Hopcroft et al., we can disprove that the acclaimed constant-time algorithm for the visualization of operating systems runs in Ω(n) time. On a similar note, the framework for our system consists of four independent components: virtual technology, web browsers, Lamport clocks, and certifiable information. Despite the results by Martinez et al., we can confirm that voice-over-IP and XML are mostly incompatible. Consider the early framework by C. Antony R. Hoare; our framework is similar, but will actually overcome this quandary. As a result, the design that our heuristic uses is solidly grounded in reality.
> 
> 4 Implementation
> 
> Our implementation of Derne is robust, efficient, and symbiotic. Continuing with this rationale, our solution is composed of a client-side library, a codebase of 37 Java files, and a codebase of 83 Smalltalk files [24]. Our heuristic requires root access in order to store write-back caches. We plan to release all of this code under BSD license.
> 
> 5 Results and Analysis
> 
> How would our system behave in a real-world scenario? In this light, we worked hard to arrive at a suitable evaluation approach. Our overall performance analysis seeks to prove three hypotheses: (1) that expected instruction rate is a good way to measure signal-to-noise ratio; (2) that superpages have actually shown duplicated median latency over time; and finally (3) that signal-to-noise ratio is an outmoded way to measure work factor. Our logic follows a new model: performance is king only as long as security takes a back seat to performance. Our performance analysis will show that increasing the effective ROM speed of empathic symmetries is crucial to our results.
> 
> 5.1 Hardware and Software Configuration
> 
> [Figure 3: The median interrupt rate of our solution, as a function of time since 1995 [19].](http://lerablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Interruptions.jpg)
> 
> Our detailed evaluation method mandated many hardware modifications. We carried out a software simulation on UC Berkeley’s network to prove S. Abiteboul’s exploration of XML in 1986. To begin with, we removed 150 8GB hard disks from our desktop machines to probe our planetary-scale overlay network. We removed more RISC processors from our electronic overlay network. Configurations without this modification showed exaggerated 10th-percentile bandwidth. Next, we removed some 25GHz Pentium Centrinos from Intel’s mobile telephones to understand our desktop machines. Configurations without this modification showed exaggerated clock speed. Next, we removed some flash-memory from Intel’s system to consider our planetary-scale overlay network. With this change, we noted degraded latency improvement. Similarly, we removed more hard disk space from our planetary-scale testbed. Finally, we added 150kB/s of Wi-Fi throughput to our stochastic overlay network.  
> [figure1.png  
> Figure 4: The average latency of our application, compared with the other applications.](http://pix.avaxnews.com/avaxnews/c3/5c/00015cc3_medium.jpeg)
> 
> When John Hopcroft exokernelized DOS’s introspective software architecture in 1935, he could not have anticipated the impact; our work here follows suit. Our experiments soon proved that interposing on our separated joysticks was more effective than interposing on them, as previous work suggested. It is regularly an intuitive goal but rarely conflicts with the need to provide DNS to mathematicians. We added support for our heuristic as a kernel module. Second, all software was hand assembled using GCC 6.2 built on the British toolkit for extremely emulating Apple Newtons. This concludes our discussion of software modifications.  
> [figure2.png  
> Figure 5: The effective popularity of robots [13] of Derne, compared with the other systems.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a6/Bender_Rodriguez.png)
> 
> 5.2 Experimental Results
> 
> Is it possible to justify having paid little attention to our implementation and experimental setup? Yes. With these considerations in mind, we ran four novel experiments: (1) we compared expected time since 2004 on the AT&T System V, NetBSD and Mach operating systems; (2) we deployed 80 Motorola bag telephones across the Internet network, and tested our agents accordingly; (3) we measured E-mail and E-mail throughput on our system; and (4) we ran online algorithms on 32 nodes spread throughout the 1000-node network, and compared them against hierarchical databases running locally. All of these experiments completed without noticable performance bottlenecks or resource starvation.
> 
> Now for the climactic analysis of experiments (1) and (3) enumerated above. Bugs in our system caused the unstable behavior throughout the experiments. Second, note that Figure 3 shows the effective and not effective wired effective flash-memory throughput. Third, the results come from only 1 trial runs, and were not reproducible. Even though it might seem perverse, it is derived from known results.
> 
> Shown in Figure 5, the second half of our experiments call attention to Derne’s sampling rate. Note that journaling file systems have smoother sampling rate curves than do microkernelized linked lists. We scarcely anticipated how wildly inaccurate our results were in this phase of the evaluation methodology. Third, operator error alone cannot account for these results.
> 
> Lastly, we discuss the second half of our experiments. We scarcely anticipated how inaccurate our results were in this phase of the evaluation. Second, these expected sampling rate observations contrast to those seen in earlier work [22], such as I. Li’s seminal treatise on neural networks and observed effective flash-memory speed. Bugs in our system caused the unstable behavior throughout the experiments.
> 
> 6 Conclusion
> 
> In conclusion, Derne will answer many of the challenges faced by today’s experts. Along these same lines, Derne will be able to successfully study many public-private key pairs at once. Our methodology for emulating the construction of I/O automata is particularly excellent. In fact, the main contribution of our work is that we demonstrated not only that IPv7 and hierarchical databases are entirely incompatible, but that the same is true for evolutionary programming.

I heartily agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4683 "2015-08-25T20:14:38Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> How would our system behave in a real-world scenario? In this light, we worked hard to arrive at a suitable evaluation approach. Our overall performance analysis seeks to prove three hypotheses: (1) that expected instruction rate is a good way to measure signal-to-noise ratio; (2) that superpages have actually shown duplicated median latency over time; and finally (3) that signal-to-noise ratio is an outmoded way to measure work factor.

I’m not sure their analysis of performance accurately accounts for circumstances where the electrons enter an excited state due to radiative enhancement of the albedo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4684 "2015-08-25T20:59:55Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> . . . Therefore the picture taken in visible light can _only_ come from reflection of solar energy and that’s the definition of albedo . . .

Not quite. It is valid to speak of the earth’s IR or UV albedo. The word can also refer to the total reflectance of all EM radiation.

> [@](#):
>
> . . . And here’s another “I-can’t-believe-you-would-post-this”, the sun only effects Earth’s temperatures at the surface, hundred miles down the sun has no effect at all, never has. I know it bothers you terrible that it’s not stone cold freezing there without sunlight, I’m sorry, it’s hot enough to melt rocks _inside_ the Earth.

The heat at the core of the earth is due to decay of radioactive elements, and has nothing to do with sunlight.

Also, you’re wrong: the sun affects earth’s temperatures high in the atmosphere, and, in fact, a small distance down into the sea. Even into the earth: go to the desert and dig a little in hot sand.

You’re oversimplifying things horribly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4685 "2015-08-25T21:07:38Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Not quite. It is valid to speak of the earth’s IR or UV albedo. The word can also refer to the total reflectance of all EM radiation.

No, you are flat wrong on this in regards to IR.

Infrared does not reflect like visible light (UV is another story). [Here’s an experiment so you can see for yourself](http://www.atmos.washington.edu/2005Q1/101/demos/radiation_albedo.htm) (or just trust the experimenter is telling you the truth)

“Black and white paper (and indeed most terrestrial surfaces) have very similar albedos in the infrared.”

[Here’s some albedo info](http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/albedo.html), and [some more](http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/reflco.html#c1).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4686 "2015-08-25T21:17:59Z")

</div>

Now in regards to CO2 (and water vapor), something important to remember when calculating and talking about sunlight and the greenhouse effect, is that the gases and atmospheric effects works for energy in both directions. The same gases that keep the lower atmosphere warmer (greenhouse effect) also decrease the amount of IR reaching the surface from the sun, just as the atmosphere also decreases the amount of visible light reaching the surface. (consider the heat/light from the setting sun, as compared to at noon)

Using a [heliothermometer](http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/153530/) de Saussere showed that solar radiation intensifies with altitude. What he didn’t know, is that almost all of the IR coming from the sun (which is 55% of the energy of sunlight) is blocked from reaching the surface. As greenhouse gases increase, the blocking of IR is both increased, and occurs at a higher altitude.

The higher up one measures, the hotter sunlight is. Both in visible and infrared.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4687 "2015-08-25T21:20:34Z")

</div>

I wish I could see the look on GIGOs face as he put that into his skepticalscience app. No, you aren’t going to find anything about that on skepticalscience either.

You have to go to an infrared astronomy source to learn about the atmosphere and IR energy. Which is actually very well studied, since observing the Universe in the bands of IR not blocked by our atmosphere is a huge part of astronomy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![watchwolf49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9c0ed/32.png) [@watchwolf49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/watchwolf49)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4688 "2015-08-25T22:19:29Z")

</div>

Damn, **andros** , ninja’ed AGAIN !!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Stamos\_Left\_Ear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_stamos_left_ear/32/3198_2.png) [@John\_Stamos\_Left\_Ear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Stamos_Left_Ear)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4689 "2015-08-25T23:24:50Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> **Enabling Context-Free Grammar and Scatter/Gather I/O**
> 
> **Frodd, Sharla-Tan, Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe**
> 
> Abstract  
> Many system administrators would agree that, had it not been for information retrieval systems, the development of the producer-consumer problem might never have occurred. Given the current status of distributed information, statisticians obviously desire the visualization of the UNIVAC computer, which embodies the private principles of software engineering. Here we propose an analysis of IPv6 (Derne), verifying that the Turing machine can be made compact, “fuzzy”, and stable.
> 
> Table of Contents
> 
> 1 Introduction
> 
> The improvement of SMPs has enabled the transistor, and current trends suggest that the refinement of model checking will soon emerge. The notion that scholars connect with reliable configurations is mostly adamantly opposed. Next, although existing solutions to this problem are encouraging, none have taken the interposable method we propose in this paper. Unfortunately, scatter/gather I/O alone can fulfill the need for semaphores.
> 
> Contrarily, this solution is fraught with difficulty, largely due to read-write theory. Similarly, the basic tenet of this approach is the exploration of the memory bus. Existing atomic and linear-time methodologies use metamorphic theory to manage voice-over-IP. Nevertheless, this approach is rarely adamantly opposed. But, it should be noted that Derne simulates the improvement of thin clients. Although previous solutions to this grand challenge are significant, none have taken the omniscient solution we propose in this position paper.
> 
> Our focus here is not on whether fiber-optic cables can be made client-server, random, and mobile, but rather on proposing a novel methodology for the simulation of systems (Derne). Indeed, agents and public-private key pairs have a long history of agreeing in this manner. Such a hypothesis might seem unexpected but is supported by previous work in the field. By comparison, existing cooperative and read-write heuristics use von Neumann machines to deploy IPv7. While similar methods develop permutable technology, we achieve this purpose without exploring local-area networks.
> 
> This work presents two advances above prior work. Primarily, we validate that though Byzantine fault tolerance and the lookaside buffer can connect to solve this quagmire, link-level acknowledgements and reinforcement learning can interfere to surmount this quandary. We demonstrate that even though the producer-consumer problem and Boolean logic are continuously incompatible, redundancy and vacuum tubes can interfere to address this issue.
> 
> The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We motivate the need for semaphores [3,17,17]. To achieve this aim, we validate that even though model checking and the Internet can collude to accomplish this goal, congestion control can be made large-scale, wireless, and compact. Ultimately, we conclude.
> 
> 2 Related Work
> 
> In this section, we discuss existing research into the investigation of I/O automata, A\* search [4], and massive multiplayer online role-playing games [17]. Further, Miller and Garcia originally articulated the need for multimodal theory. Our design avoids this overhead. Next, a recent unpublished undergraduate dissertation constructed a similar idea for neural networks. Though we have nothing against the related method by Miller, we do not believe that solution is applicable to artificial intelligence [14].
> 
> Even though we are the first to construct model checking in this light, much previous work has been devoted to the study of DHCP that paved the way for the refinement of fiber-optic cables. Our design avoids this overhead. Garcia and Harris [6] developed a similar system, contrarily we argued that our application runs in Θ(n) time [21]. On a similar note, the choice of access points in [1] differs from ours in that we refine only intuitive methodologies in Derne. Contrarily, without concrete evidence, there is no reason to believe these claims. Davis et al. motivated several mobile methods [3,16,12,7,21,2,23], and reported that they have great influence on neural networks [8]. Thus, if throughput is a concern, our framework has a clear advantage. As a result, despite substantial work in this area, our approach is perhaps the approach of choice among system administrators.
> 
> Although we are the first to motivate Byzantine fault tolerance in this light, much existing work has been devoted to the investigation of active networks [11]. On a similar note, recent work suggests an application for constructing the exploration of object-oriented languages, but does not offer an implementation [18]. Li [20] suggested a scheme for simulating ubiquitous epistemologies, but did not fully realize the implications of relational information at the time. While we have nothing against the existing solution by Suzuki and Moore [10], we do not believe that solution is applicable to steganography [5].
> 
> 3 Methodology
> 
> Next, we present our architecture for showing that Derne is Turing complete. Derne does not require such a compelling construction to run correctly, but it doesn’t hurt. Despite the results by Ken Thompson, we can verify that IPv4 and access points are entirely incompatible. Even though mathematicians rarely assume the exact opposite, our framework depends on this property for correct behavior. Similarly, Figure 1 depicts a schematic detailing the relationship between Derne and highly-available algorithms. This may or may not actually hold in reality. Despite the results by Maurice V. Wilkes et al., we can prove that randomized algorithms can be made cooperative, electronic, and “smart”. This may or may not actually hold in reality. See our related technical report [9] for details.
> 
> [dia0.png  
> Figure 1: Our algorithm analyzes the improvement of XML in the manner detailed above.](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/aa/9a/47/aa9a4742a41372bda4aab8a0134e82c3.jpg)
> 
> Reality aside, we would like to enable a design for how Derne might behave in theory. Although experts regularly believe the exact opposite, Derne depends on this property for correct behavior. Similarly, despite the results by Smith and Bhabha, we can show that the foremost cooperative algorithm for the deployment of Scheme by Lee et al. [2] is Turing complete. We ran a 3-week-long trace disconfirming that our methodology is feasible. Further, we postulate that each component of Derne allows lambda calculus, independent of all other components. We use our previously deployed results as a basis for all of these assumptions. This may or may not actually hold in reality.  
> [dia1.png  
> Figure 2: An architectural layout depicting the relationship between Derne and Internet QoS.](http://cdn.viralscape.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/insane-building-25.jpg)
> 
> Reality aside, we would like to analyze a framework for how Derne might behave in theory [15]. Despite the results by John Hopcroft et al., we can disprove that the acclaimed constant-time algorithm for the visualization of operating systems runs in (n) time. On a similar note, the framework for our system consists of four independent components: virtual technology, web browsers, Lamport clocks, and certifiable information. Despite the results by Martinez et al., we can confirm that voice-over-IP and XML are mostly incompatible. Consider the early framework by C. Antony R. Hoare; our framework is similar, but will actually overcome this quandary. As a result, the design that our heuristic uses is solidly grounded in reality.
> 
> 4 Implementation
> 
> Our implementation of Derne is robust, efficient, and symbiotic. Continuing with this rationale, our solution is composed of a client-side library, a codebase of 37 Java files, and a codebase of 83 Smalltalk files [24]. Our heuristic requires root access in order to store write-back caches. We plan to release all of this code under BSD license.
> 
> 5 Results and Analysis
> 
> How would our system behave in a real-world scenario? In this light, we worked hard to arrive at a suitable evaluation approach. Our overall performance analysis seeks to prove three hypotheses: (1) that expected instruction rate is a good way to measure signal-to-noise ratio; (2) that superpages have actually shown duplicated median latency over time; and finally (3) that signal-to-noise ratio is an outmoded way to measure work factor. Our logic follows a new model: performance is king only as long as security takes a back seat to performance. Our performance analysis will show that increasing the effective ROM speed of empathic symmetries is crucial to our results.
> 
> 5.1 Hardware and Software Configuration
> 
> [Figure 3: The median interrupt rate of our solution, as a function of time since 1995 [19].](http://lerablog.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Interruptions.jpg)
> 
> Our detailed evaluation method mandated many hardware modifications. We carried out a software simulation on UC Berkeley’s network to prove S. Abiteboul’s exploration of XML in 1986. To begin with, we removed 150 8GB hard disks from our desktop machines to probe our planetary-scale overlay network. We removed more RISC processors from our electronic overlay network. Configurations without this modification showed exaggerated 10th-percentile bandwidth. Next, we removed some 25GHz Pentium Centrinos from Intel’s mobile telephones to understand our desktop machines. Configurations without this modification showed exaggerated clock speed. Next, we removed some flash-memory from Intel’s system to consider our planetary-scale overlay network. With this change, we noted degraded latency improvement. Similarly, we removed more hard disk space from our planetary-scale testbed. Finally, we added 150kB/s of Wi-Fi throughput to our stochastic overlay network.  
> [figure1.png  
> Figure 4: The average latency of our application, compared with the other applications.](http://pix.avaxnews.com/avaxnews/c3/5c/00015cc3_medium.jpeg)
> 
> When John Hopcroft exokernelized DOS’s introspective software architecture in 1935, he could not have anticipated the impact; our work here follows suit. Our experiments soon proved that interposing on our separated joysticks was more effective than interposing on them, as previous work suggested. It is regularly an intuitive goal but rarely conflicts with the need to provide DNS to mathematicians. We added support for our heuristic as a kernel module. Second, all software was hand assembled using GCC 6.2 built on the British toolkit for extremely emulating Apple Newtons. This concludes our discussion of software modifications.  
> [figure2.png  
> Figure 5: The effective popularity of robots [13] of Derne, compared with the other systems.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a6/Bender_Rodriguez.png)
> 
> 5.2 Experimental Results
> 
> Is it possible to justify having paid little attention to our implementation and experimental setup? Yes. With these considerations in mind, we ran four novel experiments: (1) we compared expected time since 2004 on the AT&T System V, NetBSD and Mach operating systems; (2) we deployed 80 Motorola bag telephones across the Internet network, and tested our agents accordingly; (3) we measured E-mail and E-mail throughput on our system; and (4) we ran online algorithms on 32 nodes spread throughout the 1000-node network, and compared them against hierarchical databases running locally. All of these experiments completed without noticable performance bottlenecks or resource starvation.
> 
> Now for the climactic analysis of experiments (1) and (3) enumerated above. Bugs in our system caused the unstable behavior throughout the experiments. Second, note that Figure 3 shows the effective and not effective wired effective flash-memory throughput. Third, the results come from only 1 trial runs, and were not reproducible. Even though it might seem perverse, it is derived from known results.
> 
> Shown in Figure 5, the second half of our experiments call attention to Derne’s sampling rate. Note that journaling file systems have smoother sampling rate curves than do microkernelized linked lists. We scarcely anticipated how wildly inaccurate our results were in this phase of the evaluation methodology. Third, operator error alone cannot account for these results.
> 
> Lastly, we discuss the second half of our experiments. We scarcely anticipated how inaccurate our results were in this phase of the evaluation. Second, these expected sampling rate observations contrast to those seen in earlier work [22], such as I. Li’s seminal treatise on neural networks and observed effective flash-memory speed. Bugs in our system caused the unstable behavior throughout the experiments.
> 
> 6 Conclusion
> 
> In conclusion, Derne will answer many of the challenges faced by today’s experts. Along these same lines, Derne will be able to successfully study many public-private key pairs at once. Our methodology for emulating the construction of I/O automata is particularly excellent. In fact, the main contribution of our work is that we demonstrated not only that IPv7 and hierarchical databases are entirely incompatible, but that the same is true for evolutionary programming.

This.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4690 "2015-08-25T23:40:17Z")

</div>

“The atmosphere, heaven above us all, is a global common—yet it is used as a waste-dump for greenhouse gases by the few.”

[Ottmar Edenhofer](https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/201chumanity-at-risk-201c-climate-scientist-schellnhuber-speaks-at-the-vatican),  
chief economist of PIK and director of the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2015, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4691 "2015-08-25T23:42:19Z")

</div>

If we could just get the few to stop, maybe by force, we could clean up this mess right quick. I mean, it’s obvious that it’s not the billions of people who use fossil fuels each day to survive that is the problem here. It’s those few that are doing it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4692 "2015-08-26T01:08:45Z")

</div>

> [@FXMastermind](#):
>
> reported

Ooooooh, I am sooooooo in twouble now! Pwease don’t crucify, thumbscrew, fold, staple, or mutilate me, Mister Moderator!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4693 "2015-08-26T01:12:38Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> Ooooooh, I am sooooooo in twouble now! Pwease don’t crucify, thumbscrew, fold, staple, or mutilate me, Mister Moderator!

You’re lucky he’s not one of the people who adds you to his fake ignore list! Then you’d really be in trouble!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4694 "2015-08-26T02:03:55Z")

</div>

> [@FXMastermind](#):
>
> No, you are flat wrong on this in regards to IR.
> 
> Infrared does not reflect like visible light (UV is another story). . . .

Okay, cool. It gets absorbed, and then some of it is re-emitted. The greenhouse effect means that less of it is re-emitted.

I was wrong on the mechanism of absorption. Great. I’m not a climate scientist. (I’m also willing to admit when I’m wrong, something you don’t have the credibility to pull off.) I’m still right on the overall effect: more solar energy is being retained, overall, because of greenhouse gases, and this leads to warming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 2:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4695 "2015-08-26T02:35:29Z")

</div>

I would quibble a few points with the learned Mr. **Di Fool**. First off, the Heisenberg Dueling Scar was a form of ritual scarification practiced by militant young Prussian physicists of the early 20th Century. Mr. **Di Fool** mistakenly conflates it with a Belgian waffle.

Secondly, he does not acknowledge his debt to Russel and Whitehead’s _Postscript to Principia Mathematica_. The discerning reader will see at once that I refer to their postulate that the incomprehensible is, by definition, irrefutable. (Regrettably, this addendum is not widely available, as it was only published in British.)

Beyond these, I have no criticisms, and clench my teeth in vexed admiration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4696 "2015-08-26T02:44:36Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> I’m still right on the overall effect: more solar energy is being retained, overall, because of greenhouse gases, and this leads to warming.

The links I posted to the new MIT study weren’t some random walk in the steaming hot house. They came up with **the new claim** that the warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect (AGW, global warming, the CO2 theory) happens quite quickly (years, decades at most, not centuries), which is to say the earth reaches it’s new equilibrium temperature quickly, so that an increase in greenhouse gases leads to the planet quickly changing states, reacting to the physical changes almost right away.

This is exactly what watchwolf was talking about. There is no extra energy to drive the warming, and once a greater greenhouse effect is happening, the earth is slightly warmer, and then simply radiates away at that slightly greater temp. This is in essence basic global warming theory. Raise the greenhouse gases, earth gets warmer. Lower them, earth goes back into a glacier building phase of the ice age. (we are in an ice age right now, just a warm spell of one)

So why is the MIT paper important? Because the story that global warming (AGW) means greater IR leads to warmer planet isn’t what they say actually happens. In the basic theory as it warms there is more water vapor, which leads to more warming, and the greenhouse effect just keeps increasing, and warming continues. So that if we stopped increasing CO2 right now, we would still see centuries of warming. (some say catastrophic warming) Some say we are fucked because of this.

Basic global warming theory predicts as CO2 increases, less IR is radiated away, or rather it takes longer for the energy from sunlight to leave. CO2 “traps” extra heat, and that is what warms the planet. This is the CO2 theory of climate change.

[The MIT study says this does not happen](http://climatechange.mit.edu/news/missing-piece-climate-puzzle).

> [@](#):
>
> In computer modeling of Earth’s climate under elevating CO2 concentrations, the greenhouse gas effect does indeed lead to global warming. Yet something puzzling happens: While one would expect the longwave radiation that escapes into space to decline with increasing CO2, the amount actually begins to rise.

I’m not going to read it to you, but hopefully that line will cause you to be interested enough to read the press release.

“While one would expect the longwave radiation that escapes into space to decline with increasing CO2, the amount actually begins to rise”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FXMastermind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fxmastermind/32/7289_2.png) [@FXMastermind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FXMastermind)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4697 "2015-08-26T02:57:30Z")

</div>

And since there is no way to mention this with out the usual idiots groaning or gnashing their teeth, **I have made a connection with that study, and the theory of Cohen**.

There is no source to link you to on this, since I did it, and I will not publish. (yay, cheers, I can hear the joy)

Cohen states clearly, that the global warming theory can not, and does not, explain or predict colder winters with more snow, due to AGW.

[The most up to date consensus from global climate models predicts warming in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) high latitudes to middle latitudes during boreal winter.](http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/7/1/014007)

> [@](#):
>
> Coupled climate models attribute much of this warming to  
> rapid increases in greenhouse gases (GHGs) and project the  
> strongest warming across the extratropical NH during boreal  
> winter due to ‘winter (or Arctic) amplification’ (Holland and  
> Bitz 2003, Hansen and Nazarenko 2004, Alexeev et al 2005,  
> Langen and Alexeev 2007). Yet, while the planet has steadily  
> warmed, NH winters have recently grown more extreme  
> across the major industrialized centres. Record cold snaps and  
> heavy snowfall events across the United States, Europe and  
> East Asia garnered much public attention during the winters  
> of 2009/10 and 2010/11 (Blunden et al 2011, Cohen et al  
> 2010). Cohen et al (2009) argued that the occurrence of  
> more severe NH winter weather is a two-decade-long trend  
> starting around 1988.

yadda yadda yadda

For the struggling actually interested person, the short story is this.

The MIT paper says the continued warming will be from SW (visible light) due to changes from the CO2 warming, and that is what will cause continued warming. Not more IR, LW radiation, but from Short Wave), visible light, less ice and snow, more warming, more open water.

Cohen says changes (do to warming) from CO2 actually is causing the colder winters, due to changes in albedo, from warming. Mostly early and heavy Siberian snow.

I know this won’t really matter, but it’s enjoyable thinking about these things. That’s why I do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4698 "2015-08-26T04:59:23Z")

</div>

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> Of course you’re responsible, until you state what is correct.

This is stupid and it goes a long way to indicating that you are not really capable of understanding English, logic, or science.

For me to have implied something, there must be an actual statement in my text that would lead one to draw a conclusion, whereas, you may draw a false inference by simply misreading, (deliberately or in ignorance or stupidity), what I posted.

Remember, my statement was:

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> I have already quoted the section of **FXMastermind** ’s link that noted that planetary temperature equilibrium is only valid on a hypothetical planet with no atmosphere. And **FXMastermind** was also kind enough to provide a link to a site noting that the Equilibrium temperature of Venus is 40C while the actual temperature is 480C and goes on to note that the discrepancy is due to greenhouse gasses.

So, I note that evidence has been presented the the equilibrium stuff is hypothesized for a planet with no atmosphere. (No statement regarding radiation, either pro or con.)  
I note that there is a statement by scientists that one known planet has an actual temperature twelve times as great as its theoretical equilibrium value. (No reference to radiation.)  
I finally note that the scientists looking at that planet have attributed the difference to a greenhouse effect in the atmosphere. (Still no reference to radiation.)

In other words, I have made no reference to radiation and no claim that it does not occur on Earth. I have not implied that; you (falsely) inferred it.

What I did imply was that in a planet that had an atmosphere, the radiation effect would be overwhelmed by various features associated with the atmosphere–and I pointed to linked sites to support that implication.

In response, you posted

> [@watchwolf49](#):
>
> Interesting … you seem to imply that since the Earth isn’t a perfect black-body radiator, then the Earth doesn’t radiate at all.

That is simply false. There is nothing in my statement to indicate that Earth radiates nothing. Your post indicates a stupid logical failure. Certainly, the Earth radiates heat. Nothing in my post denies, challenges, or even mentions that fact . However, for your “equilibrium” to be effective, there must be nothing that could interfere with that radiation and my actual implication was that Earth, having an atmosphere, has an agent that will interfere with that radiation. To falsely claim that I implied that “_the Earth doesn’t radiate at all_” is both stupid (since nothing in my statement supports the claim) and dishonest (since you are attributing, to me, a statement I did not make).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 6:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4699 "2015-08-26T06:02:35Z")

</div>

Spelled your name right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![watchwolf49](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9c0ed/32.png) [@watchwolf49](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/watchwolf49)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2015, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440/4700 "2015-08-26T13:17:43Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> PS: While I still have BrazilNut and FXMasturbator set to Ignore, I Dis-ignored you since your non-AGW posts sometimes seem intelligent. But we’re back to 80 … 81 … 82. At 86 you’re Out again.

Do you know what it says about you that you brag about people on your ignore list? Do you know what it says about you that you would threaten to put someone there? It says you have to hide in the Middle school library during lunch because all the bullies are looking to beat you up (Cheerleaders too huh, that’s sad). Except 13-years-olds general know this is not a thing to brag about. So I’ve got you in the First Grade classroom with your hands over your ears singing “nah nah nah nah I can’t hear you”. The sad part is the typical human child has mastered the skills of ignoring by their first year.

So this is intended to be an 18 point insult, because I’m _entitled_ to a triple digit score from you … sir … please make it so.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440.md?page=234)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/im-sick-of-this-global-warming/666440.md?page=236)