# In Defence of Dualism

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-defence-of-dualism/832962>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 24, 2019, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-defence-of-dualism/832962 "2019-04-24T00:18:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2019, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-defence-of-dualism/832962/221 "2019-04-28T17:34:22Z")

</div>

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> I still say dualism, as I defined it, is non-falsifiable and thus not a solvable mystery.

And as useless as discussing how many angels can stand on the point of a pin.

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> The scientists in your earlier cite’s cites said they could not find any physical evidence of a non-physical mind. My form of dualism says there will never be any evidence.

Q.E.D.

> [@Max\_S](#):
>
> I have already admitted that my form of dualism is useless compared to physicalism. It’s not absolutely useless, but physicalism can provide everything dualism can and is falsifiable, therefore better.
> 
> I lost the debate - what are you going on about?
> 
> ~Max

Noticing that you are just asking questions when you should had let it go pages ago.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-defence-of-dualism/832962.md?page=11)