# Immoderate moderator?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [December 28, 2000, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594 "2000-12-28T23:52:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2000, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/1 "2000-12-28T23:52:45Z")

</div>

Is it just me, or is [this moderator’s response](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=52954) a bit beyond the pale?

I do appreciate what the moderators do here, for very little appreciation, but aren’t they subject to a certain SDMB etiquette like the rest of us?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SmackFu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/53a042/32.png) [@SmackFu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SmackFu)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 12:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/2 "2000-12-29T00:21:04Z")

</div>

I do believe that you must reference this thread as well:

[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=52925](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=52925)

Would **you** open a new topic to reply to a crummy closed thread by a banned poster?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/3 "2000-12-29T00:28:02Z")

</div>

No; but compare my post count to mobo85’s. And the thread you referenced was closed with only the most cryptic of comments by the moderator. Would you have had any idea what was going on if you were a relative newbie?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duck\_Duck\_Goose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/50afbb/32.png) [@Duck\_Duck\_Goose](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duck_Duck_Goose)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/4 "2000-12-29T00:37:02Z")

</div>

A. What **Smackfu** said.  
B. The place for all criticism of moderators is in the Pit, not ATMB. 😉  
C. I thought **Manhattan** expressed himself with truly stupendous self-restraint, for him. **Mobo’s** damn lucky, if you ask me.  
D. Good point about the newbies. However, one might reasonably expect them to keep their wide little eyes open and observe, and thus come to eventual wisdom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 12:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/5 "2000-12-29T00:49:15Z")

</div>

[list=A][li]:rolleyes:[/li][li]This wasn’t intended as a “complaints and other discussion regarding administration of the SDMB” exactly, as the description of the Pit delineates, but as “questions and concerns about the SDMB,” as this forum is described. I have no intention of opening this in the Pit, as I have no intention of flaming Manhattan regarding this issue; it was an honest inquiry. If I should have emailed an administrator instead, I’m sorry; I thought this was the proper forum for such a question.[/li][li]If you consider “I really don’t need this shit if the membership is not going to cooperate”–as a response to someone who was quite obviously making an innocent mistake in his attempt to be helpful–to be “stupendous self-restraint,” then I’m glad I’m not married to you.[/li][li]How wide open would you expect newbies to remain if this is the kind of kneejerk feedback they can expect from the mods?[/li]Thanks, DDG and smackfu, for expressing yourselves, but I wasn’t really seeking your particular opinions (though I’m thrilled to death of course to have them): I was asking a question regarding the actual rules, if any, for moderators’ conduct in the boards.[/list]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Una\_Persson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/una_persson/32/346_2.png) [@Una\_Persson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Una_Persson)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/6 "2000-12-29T01:11:39Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by lissener \*  
> **This wasn’t intended as a “complaints and other discussion regarding administration of the SDMB” exactly, as the description of the Pit delineates, but as “questions and concerns about the SDMB,” as this forum is described. I have no intention of opening this in the Pit, as I have no intention of flaming Manhattan regarding this issue; it was an honest inquiry. If I should have emailed an administrator instead, I’m sorry; I thought this was the proper forum for such a question.**

The Pit IS intended for questions concerning the moderation of the Board. And these questions need not have any flaming or complaining content whatsoever, such as the following thread:

[Why was the Hotwire Thread Locked?](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=48632)

> [@](#):
>
> **Thanks, DDG and smackfu, for expressing yourselves, but I wasn’t really seeking your particular opinions…**

Then like you already said…you should have e-mailed. If you post something in a public forum, people will answer. Like myself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/7 "2000-12-29T04:28:23Z")

</div>

Okay, I’m gonna try this one time. If this don’t get it for you, I’ll move the thread to the Pit and you can continue there.

For the most part our moderators and adminstrators do do the voodoo that they do so well in good disposition. However, occasionally they encounter a member of the Teeming Millions that thinks rules are for other people . . . that plays the fool . . . that gets off on the bad foot and keeps on going that way, even after being asked multiple times to shape up.

We get really irritated with these folks, especially if we’ve tried to show them better ways and they just ain’t listening.

While we’re sometimes capable of leaping tall buildings at a single bound and some of us are faster than a speeding bullet, none of us have much patience with repeated idiocy and/or continued annoyance and will get cranky at times. We’re very human and mostly, under the circumstances, we’re entitled. There’s been posters here that would make Jesus cry.

Not only are moderators and administrators expected to live by the same rules as the Teeming Millions, they’re actually held to a higher standard, as all too often circumstances are such that they can’t truly drop the gloves and defend themselves like the Teemsters can do. It takes a very special person to grit their teeth in the face of that kind of abuse and keep on doing their job. Under those circumstances, an occasional pithy comment or sharp statement is understandable.

your humble TubaDiva  
Administrator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SPOOFE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@SPOOFE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SPOOFE)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 10:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/8 "2000-12-29T10:59:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> There’s been posters here that would make Jesus cry.

Look, I’m sorry about that already! How was I supposed to know he had a traumatic childhood experience involving toothpaste, too?!?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duck\_Duck\_Goose](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/50afbb/32.png) [@Duck\_Duck\_Goose](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duck_Duck_Goose)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/9 "2000-12-29T13:59:10Z")

</div>

C. Hey, come on, **Lissener,** you’ve been here longer than I have. You’ve seen how quick Manny is to flick the switchblade open and start slicing. IMO, **Mobo** should glance down below his bellybutton and say a silent prayer of thanks to the God of Cojones, whoever he may be. FWIW, I didn’t interpret the thread as “someone who was quite obviously making an innocent mistake in his attempt to be helpful”–instead, I saw someone making a rather feeble attempt at humor. Any other mod would have probably shrugged and said, “Okay, very funny, ha ha” and simply locked the thread. But **Manhattan,** being the person he is, switched on the flamethrower and made a couple of 10 meter sweeps. So **Mobo’s** a little singed around the edges, but happy to be alive, and hopefully a little wiser for the experience. I’ve felt the touch of Manny’s flamethrower myself a few times, and I didn’t run to the Pit and start whining about it, and hopefully **I’m** a little wiser for the experience.

D. I would expect newbies to learn that this is the kind of kneejerk feedback they can expect from Manhattan, the same way I would expect them to learn that if they put their finger in a light socket, they’re gonna get a shock. “Don’t screw around in GQ” is the lesson here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TVeblen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/4bbf92/32.png) [@TVeblen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TVeblen)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/10 "2000-12-29T18:14:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by lissener \*  
> \*\*…the thread you referenced was closed with only the most cryptic of comments by the moderator. Would you have had any idea what was going on if you were a relative newbie? \*\*

This will be brief; I’m busily ordering a 5 lb. box of Godiva chocolates for TubaDiva at the moment.

Not busting your chops for human curiosity, **lissener** , but the reasons for some actions won’t be obvious. This place is too big and too busy for consensus on everything. That’s why “troll outing” was stopped: it ate up bandwidth, caused ill will and frankly didn’t solve much.

Let’s face it: most people don’t read every post in every thread in every forum. But moderators are assigned to various beats, and talk to each another. So there’s an overview happening, okay? Innocent, occassional goofs happen, but chronic offenders are usually warned individually and privately. It gives them a chance to clean up their act, and reduces pointless bloodshed on the boards.

We _want_ posters, so clobbering someone for flagrant idiocy is a last resort. If someone gets their leash yanked, it sure wasn’t the first time.

Veb

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starbury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f04885/32.png) [@Starbury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starbury)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/11 "2000-12-29T21:02:36Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by TVeblen \*
> 
> Not busting your chops for human curiosity, **lissener** , but the reasons for some actions won’t be obvious. This place is too big and too busy for consensus on everything.

That’s certainly understandable, but in a context similar to this one, is it fair to berate a relatively new user for not knowing the attitude the moderators’ have toward a specific user? I suspect that one sentence explaining the initial thread locking would have prevented the second thread from being created – not because the moderators need to justify their actions, just to clear up confusion.

It seemed that **Mobo** was raising another question that occurred in the (first) locked thread, rather than intentionally defying a moderator. It just seems like it makes this message board very uninviting for newer users if they are going to be admonished for not knowing who ‘dippy’ is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yojimbo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yojimbo/32/232_2.png) [@yojimbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yojimbo)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/12 "2000-12-29T21:29:29Z")

</div>

The only problem I have with this is that I’d have done what **Mobo** did if there was something in the locked thread that interested me and I know who **dippy** is.

Why? I hear you all saying, would I do such a thing. Well because of this.

> [@](#):
>
> _By manhattan_:  
> All threads started by smartt have been hidden for the time being. They will likely be deleted permanently soon. My theory is that without the psychic reward of seeing responses to him (not to mention the frustration of his failed effort of 95 or so posts) will discourage him from returning to this forum.
> 
> In responding to those thread, several GQ members made excellent posts, chock full of ignorance eradicating information. To each of you, I can only apologize. But there is no way that someone like that is going to dominate this forum (or anywhere else on the board). **If any of you has interest in any of the subject matter of his threads, (:: sigh :: even the prurient ones), please feel free to re-open any topic.**

Bolding mine. From [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=44573](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=44573)

While this situation is not exactly the same I would have thought I was ok in starting a thread about something that came up in a locked or deleted thread once it was within the rules of the board.

Now I don’t know what to think. 😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2000, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/13 "2000-12-29T23:48:12Z")

</div>

Manhattan meant what he said: posts on topics that are worthwhile. That also means forum appropriate too.

It looks like what Mobo did was re-open a topic that was not on a GQ-worthy subject but rather was started by a problem child with the express intention of irritating the moderators.

your humble TubaDiva  
Administrator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ad\_Noctum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@Ad\_Noctum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ad_Noctum)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2000, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/14 "2000-12-30T20:54:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> For the most part our moderators and adminstrators do do the voodoo that they do so well in good disposition.

there’s a sig-line and a half!!!

but seriously,  
I think we should’ve gotten Manhattan in here to clarify his post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ad\_Noctum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b19c9b/32.png) [@Ad\_Noctum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ad_Noctum)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2000, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/15 "2000-12-30T20:55:14Z")

</div>

but then again, that guy looks a lot like he’s just trolling, as Tubadiva said, and just looking to get a rise out of the mods…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ukulele\_Ike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/df788c/32.png) [@Ukulele\_Ike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ukulele_Ike)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2000, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/immoderate-moderator/47594/16 "2000-12-30T23:08:51Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Ad Noctum \*  
> \*\*I think we should’ve gotten Manhattan in here to clarify his post. \*\*

Well, **manhattan** would normally be delighted to drop in here and have a chat about good manners with **lissener,** but at the moment he’s busy down in the basement, plunging out the guest sdorgi.
