That’s how you can tell the difference between climate and weather.
More orange and red than blue. Q.E.D.
Again, more orange and red than blue. Definite warming trend in your cite.
Yes, because if it’s unusually warm for a month in Alaska, that means global warming.
Meh. They are your cites. Defend them, or not; your choice.
You still haven’t asked that preschooler, I see.
New Orleans is the latest victim of Global Warming. Records were shattered, and party people were not happy.
Won’t somebody think of the drunken revelers?
From the “Alaska proves global warming” school ofthought
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/alaska-experiencing-a-cold-spr/12041665
Warm winters in Alaska don’t prove global warming. There is abundant science for that. But they do offset every cite you post of cold winters, which is all you have.
According to NASA/GISS (you know them, they provide a lot of the data you don’t understand)- Yes. Yes it is.
Meanwhile, actual reality based science marches on.
or not. Stay in the pit and try to get some traction
Once more we see the desperation and deception that cherry picking can bring. Why use 1950 as a start point if it’s a long term trend? Why not 1930?
Why not show all the data? Like the last two decades?
Because it shows something they are just unable to face.
Just like the winter trends. They don’t want you to see them.
People are fucking freezing, and they are still telling them “It’s warmer than ever!”
Really? Your own data say otherwise.
Check
and mate
Um…that GISS data is showing average warming over much of the globe. Do you even read your own links?
No, he does not. For weeks, he has been posting links to maps that clearly show global warming.
Maybe this is all some sort of false flag operation where he makes climate change deniers look like brain-damaged gibbons, all the while posting links to sites which support the global warming theory. It’s the only way these threads make any sense at all.
You really are a simple creature aren’t you.
From the GISS FAQ
(bolding mine)
I’m sure you are saying a lot more bullshit about how your version of ‘science’ disproves climate change but all the rest of are hearing is “queef, queef, queef…”
It’s more like, in the face of imminent death, he decided that his last efforts should be spent making anonymous strangers realize just how fundamentally stupid he is, and assuring them he is an asshole to boot. We’re functioning like a little Make-A-Wish foundation for old douchebags.
Seems to me there is a difference between (1) which temperatures will be used as a baseline in calculating anomalies; and (2) which year will be used as a starting point in assessing temperature trends.
In theory, one could use 1951-1980 as a baseline for calculating overall anomaly but assess the overall trend starting in 1900 or 1920 or 2000 or any other year.
With records for cold being broken all over the US right now, as well as all winter, you might think the “global warming can cause more extreme weather” crowd would be considering looking hard at reality, rather than handwaving away yet another record cold winter.
Which clearly shows up on the trends.
But nope, they double down on stupid, and continue to preach from the gutter.
GIGOgalloper has been revealed to not actually be a slightly idiotic gish gallop, but just an app using lazy dishonest fuckhead, who can’t grasp that a wall of text is not the best response to a specific question, especially when the copy and paste has nothing to do with the question.
In your fevered midnight wankfests where you’re actually winning arguments, maybe.
Remind me again, what scientific discipline do you practice, Mr Scientist?