Eh, I figure any excuse to remind people you’re a tard is nice.
Yeah, see, it’s not that I don’t believe that there are people dumb enough to still believe that climategate was a huge scandal or that it had anything more to add to the discussion than “boy, aren’t those on the denialist side dishonest shitbags” (which we already knew, thank you, although this threw it into stark contrast).
What I don’t buy is that they exist here. On this forum. That seems ostensibly not to cater to syphilitic inbreds. Way to drag the average down, asshole. I mean, if there was anything to discuss, I’d gladly do so, but there isn’t. Climategate has been done to death by people way smarter than you (or Delingpole, that ignoble twat).
Hey I know, maybe next FX will bring up how there was a cooling trend predicted in 1970. And for his encore performance, he can get into how Darwin recanted his theory on his deathbed.
One thing I know for sure. The warmistas have such little knowledge of climate science, they probably think this thread is getting old. In reality, it’s just starting up.
Since any fuckhead can just Google anything, I know good and damn well to always have a source, and I even link to them. Fuckheads of the world don’t understand this.
Not sure what your point is here, are you pointing out that there was such a prediction, or trying to insinuate from the empty search that there was not?
If the former, then not only did you do a bad job of it, you also have no idea what it means, if the latter, then putting the phrase in quotes limited you search a bit, try adding a ‘s’ to trends and that’ll add a bunch more results, or just removing the quotes entirely.
Some fuckhead claimed I might bring up something, so I pointed out that the only place it actually existed (what he claimed that is), was in the fuckhead post.
Take that 2012 paper I mentioned about a dozen times now. They say the cooling trend for boreal winters goes back two and half decades. That means 1987, since it was a 2012 paper.
And I’ll be goddamned if whe I checked,that trend shows up clear as day. It might seem funny, but that don’t mean it ain’t the gosh darn truth, right there on the offical page and everything.
Now how is a global warmists gonna deal with that? Old GIOgalloper done run off when he seen that, since scepticalscience don’t have nothing on it for him to cut and paste.
Ah course we can runthat trend out to 2013, it don’t matter much. And goddamn if them February temperatures have actually been going down, just like people out in the weather, you know, working people, just like they noticed.
Which makes them warministas, (who a kept a tellin everyone it was getting warmer and how you people just don’t know jackshit about climate), well it makes them look like damn fools is what it does.
Cause everyone who ever heard some warmer talk, knows they been going on about global warming for 25 years now, saying the winters was gonna get warmer, with less snow. Now when you look at the data and see that cooling trend, that is goddamn fucking hilarious, I don’t care who you are.
But the real joke? That would be the more recent trend for NH winters, say the period that even the global mean started dropping, rather than rising.
2002-present
Ya hear the yammering damn fools telling us the warming ain’t stopped, all kinds of damn fool claims, just go read some GIGOgalloping, they never shut the fuck up about it.
Meanwhile, even the goddamn GISS temps, which always show more increase than any other dataset, even GISS shows what is up.
What exactly does this graph show that proves a point even tangentially relevant? This graph indicates that over a 25 year period, a small minority of areas have seen a small amount of cooling, most have seen a small amount of warming, and a few have seen drastic warming. This graph in of itself certainly does not prove a warming trend, as it is extremely simplistic, and lacks detail and data that would be much more useful in predicting future trends, but it most certainly does not in any way provide any support to your idea of a cooling trend. Not at all. To imply that it does can only be taken as another one of your attempts at humor.
You have added more graphs, that all still show a moderate warming trend over their relevant time periods, it still only goes to undercut your position rather than support it.
If you have a different take on it, can you explain how it supports your position?
I just bet you ain’t been following the threat at all. Here’s some science papers, not that I think you will read them and become smart. But still, I’m all about helping.
Simple version, the trend of colder NH winters directly contradicts the global warming theory that assumes the arctic feedback and physics of GhGs predict the most warming will occur in the boreal winters.
