I wouldn’t wait on a response. When somebody is trying to be understood, and make a point, they are quite happy to quote and cite what they are talking about. Vague unsubstantiated claims are the hallmark of woo woos, who hate specific and clear debates. Even when directly asked, they twist and turn, and at all cost avoid making a claim that can be investigated.
If there was an actual example, why not just use it?
The irony of it all.
Called on what? Of course we can’t tell, because there is no quote, and certainly no specific claim. That is idiocy, and one reason I am so sarcastic.
It’s not hard to quote somebody, and then comment. For example, in the thread in which some idiot claims I attacked people, post 7 says
See? It’s easy to show people what you mean, what you are speaking of.
What post of mine attacks anyone in the thread? Just quote it. Because making shit up and not providing sources is ignorant.
How that for a clear and understandable post? Anyone having trouble following?