No, and that is just more nonsense. Anyone who makes pseudo-scientific claims is, by definition, promoting pseudo-scientific nonsense. It doesn’t even take an expert to see that if the claim is straight up and clear, and the data supports the claim, (or rather, the data actually makes the case), then anyone arguing against the data is not being scientific, or even rational about it.
When speaking about trends in hurricanes, and pointing out that Al Gore was full of it, and the predictions about monster storms and bigger hurricanes becoming the "new normal" turned out to be wrong, then pointing at the data for the time period under discussion is quite scientific. It would be in fact, the very thing to look at. If "global warming" was to cause stronger, more intense, more numerous hurricanes, or any other claim, then looking at the temperature data is simply a rational and scientific thing to do.
If the data showed the same rate of warming as was measured in the years leading up to the predictions about monster storms, then it is reasonable to say warming didn't lead to worse hurricanes. (or tornadoes, as the link in the OP discusses)
But if the global average temperature actually went down (speaking of a trend, certainly some years were very warm), then it's a different story. Asking why global warming didn't lead to an increase in storms, when there wasn't warming, that is another question. If the trend was down (and it is, since 2002), or flat (it is, since 1998), or statistically flat (it is since 1995), then the answer to "what happened/" might be, the warming stalled. That's why storms didn't increase. or some other answer.
It's exactly why I brought up the recent trends. Over the long term, the trend is warming, even if we see an 12 year slight decrease, the long term trend is still warming. But in regards to storms, you have to actually consider the climate (or global temp average), as well as the SSTs, for the years in question. Of course it's far more complicated than the simplistic nonsense some people try to pass off as science. "More heat = worse storms" isn't even close to science. Nor is "more heat=more moisture=bigger hurricanes", That shows a remarkable lack of understanding, and it's quite right to point this out.