# In the long run, does the Tea Party do more to help Dems or Pubs?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 17, 2010, 7:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422 "2010-10-17T07:25:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/21 "2010-10-18T16:02:31Z")

</div>

> [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](#):
>
> Remember, the polls are conducted by phone.
> 
> _Land lines, only._

Why is that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/22 "2010-10-18T16:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@athelas](#):
>
> Here’s some [pushback](http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/opinion/18douthat.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss) on memes prevalent on the cultural left.

From the link:

> [@](#):
>
> just 5 percent of the 250 signs referenced Barack Obama’s race or religion

Join the Tea Party: Now Only 5% Overtly Racist!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/23 "2010-10-18T16:18:31Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Midnight](#):
>
> A split party does very poorly in national elections except for 1948 (Truman’s opponents were a race baiting redneck and a goofball Communist)

IIRC, Wallace was more a Communist-backed goofball.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/24 "2010-10-18T16:21:21Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> I think it will ultimately depend on how the elected tea partiers govern. Everyone is for fiscal solvency, but it’s hard to achieve those goals once you are in office without making tough choices.

I’ll bet the teabaggers’ plan will be to lie their way out of any bad outcomes because Nasty Ass Obamaaaaa ruined everything - on the assumption that it worked to get them elected, so people are really that gullible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/25 "2010-10-18T16:23:22Z")

</div>

> [@Beware\_of\_Doug](#):
>
> IIRC, Wallace was more a Communist-backed goofball.

[Who later recanted.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_A._Wallace#Later_career)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kearsen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/82dd89/32.png) [@Kearsen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kearsen)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/26 "2010-10-18T16:25:15Z")

</div>

Without getting into much nuance, my opinion on it is thus:

For some reason the Republicans have a much better track record of keeping their voters all voting a particular way. As someone said upthread, they will determine who the candidate is going to be based upon ‘can he win a general election?’  
With that said, if the Tea Party is seen by the populace as too extreme then their will be concessions made. If they fail to do this, the Democrats will welcome a split vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wevets](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e9a140/32.png) [@wevets](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wevets)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/27 "2010-10-18T16:31:27Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> I think it will ultimately depend on how the elected tea partiers govern. Everyone is for fiscal solvency, but it’s hard to achieve those goals once you are in office without making tough choices.

I’m very much in agreement with you here, **brickbacon**. For now, the Tea Party acts like a motivational organization for elements which are in the GOP already, so its impact on the 2010 elections will be like a get-out-the-vote program, except that it has also determined some of the candidates from the primaries.

After the 2010 elections, when a few of those candidates are sitting in office, what they do will determine any lasting effect of the Tea Party…

[ul]  
[li]If they vote like other GOP members, and the GOP reaches compromises with Democrats to pass significant legislation, then the Tea Party will likely have little large-scale effect.[/li][li]If they vote like other GOP members, and the GOP doesn’t compromise with Democrats, the Tea Party will have had an effect on the 2010 elections, but I don’t think it will have much lasting influence.[/li][li]If they don’t vote like other GOP members, and the GOP reaches compromises with Democrats to pass significant legislation, the Tea Party will have established an identity independent of the GOP, and might have a longer term influence than 2010.[/li][li]If they don’t vote like other GOP members, and the GOP doesn’t compromise with Democrats - no, wait, stop laughing…[/li][/ul]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 5:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/28 "2010-10-18T17:40:34Z")

</div>

> [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](#):
>
> Remember, the polls are conducted by phone.
> 
> _Land lines, only._
> 
> So they have a bias against younger voters, who tend to be cellphone-only; & towards older voters, who lean Republican, & keep the landlines.

Nate Silver of 538 says the result is about 5 percent skewed toward the Repubs. and Tea Baggers. A lot of elections are closer because of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/29 "2010-10-18T17:49:05Z")

</div>

> [@Kearsen](#):
>
> Without getting into much nuance, my opinion on it is thus:
> 
> For some reason the Republicans have a much better track record of keeping their voters all voting a particular way. As someone said upthread, they will determine who the candidate is going to be based upon ‘can he win a general election?’  
> With that said, if the Tea Party is seen by the populace as too extreme then their will be concessions made. If they fail to do this, the Democrats will welcome a split vote.

Who will make the concessions?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/30 "2010-10-18T17:49:58Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Why is that?

Who is more likely to have land lines in this day and age?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/31 "2010-10-18T17:54:25Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Who is more likely to have land lines in this day and age?

I was under the impression that BrainGlutton was asking why only land-line users were being polled … why not cell phone users as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/32 "2010-10-18T18:14:21Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> I was under the impression that BrainGlutton was asking why only land-line users were being polled … why not cell phone users as well?

Retired people that can afford it and those that have businesses are more likely to have land lines-the less affluent, not so much. This is one way to tilt the poll to leave out the unemployed and lower incomed folks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Oakminster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/77aa72/32.png) [@Oakminster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Oakminster)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/33 "2010-10-18T18:32:45Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> I was under the impression that BrainGlutton was asking why only land-line users were being polled … why not cell phone users as well?

For the love of OG, NO. A thousand times NO. I do not want or need dozens of politicians calling my cell phone. Polls, political ads, charities…all the assholes with exemptions to the no call list are most welcome to kiss my ass. I don’t want to talk to them, and I especially don’t want them calling me. My cell phone is for my convenience–to reach people I want to reach, and to allow a select few–ie, family, friends, and certain others to reach me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/34 "2010-10-18T19:41:31Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Who is more likely to have land lines in this day and age?

I mean, why do they only poll via land lines? Some technical reason?

> [@Oakminster](#):
>
> For the love of OG, NO. A thousand times NO. I do not want or need dozens of politicians calling my cell phone. Polls, political ads, charities…all the assholes with exemptions to the no call list are most welcome to kiss my ass. I don’t want to talk to them, and I especially don’t want them calling me. My cell phone is for my convenience–to reach people I want to reach, and to allow a select few–ie, family, friends, and certain others to reach me.

Definitely not for **that** reason, I should think. Polling is no biz for you if you respect people’s right to be left alone. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/35 "2010-10-18T19:49:15Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> I mean, why do they only poll via land lines? Some technical reason?

It used to be because cell phones weren’t listed in the phone books all that often. Also, cell phone location drift is a big problem nowadays-people keep their old cell phone numbers when they move across the country, skewing local poll results. Sally could still have her old Palm Springs number even though she now lives in Kalamazoo, so any opinion she has is next to useless when it comes to local or semi-local polls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/36 "2010-10-18T20:34:27Z")

</div>

I believe there’s also a law that all calls placed to cell phones (even from folks exempt from the no-call-list laws like political pollsters) must be dialed by hand, so it costs more to have the call center calling cell phones. Some pollsters just pay extra for hand-dialing and call them anyway, but most don’t bother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kearsen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/82dd89/32.png) [@Kearsen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kearsen)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/37 "2010-10-18T20:35:24Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Who will make the concessions?

The Republicans who pick the candidates of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kearsen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/82dd89/32.png) [@Kearsen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kearsen)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/38 "2010-10-18T20:36:30Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Retired people that can afford it and those that have businesses are more likely to have land lines-the less affluent, not so much. This is one way to tilt the poll to leave out the unemployed and lower incomed folks.

The less affluent are less likely to have a phone at all…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/39 "2010-10-18T20:38:07Z")

</div>

> [@Kearsen](#):
>
> The less affluent are less likely to have a phone at all…

But if they have a phone, it is very likely it’s a cheap throwaway cell phone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kearsen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/82dd89/32.png) [@Kearsen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kearsen)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2010, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422/40 "2010-10-18T20:46:23Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> But if they have a phone, it is very likely it’s a cheap throwaway cell phone.

We are making lots of assumptions already but if they were frugal with their money, a land line is typically cheaper than a cell phone, no?  
Add in the fact that there are still some rural areas that don’t provide cell phone service (don’t get me started on this one as I’m in Austin a budding metropolis and still get dropped regularly)  
I’d say land line polls are:

1. easier
2. more stable (people don’t get a new number with each throw away land line)
3. cost effective

If they did both how would they effect those who don’t want their cell number distributed like Oak? I suppose both is plausible if somewhat less effective.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-the-long-run-does-the-tea-party-do-more-to-help-dems-or-pubs/557422.md?page=3)
