# "Impact" as a verb, yea or nay?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [June 30, 2010, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097 "2010-06-30T18:28:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isamu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/7c8e57/32.png) [@Isamu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isamu)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/21 "2010-07-01T01:33:26Z")

</div>

Nay, nay nay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uncle\_Brother\_Walker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f08c70/32.png) [@Uncle\_Brother\_Walker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncle_Brother_Walker)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/22 "2010-07-01T02:24:24Z")

</div>

That’s what they taught us in Artillery school.

“Rounds impact on the surface of the earth” is an example. They don’t hit the ground. They don’t land on target. They impact (whatever it is you’re shooting at\*).

Hearing this in business speak makes me want to have rounds impact upon the speaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/23 "2010-07-01T02:36:37Z")

</div>

The usage is nearly 100 years old. Why object to it now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimmy_Gibbler)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/24 "2010-07-01T02:44:49Z")

</div>

I try to avoid it myself, but it doesn’t make me look askance when others use it (unlike the case with, say, “quality” as an adjective, which is truly awful).

I do wonder if those who are so vociferous against “impact” as a verb feel the same way about “access” as a verb—another old prohibition whose cause is now totally lost these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Kimmy\_Gibbler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimmy_Gibbler)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/25 "2010-07-01T02:47:14Z")

</div>

> [@Uncle\_Brother\_Walker](#):
>
> That’s what they taught us in Artillery school.
> 
> “Rounds impact on the surface of the earth” is an example. They don’t hit the ground. They don’t land on target. They impact (whatever it is you’re shooting at\*).
> 
> Hearing this in business speak makes me want to have rounds impact upon the speaker.

I think if any group is more notorious for butchering the English language than the mercantile set, it’s the military (“nucular” is pure Pentagon). “Rounds impact on the surface of the earth” sounds a lot worse to me than “The recent anomalous weather events in Florida will impact the price of OJ futures for at least the next few months.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superhal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Superhal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superhal)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/26 "2010-07-01T02:50:46Z")

</div>

I voted “no.” While [dictionary.com](http://dictionary.com) does list a verb form, I find myself hard pressed to find “the cars impacted” to make much sense.

Note: to anyone thinking “an impacted tooth” is a verb use, it’s not. It’s the adjective form, although the regular -ed ending to make an adjective out of a verb does imply that a verb form exists. However, there are several words that do this where the verb form is no longer in use, e.g. peopled. The verb “to people” has been replaced by “to populate.”

Hmm, in terms of affect, “to impact” sounds fine as mentioned above.

Defined as “to affect,” “to impact” would be ok.  
Defined as “to collide,” I think the use has gone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2010, 3:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097/27 "2010-07-01T03:02:27Z")

</div>

If there is a dialect of English that uses impact as a verb then among speakers of that dialect, using impact as a verb would be acceptable.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impact-as-a-verb-yea-or-nay/545097.md?page=1)
