You are in such a terrible predicament. You are claiming there is “nothing there”, something you can’t possibly prove, much less would any sane person consider the vast content involved as “nothing”. Your closed mind is obvious, no need for any peer reviwed science on that.
Hence your baiting is of a singular and lonely kind, and best ignored.
The finding that there were multiple violations of the law was clear and with out reservation. That the spirit of the law was so scoffed at, and the efforts involved in avoiding the truth so obvious, nothing anyone can say will change what is in the emails. There is your terrible situation.
Oh look, more stupid pontificating bullshit to dodge the facts. Hey asshole, you know, you could have just linked to an email or two and said maybe a paragraph on what you thought they meant a page or two ago. Would have saved us all a lot of your stupidity. :rolleyes: Instead, you decide to claim that the demand is somehow beneath you, that there were multiple violations of the law (despite what the 7 independent scientific investigations had to say on the matter), and just decide to look like a fucking moron. Nice one. Stay classy, FXShitForBrains. Stay classy.
Y’know, Fear Itself, you had a golden opportunity to spell out what hypothetical evidence you figure would count against your position waaaaay back on page 26: you for some reason brought it up, and then – when repeatedly asked – failed to give specifics.
If you’d backed up your empty claim, this latest post of yours would be terrific: you’d have every right to point at this as evidence for your position, if you’d mentioned that the opposite would’ve been evidence against your position. It’s a shame, really.
But it’s not too late for you to get it right: just mention what could happen to prove you wrong. Tell us what would be inconsistent with your predictions, so it’ll actually mean something when you say thus-and-such is consistent with 'em. Can you do that?
Sure. Just post statistics on global climate patterns that contradict the overwhelming evidence that the earth is warming. No one has done that so far, it has been nothing but cherry-picked cold weather reports that prove nothing. The pattern world-wide has been a warming trend for over sixty years. Dozens of studies have supported that.
All climate change deniers have to do is present world-wide records that contradict that. But they won’t, because they can’t, so they resort to cherry-picked weather reports.
Instead of posting a link to climate data and noting the trend.
Because Anchorage was warmer in the seventies than it is now, which is easy to find out. So a thirty degree mean, with rain instead of snow, isn’t even an unusual event there.
Poor GIGO, I wouldn’t call him a liar, even in the pit. To lie, you have to know truth from fiction, and deliberately and knowingly deceive, or tell a falsehood. Which he just isn’t capable of.
But Jesus fuck on a pogo stick, now describing a false claim by some fuckhead out on the internet is considered “calling me a liar”. and we have been warned.
Yes, yes you do. If you let yourself get sucked into every shitheads game online, there is no time for fun. And if it’s not fun, why the fuck would anyone waste even a minute on something, that they don’t enjoy?