In that thread, somebody asked me to present two facts supporting “the AGW argument”, which was actually a sidetrack and off topic, but even so, I asked them to define what they meant by “the AGW argument”. They simply refused to answer.
In fact, they insisted I define it. My response is easy to comprehend.
See how easy it is to use a cite to explain your point? Why would anyone evade and avoid just saying what they are talking about?