Some uniformed people think I am somehow “against” climate change, which I find laughable. Clearly the GISS data I just linked to shows climate change is happening. How much is from human activities is a question we would all like to know.
The NH summer trend shows how we are seeing this strange asymmetrical change. What is causing this?
Talk about stupid! Climate change has been happening constantly since the earth’s inception. It’s gotten colder (surely you’ve heard of ice ages) and it’s gotten warmer. Sure, there’s been a recent warming trend. And thank God. 30,000 years or so ago Manhattan was under about a mile of ice. Come to think of it, I guess that could be attributed to man, too. If only they didn’t discover how to make those damn fires to keep warm, cook food and keep away sabertooth tigers. Damn them!
On preview, I see that watch wolf has called you on your ridiculous position, as well.
The vast majority of working climate scientists agree that climate change is happening. Fact.
The evidence is enough to make over 97 percent of them agree that human activity is warming the planet. You disagreeing is based on your childish view that your ignorant bluster is the same thing as peer-reviewed science. Nonsense.
Dogma is based on assertion. Scientific consensus is based on evidence and peer-review.
You not knowing that isn’t surprising, because only someone utterly inept would think that his “gut intuition” is as good as research and study.
You are Dunning-Kruger personified. In other words, because you’re so fucking ignorant, you think that your capabilities are much more than they are.
I’m not upset. I’m just not of a mind to coddle a mewling twat what doesn’t know of which is speaks.
The science is clear, and the experts are in agreement. That an ignorant person like you is not convinced, is hardly relevant. You’re a fart in the wind.
You’re stupid and immune to facts. For this I cite your strident opposition to gay marriage, even though you have never once presented an argument not based on bigotry for its banning.
That said, because I hold hope that others reading may actually be willing and or able to be persuaded, I will address your histrionic bleating:
The Earth does vary its temperature over time. And Humanity is likely to survive any reasonable variation.
But survival isn’t the same thing as thriving. The Earth has been both hotter and colder in the past, sure. But we have constructed our civilization, now. With the current coastlines and with cities in their current places. If we artificially raise the temperature of the world (which we are doing, at least according to the vast majority of experts) then we jeopardize the current situation.
Consider if a coastal city is flooded. The people must go somewhere. Suddenly there is a huge shock to economies as the displaced go swarming inland. This is a bad thing. Consider if the water that supplies the western US dries up. Without water you could displace tens of millions of Americans. Or necessitate huge construction of desalinization projects that would balloon our deficits.
This is a perfect example of your problem. You don’t understand the concept of more. A pinky up the ass or an elephant leg. It’s all the same to friend Brazil.
Looks more like IPCC shit to me . . . but please, giggle away.
I look forward to giggling in 10 or 15 years when their latest predictions turn out to have been way off. Just like their predictions from the 90s turned out to have been way off.
As an argument against anthropogenic climate change, this is about at the level of “If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?” as an argument against evolution. You could hardly post anything to make you look stupider. But it’s clear you don’t care about either looking, or being, stupid.
Which probably explains what you’re able to display it with such grace. But what an interesting piece of performance art: a Moderator with poor reading comprehension. For a follow-up, may I suggest Modding with a banana in one hand and a chainsaw in the other.
In the meantime, perhaps you’d care to show me where I’ve denied the existence of AGW.
Are you seriously saying that ALL global warming is caused by man-kind, and that there is NO natural climate change? Why the fuck are you blaming women as well? All we’re asking is what part of global warming is caused by man-types. If you think it stupid to ask, then pray to your scientist overlords and do exact what they say … and turn off your goddamn air conditioner, poisoner.
The latest predictions from the IPCC: We’ll be experiencing both bone-dry droughts AND killing floods !!! Hundreds of billions of peoples will be forced from their homes and cities from rising sea-levels !!! Okay, these thing HAVE BEEN HAPPENING for the past 10,000 years without any help from men (or women).
The arguments against evolution are: 1] We don’t currently don’t have the chemical equations for the reactions at took chemicals that aren’t life and made them chemicals that are life, 2] Life evolving on Earth is unique in the universe (Fermi’s paradox), and 3] Dumbasses confuse extraordinary usefulness with scientific proof, like Newton’s Laws of Motion.
A little cold, mods don’t get paid to take the abuse for being a mod.
The 1990s ??? You must be young, everything in the IPCC was known back in the 1970s, when your parents were in diapers. Did you know there were solar panels on the White House roof back then? Geez … I got my start in business doing the weatherization program in the early 80s. Burning fossil fuels is bad, real bad … and your pathetic complaints about CO[sub]2[/sub] emissions run way short of traction, it’s about as minor as hair falling out from cancer treatment. Go swimming in Galviston Bay right now, dumbass.
By the way, I believe in AGW if it is defined as the claim that mankind’s activities are likely to cause an increase in global surface temperatures.
Unfortunately, many, perhaps most warmers don’t have a clear understanding of what they believe in so fervently. So it’s impossible to engage with them rationally.
This is quite evident when the ardent warmer declares, and I think they actually mean it, that “nobody predicted winters would become warmer, due to AGW”.
Of course if we were still seeing a rapid warming trend for NH winters, they would just as ardently declare it proves AGW is happening. Which is why AGW appears as pseudoscience, rather than science.
He contributed his incredible stupidity as a poster. He either can’t read or he’s trying to put words in my mouth. Possibly both. While I would have taken him to task for this regardless of his position, the fact that he holds such a position while exhibiting such exceeding dumbassness and/or dishonesty makes his trip to Stupid Town all that much more WTF and worthy of being called out.
