# Impeachment proceedings...will they happen?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [April 19, 2019, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795 "2019-04-19T23:08:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 2:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/461 "2019-05-06T02:45:24Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> Loss of territory might move the needle, too.
> 
> North Korea is flexing its missile might over the Pacific, and Vlad would like to take possession of Alaskan oil fields. If it became known that Donald rolled over on sovereignty of Guam or Prudhoe Bay, that might bother some of his fans.

This is such a bizarre hypothetical. A sustained invasion of US territory is most likely to be accomplished by aliens (the outer space kind), to give you some idea of the odds, but if some earthly nation we’re foolish enough to try it, I’m sure President Trump would be delighted to order the military to slap the shit out of them and enjoy the approval ratings jump that would accompany such an action.

ETA: to put it in perspective, the military, under President Trump killed a few hundred Russians for trying to invade our corner of fuckin’ Syria! The idea that he’d “roll over” if they invaded Alaska is laughably absurd.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 11:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/462 "2019-05-06T11:27:04Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> ETA: to put it in perspective, the military, under President Trump killed a few hundred Russians for trying to invade our corner of fuckin’ Syria! The idea that he’d “roll over” if they invaded Alaska is laughably absurd.

Yeah, um… you do understand, that’s kind of literally how hypotheticals work? Imagining the chain of events to get us to a certain outcome? There are no realities in which Trump’s delusional, fanatical base abandons him unless we inject some absurd contingencies.

You might reflect a bit on the different uses of ‘hypothetical’ vs. ‘prediction’. I know, I know, you’re just saying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 12:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/463 "2019-05-06T12:04:19Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> Quite correct. But they can understand ‘what was US land now belongs to another nation.’ They would try to rationalize it. But it would bother them, nonetheless.

If they can’t be bothered by a president who supplicates to Vladimir Putin and risks tossing away NATO, then I have a hard time believing they’d be remotely bothered by losing Guam or anything that Trump offers up to Putin short of authorizing the possession of their family farms, their SUVs, or their gun collections.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/464 "2019-05-06T14:41:19Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> I doubt they could even find those places on a map.

Back in a Presidential election in another lifetime, control of Quemoy and Matsu was a big issue. No, really!

And hardly anyone could’ve found them on a map, either, especially with Google being a few decades away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 11:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/465 "2019-05-06T23:35:40Z")

</div>

“[I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.](https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/06/al_green_im_concerned_if_we_dont_impeach_this_president_he_will_get_re-elected.html)” - Al Green (D-TX) on May 4, 2019

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banquet\_Bear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banquet_bear/32/373_2.png) [@Banquet\_Bear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banquet_Bear)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/466 "2019-05-06T23:41:49Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> “[I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.](https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/06/al_green_im_concerned_if_we_dont_impeach_this_president_he_will_get_re-elected.html)” - Al Green (D-TX) on May 4, 2019

…do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Representative for Texas’s 9th congressional district?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/467 "2019-05-06T23:51:34Z")

</div>

I believe Louis Gohmert, of TX 1st District (Greater Metropolitan Tyler, Texas), esteemed colleague, also shares that opinion. Not everybody knows that, but now you do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2019, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/468 "2019-05-06T23:53:05Z")

</div>

> [@Banquet\_Bear](#):
>
> …do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Representative for Texas’s 9th congressional district?

I would not use the word “concerned”, and I think he’s likely to get re-elected regardless of whether they impeach him or not, so, overall, I guess I’d rate that a “disagree”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/469 "2019-05-07T00:19:38Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> “[I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.](https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/06/al_green_im_concerned_if_we_dont_impeach_this_president_he_will_get_re-elected.html)” - Al Green (D-TX) on May 4, 2019

One thing I would say is that it would be wrong to hold back impeachment as a way of reversing the next election, should Trump win it.

So that means that if we’re going to impeach him for things we already know about, the time to do it is in 2019, not in 2021. (If evidence is found later of additional crimes we don’t now know about, they’d be fair game.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/470 "2019-05-07T02:36:02Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> One thing I would say is that it would be wrong to hold back impeachment as a way of reversing the next election, should Trump win it.
> 
> So that means that if we’re going to impeach him for things we already know about, the time to do it is in 2019, not in 2021. (If evidence is found later of additional crimes we don’t now know about, they’d be fair game.)

I agree with you (except perhaps with the phrasing of “additional crimes”), but the Dems are no more likely to get to 67 Senate votes in 2021 than they are in 2019, at least based on what we already know about, so it doesn’t really matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 11:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/471 "2019-05-07T11:36:58Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> I agree with you (except perhaps with the phrasing of “additional crimes”), but the Dems are no more likely to get to 67 Senate votes in 2021 than they are in 2019, at least based on what we already know about, so it doesn’t really matter.

Impeachment proceedings matter, even if they don’t culminate in the removal of a President. They should be treated as serious business, and should not become just another political cudgel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/budget_player_cadet/32/205_2.png) [@Budget\_Player\_Cadet](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Budget_Player_Cadet)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/472 "2019-05-07T11:45:16Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> “[I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.](https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/06/al_green_im_concerned_if_we_dont_impeach_this_president_he_will_get_re-elected.html)” - Al Green (D-TX) on May 4, 2019

> [@](#):
>
> REP. AL GREEN: I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected. **If we don’t impeach him, he will say he’s been vindicated. He will say the Democrats had an overwhelming majority in the House and didn’t take up impeachment. He will say we have a constitutional duty to do it if it was there and we didn’t. He will say he’s been vindicated**.

(Bolding mine)

Kinda feels like an intentionally misleading headline, not gonna lie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 12:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/473 "2019-05-07T12:00:58Z")

</div>

Well, it is [the Right’s stock in trade.](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-knocks-mueller-for-finding-no-conspiracy-what-if-dems-ask-china-for-trumps-tax-returns)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/474 "2019-05-07T15:06:57Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Impeachment proceedings matter, even if they don’t culminate in the removal of a President. They should be treated as serious business, and should not become just another political cudgel.

I agree with this, but I don’t think that’s the direction things are heading, unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/475 "2019-05-07T15:31:37Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> I agree with this, but I don’t think that’s the direction things are heading, unfortunately.

Trump has intensified the radicalization of the Republicans and the far right, and in doing so he has also inspired a similar radicalization among the left. This is how polarization can be used to a political group’s advantage, and in this case, I think it works to the advantage of republicans. When people point out that Trump’s approval rating is historically low, they’re missing an important point, which is that we are now living in the age of fringe politics. The days of a politician of any kind getting 60% or higher are gone for the foreseeable future because neither the far right nor the far left want a moderate. They want crusaders and warriors for their cause. A moderate would be considered compromising on virtue. We saw this on the political right wing in the years leading up to Trump, and we’re beginning to see the reaction among progressives. This is how radicalization and polarization can be a successful tactic if political candidates and parties can capitalize on it.

I say it works to the republicans advantage simply because they have a demographic majority that they can exploit. It’s easier to break the progressive left because they can be divided in different ways. They can be divided and conquered over differences on race, gender, and other forms of identity. Once conservatives become more fully aware of these vulnerabilities, I suspect that they will exploit them with behavior that we thought was a part of our past. They’ll do it because it’ll give them power, and that’s all the justification they would need in the end - in their minds anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/476 "2019-05-07T15:48:00Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> … They want crusaders and warriors for their cause. A moderate would be considered compromising on virtue. We saw this on the political right wing in the years leading up to Trump…

What do you mean? The 2012 Republican nominee was Mitt Romney, and in 2008 it was John McCain, both moderates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [May 7, 2019, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795/477 "2019-05-07T15:57:21Z")

</div>

> [@HurricaneDitka](#):
>
> What do you mean? The 2012 Republican nominee was Mitt Romney, and in 2008 it was John McCain, both moderates.

Yes, but by 2010, the tea party had become a strong political force and was no longer just a fringe. That the GOP nominated Mitt Romney in 2012 isn’t what’s important to consider; what’s important is how Mitt Romney in 2012 was quite different than Mitt Romney in 1994, and he had become more of a hardliner between 2008 and 2012. Take his position on abortion, for example, or his position on healthcare. Obamacare was really Romneycare in a different form.

By 2016, it didn’t matter how much the standard bearers of the GOP changed their positions - the conservatives were done with them. The two top candidates were Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, who was an arch conservative and had positions that were just as hard-line as Trump’s. But this was something that occurred over a period that began in the early 1990s and really got going from 2009 onward.

The position that Democrats are in now is that Biden, a moderate, is currently a favor to win not only the Democratic party’s nomination but also to beat Trump. And I suppose that could still happen, but Trump is going to continue to radicalize the Republican party because it is what he needs to do to survive: he needs to throw meat to his pet lions and wolves. But a byproduct is that this will, in turn, fuel outrage and a desire on the left to radicalize in return, which will put extreme pressure on people like Biden who want to try to remain above the fray and try to unite the different factions on the left. This will put people like Biden and Pelosi - and even Sanders - in the position of trying to fend off calls for impeachment. This might make the candidates behave in unexpected ways, and it would work to Trump’s advantage.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/impeachment-proceedings-will-they-happen/832795.md?page=23)
