# Immigration--Why not just let anyone become a citizen who wants to?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 6, 2011, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990 "2011-07-06T03:17:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2011, 7:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/21 "2011-07-06T19:25:27Z")

</div>

“Degenerates.” Perhaps this means hominids that have devolved to subhuman character: Bonobos, Picts, Sicilians, NASCAR fen, and the Irish.

“Perverts.” Ho Mo Sexuals, Poets, Greeks, Mormons, also the Irish.

“Terrorists.” The rebels who ran the Loyalists out of the colonies, Sicilians, also the Irish.

“The Criminal Class.” Sicilians, the Irish (again), Ku Kluxers.

So clearly we need to keep out the Sicilians and the Irish. Not sure where we’re supposed to send the NASCAR fen, Mormons, “patriots,” and Ku Kluxers, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2011, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/22 "2011-07-06T19:34:30Z")

</div>

More seriously, I’m disturbed by the idea that we want the world’s best and brightest here–the idea that we would condemn other nations to mediocrity while bringing the best of the best to enrich ourselves. How does that help grow the world economy?

Of course, considering that for centuries we were populated by the dregs of Europe, perhaps it’s a corrective. But what shall our comparatively unimpressive natives think of immigration by the elite minds of the world? 😛

Hopefully other countries are also recruiting sharp minds to improve their countries. But who builds up poor countries?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AntiCoyote](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a587f6/32.png) [@AntiCoyote](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AntiCoyote)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2011, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/23 "2011-07-06T20:20:12Z")

</div>

What I find confusing is why people can’t see the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

We need to set up a system where as immigrants can only stay a short time. Say five years after they give up their citizenship and become Americans or return home. None of this dual citizenship stuff. Either you want to be part of this country or not. You can’t have it both ways.

If a job is open and an American can do it, the company should have to explain in detail, why this job isn’t being filled by an American. This is common in other countries. Unless your a highly skilled person like a doctor, there are too many Americans to fill these jobs.

Why should the managers at my Target or Kmart be from Mexico and Canada when we have Americans who could do that job. Why don’t they have that job. It’s a good job. People want it, so why isn’t it filled by an American?

This country was founded by immigrants but it was a different time. We needed people to fill an underpopulated nation. We are not underpopulated now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2011, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/24 "2011-07-06T20:35:02Z")

</div>

> [@AntiCoyote](#):
>
> What I find confusing is why people can’t see the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

It’s an arbitrary, self-imposed difference. This question is asking why we should maintain that difference. Simply saying that the difference exists (because we’ve put it there) does not answer the question. Why not just make all, or almost all, immigration readily legal, and in this way, eliminate illegal immigration? Though your opposition to such a policy has been made clear, you still have not provided any answers to this question.

> [@AntiCoyote](#):
>
> Why should the managers at my Target or Kmart be from Mexico and Canada when we have Americans who could do that job. Why don’t they have that job. It’s a good job. People want it, so why isn’t it filled by an American?

If the person offering that job wants to give it to someone who happens to not be an American (or a current American), why shouldn’t they be able to? Why should being American bestow upon you the right to preferential treatment?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2011, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/25 "2011-07-06T23:24:05Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> Amusing how this argument is made by Irish Catholics, Italian-Americans, Armenian-Americans, & apparently now Korean-Americans
> 
> Dude, we let _your_ ancestors in. It’s OK.None of that requires quotas though.

I don’t mind any ethnic group provided its in reasonable numbers, and I want quotas (based not on nationality but such factors as income and skills) so we get the best and brightest of the planet not people who will leech off our generous systems of welfare and education.

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> Athena help me, but I tend to agree with this sentence, though I’d not have worded it quite that way. In particular speaking of “the Republic” that way strikes me as a bit unseemly nowadays. For reasons I have difficulty articulating it seems – how to put it? – a tad too _America is history’s greatest nation and the right hand of Jesus_ in its implications.
> 
> Okay, I’ll bite. What “degenerates & perverts” do you want screened out? Homosexuals?
> 
> And what the hell is the “criminal class,” exactly? That is, do you mean persons who have committed major felonies, or do you persons the social group from which felons are most likely to come?

Felons certainly. Also those those who have any history with a criminal organization or terrorist group, and some others

> [@Indistinguishable](#):
>
> It’s an arbitrary, self-imposed difference. This question is asking why we should maintain that difference. Simply saying that the difference exists (because we’ve put it there) does not answer the question. Why not just make all, or almost all, immigration readily legal, and in this way, eliminate illegal immigration? Though your opposition to such a policy has been made clear, you still have not provided any answers to this question.

So are you saying anyone who wants to come to the US can just come in without regards to our economic situation. We will get California x100 or x1000. Of course provided some smart politician gets such a law passed he’ll practically rule the mobs.

> [@](#):
>
> If the person offering that job wants to give it to someone who happens to not be an American (or a current American), why shouldn’t they be able to? Why should being American bestow upon you the right to preferential treatment?

Its a form of affirmative action.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flickster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7bcc69/32.png) [@flickster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flickster)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2011, 5:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/26 "2011-07-07T05:11:26Z")

</div>

> [@Indistinguishable](#):
>
> It’s an arbitrary, self-imposed difference. This question is asking why we should maintain that difference. Simply saying that the difference exists (because we’ve put it there) does not answer the question. Why not just make all, or almost all, immigration readily legal, and in this way, eliminate illegal immigration? Though your opposition to such a policy has been made clear, you still have not provided any answers to this question.
> 
> If the person offering that job wants to give it to someone who happens to not be an American (or a current American), why shouldn’t they be able to? Why should being American bestow upon you the right to preferential treatment?

It’s not arbitrary at all. Arbitrary ended when we became a society of mass entitlements which, at the end of the day, somebody has to pay for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2011, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/27 "2011-07-07T20:55:34Z")

</div>

So, keeping low-class migrant workers out of benefits is “affirmative action”? Yeah, in the same sense as Jim Crow.

Good grief, people, do you read your history?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2011, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/28 "2011-07-07T23:48:07Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> So, keeping low-class migrant workers out of benefits is “affirmative action”? Yeah, in the same sense as Jim Crow.
> 
> Good grief, people, do you read your history?

No it just means American citizens will have priority. And if they can’t get a job they don’t have to come over here in the first place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Indistinguishable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/90ced4/32.png) [@Indistinguishable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Indistinguishable)\
**Post date:** [July 7, 2011, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/29 "2011-07-07T23:57:58Z")

</div>

But why? Adopting the same idea, should Californian employers be forced against their will to give preferential hiring status to native-born Californians? I would find it rather an exorbitant cost to obstruct the flow of human resources in this way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/30 "2011-07-08T00:46:06Z")

</div>

> [@foolsguinea](#):
>
> So clearly we need to keep out the Sicilians and the Irish. Not sure where we’re supposed to send the NASCAR fen, Mormons, “patriots,” and Ku Kluxers, though.

Send them all to Ireland and Sicily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/31 "2011-07-08T04:01:31Z")

</div>

> [@Indistinguishable](#):
>
> But why? Adopting the same idea, should Californian employers be forced against their will to give preferential hiring status to native-born Californians? I would find it rather an exorbitant cost to obstruct the flow of human resources in this way.

Obstruct? If they need more people they’re going to hire non-American citizens anyway, so what’s the difference?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 4:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/32 "2011-07-08T04:41:31Z")

</div>

> [@JThunder](#):
>
> They do tend to work, partly because there _are_ requirements for both immigration and citizenship. In other words, they don’t let just anyone live and work here, much less obtain the benefits of citizenship. If they were to offer citizenship to everyone regardless of one’s background or qualification, then all bets would be off.

They work because, like everyone else, they have to.

I’m curious. Why is there a difference between imigrating from Mexico to the USA and immigrating from Michigan to New York?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 6:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/33 "2011-07-08T06:01:22Z")

</div>

Here’s an objection to unrestricted immigration: infrastructure. There’s only so fast you can build roads or sewer systems or apartment buildings, so you can’t just flood cities with millions of new people every year. Particular since it’s a big fight to get any basic infrastructure issues dealt with in this country. If we had a better commitment to infrastructure, I’d be amenable to increasing the immigration quotas, but even then, you’d still have to cap it somewhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![YogSothoth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/8edcca/32.png) [@YogSothoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/YogSothoth)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/34 "2011-07-08T06:20:33Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> You also need to consider that a stable and productive population is what allows for a stable and productive economy. Imagine what would happen to prices if a disaster in a foreign country caused millions of refugees to suddenly cross the border in search of food and shelter? This exact thing happens in Africa all the time (currently in Somalia, among other places).

Couldn’t the government just pass some kind of protection law forcing prices to remain the same?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 6:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/35 "2011-07-08T06:51:39Z")

</div>

> [@RandMcnally](#):
>
> This it true, but IRT Homestead Act, it was given freely to Whites, which I think is important. The United States wanted immigration and for the land to be cultivated, but only by a certain type of people. Not just anyone.

The Homestead Act’s provision was for “any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his declaration of intention to become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United States, and who has never borne arms against the United States Government or given aid and comfort to its enemies. . .”

There was no racial restrictions, and non-whites could and did homestead. The provision tended to exclude non-white immigrants, who couldn’t generally become citizens, but there was nothing preventing non-whites who were citizens born in this country from taking advantage of the Homestead Act, and a lot of blacks, at least, did.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 12:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/36 "2011-07-08T12:21:54Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> No it just means American citizens will have priority. And if they can’t get a job they don’t have to come over here in the first place.

So wait, in your world first you find a job in the country you want to emigrate to, then you’re allowed to go ? That seems logistically problematic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/37 "2011-07-08T13:19:22Z")

</div>

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> I dunno, what are some good reasons for giving every dollar you have to everyone that walks down the street?

We await your report.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/38 "2011-07-08T13:20:44Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> So wait, in your world first you find a job in the country you want to emigrate to, then you’re allowed to go ? That seems logistically problematic.

**Within** America, people often move to another state/city after, and because of, finding a job there – but, you’re right, wouldn’t be so simple across international borders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/39 "2011-07-08T13:22:48Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> I’m curious. Why is there a difference between imigrating from Mexico to the USA and immigrating from Michigan to New York?

The difference is that the Mexican has a better chance than the Michigander of finding someone there who speaks his language. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2011, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990/40 "2011-07-08T14:10:10Z")

</div>

> [@BrightNShiny](#):
>
> Here’s an objection to unrestricted immigration: infrastructure. There’s only so fast you can build roads or sewer systems or apartment buildings, so you can’t just flood cities with millions of new people every year. Particular since it’s a big fight to get any basic infrastructure issues dealt with in this country. If we had a better commitment to infrastructure, I’d be amenable to increasing the immigration quotas, but even then, you’d still have to cap it somewhere.

Again, it goes back to the gated community analogy. We don’t want unwashed masses of poor people huddling around our cities in favellas and shantytowns.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immigration-why-not-just-let-anyone-become-a-citizen-who-wants-to/587990.md?page=3)
