# In which I pit blind, bigoted hatred....

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 11, 2004, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602 "2004-07-11T20:33:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![El\_Kabong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/el_kabong/32/496_2.png) [@El\_Kabong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Kabong)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/61 "2004-07-12T22:49:35Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> It is really pathetic to witness all that empty flag waving and US = Number 1 And We Beat The Crap Out Of Those Filthy Muslims on boards like this.

Link?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/62 "2004-07-12T22:54:22Z")

</div>

> [@TeaElle](#):
>
> The Assemblies of God takes a broad view of anointing someone with oil when they are prayed for under unique circumstances. One is when a new baby is dedicated – we do not christen or baptize children – another is when someone is sick. The last is whenever someone requests special prayer because they are entering into a time when they will be specially challenged, when they may be in danger or when the circumstances of their lives are changing in a very significant way, such as marriage or after the death of a spouse or the undertaking of a new job.

So is John Ashcroft a member of the Assemblies of God?

I found this website - is it the correct one?

> **[Assemblies of God (USA) Official Web Site | AG](https://ag.org/)**

If so, I have some questions (using information at the site)

[http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life\_QA/Healings.cfm](http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life_QA/Healings.cfm)

“I was healed by the power of God of a brain tumor — more than 30 years ago. As a pastor, when a neighbor’s eye had been pierced by a scissor point, I prayed for her over the phone and she was instantly healed.  
…  
Encourage those who need a miracle to call out to the Lord first — before consulting a physician.”

So this church believes in miracles and also recommends faith healing before medical care?

[http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life\_QA/second\_coming.cfm](http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life_QA/second_coming.cfm)

“As God’s children, our earthly lives will end in one of two ways: by death or via the Rapture…”

And believes in the Rapture?

[http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life\_QA/Religions.cfm](http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life_QA/Religions.cfm)

“The real question is: On what basis can we claim that Christianity alone brings people into right relationship with God? The answer is simple: Only the gospel provides a true antidote to the problem of sin.”

But the Rapture will only save **Christians** from Hell?

[http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life\_QA/Hell.cfm](http://pentecostalevangel.ag.org/pentecostal-evangel/Life_QA/Hell.cfm)

“If God is love, how can people go to hell who have never heard about Christ?  
…  
Hell was created for the devil and his angels. (See Matthew 25:41.) The whole process of redemption effected on the cross shows that God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (See 2 Peter 3:9.) God is also holy and cannot tolerate sin. We condemn ourselves by willfully sinning. By sending His Son to offer up His life, God has provided a way of escape from the just consequences of our sins and has called us to let people know about Jesus Christ and His atoning blood that brings reconciliation between God and man.  
If the message of salvation is not communicated to a lost world, it will not be God’s fault, but ours who are charged by Him to relay the message.”

And the only way to be saved from Hell is for Christians to tell you about the danger and convert you to their Christianity?

Does all this mean that John Ashcroft believes that all Muslims, Jews etc will go to Hell unless they are converted to Christianity?  
And that it is his sacred duty to bring salvation to the World, including the Middle East?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/63 "2004-07-12T23:10:19Z")

</div>

> [@fluiddruid](#):
>
> Well, I deal with it in the sense that I am critical of why he was given the election. I don’t understand those who say “it’s the way it is, deal with it”. Why should we just accept it because it has happened?
> 
> It does concern me that a) he did lose the popular election and b) I understand that some analysts are claiming that he should not have won Florida. The right to vote and have proper elections is incredibly important to America.

Because he wasn’t “given” the election. He won it. Every recount showed him winning, and the numbers kept getting bigger. The so-called experts are wrong.

> [@](#):
>
> Ah, yes… I recall those high days of the Clinton presidency, where conservatives around the country held hands and said “By hook or by crook, Clinton is out president and God Bless America!” What unity, what glory…
> 
> …what bullshit. No offense to reasonable conservatives, but at the very least we’re criticizing Bush on the basis of his presidency, rather than his personal life.

Except that Clinton committed a felony while in office, and that is why he was impeached. Everyone seems to overlook that one small detail.

> [@](#):
>
> Perhaps we are not saying that we disagree with him – perhaps we mean what we say and call him a liar.
> 
> Saying that there was definitive proof of an imminent threat on the US by Iraq via WMDs was, well, a lie. It may not have been Bush’s lie – Bush may not have known, though I suspect he was not sure of its whole truth – but it is a lie. This is important. We went to war on the basis of a lie.

Ah, Grasshopper - there we come to a fine point of distinction, and the basis of my post. If someone that you trust tells you something and you tell it to others and act on the basis of what you were told, and then later it is found out that what you were told was incorrect, did you lie when you told others? The answer is NO. You acted in good faith; you did not lie. Same with Bush. He acted in good faith on intelligence that said WMDs. Hell, the entire free world operated on the same intelligence for the ten years following Gulf War 1.

And there it is - he did not lie. At least, as far as I know today, and I have seen absolutely no proof that Bush knew the intel was wrong and acted on it anyway. And was it a matter of the intel being wrong or the intel being deliberately distorted for some reason? That, we don’t know. Only time will tell. It looks like we may have done the right thing for the wrong reason, and again - only time will tell.

> [@](#):
>
> I am sure that you can see how odd I feel it is do label us with such a broad brush and accuse us of bigotry and hatred – look at the vitriole in your own post. Let’s get over the childish name calling and move toward a position where we can criticize and watch the government without being maligned and where both parties can express ideas rather than soundbytes. I’m all for that.

I made the point that I lumped the entire group I was pitting under the label of liberals because the vast majority of the people doing it are liberals. I’ll retract that label - my error. Let’s bag them all as spoiled brats and let it go at that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/64 "2004-07-12T23:19:47Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> I made the point that I lumped the entire group I was pitting under the label of liberals because the vast majority of the people doing it are liberals. I’ll retract that label - my error. Let’s bag them all as spoiled brats and let it go at that.

Actually you said about liberals:

- they have blind, unreasoning, bigoted hatred of Bush
- they are asswipes who spew venom
- they throw temper tantrums like a bunch of spoiled brats
- they puke out bigotry and hatred on a daily basis

You didn’t give a single example to back any of this up.

Aren’t you therefore guilty of precisely what you ‘claimed’ liberals are guilty of?  
Aren’t you therefore a hypocrite?

P.S. Your apology sucks. You’re still an asshole.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/65 "2004-07-12T23:51:20Z")

</div>

> [@El\_Kabong](#):
>
> Link?

Aldeberan don’t need no stinkin’ links.

His post is his cite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2004, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/66 "2004-07-12T23:56:03Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> He won it. Every recount showed him winning, and the numbers kept getting bigger. The so-called experts are wrong.

Y’know, if you continue to submit falsehoods in _every_ post, we are going to get to the point where we don’t believe _anything_ you post.

There were several ways in which recounts might have been undertaken in Florida (varying the way that votes were tabulated and recounting or declining to recount various districts) and several of them would have given the Florida vote to Gore. In the interests of avoiding the sort of street riots that plague many other countries when they have elections, I would say that we went through the appropriate channels and, fair or not, we should accept the election results. It is certainly true that the election as it was counted gave Florida to Bush.

The claim that _every recount_ showed Bush winning with successively higher numbers, however, is simply a lie. Among the two or three potential recounts available to Florida, the one that the Republicans prefer to look at (for which I do not blame them) showed Bush increasing his lead over Gore, but that is not “every” recount and at least two possible recounts showed Gore decisively beating Bush. Arguments about which recounts should have been used dominated this Forum along with **GD** and **IMHO** for weeks, and it is unlikely that anyone will now change their opinions by rehashing those ancient threads. Boldly declaring a falsehood, however, does not turn it into a truth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spectrum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9fc29f/32.png) [@spectrum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spectrum)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/67 "2004-07-13T01:22:01Z")

</div>

Thanks, Tom. That’s exactly what I was going to say. Except to add that the type of recount that the Bush campaign would have considered “acceptable” (mainly because it was unfeasible in the amount of time available) was a hand-recount of the entire state. That is one of the types of recounts that would have resulted in a narrow Gore victory.

On the other hand, Gore’s overly slick and disreputable “just count the counties that voted for me most” tactic would have backfired, and resulted in a larger Bush margin.

Irony, indeed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/68 "2004-07-13T01:38:13Z")

</div>

IIRC, though, Gore initially asked for a state wide recount and was rebuffed by the Bush side. After that, Gore asked for a count in the disputed counties and was accused of cherry picking.

Bush is the one who balked at a statewide recount, not Gore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/69 "2004-07-13T01:58:28Z")

</div>

> [@glee](#):
>
> Actually you said about liberals:
> 
> - they have blind, unreasoning, bigoted hatred of Bush
> - they are asswipes who spew venom
> - they throw temper tantrums like a bunch of spoiled brats
> - they puke out bigotry and hatred on a daily basis
> 
> You didn’t give a single example to back any of this up.
> 
> Aren’t you therefore guilty of precisely what you ‘claimed’ liberals are guilty of?  
> Aren’t you therefore a hypocrite?
> 
> P.S. Your apology sucks. You’re still an asshole.

Well, first off, I didn’t apologize. I just changed the label.

I also said:

> [@](#):
>
> Now, I’m quite sure a bunch of the libs will now jump on board and post about what an asshole I am and stuff like that. Knock yourselves out. Just keep in mind that every post like that confirms the accuracy of what I have said.

Thanks for providing the confirmation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZebraShaSha](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/eada6e/32.png) [@ZebraShaSha](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZebraShaSha)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 2:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/70 "2004-07-13T02:18:43Z")

</div>

The only thing I would like to add to tonights festivities is that **Muad’Dib** has made the only point that appeals to me so far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 7:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/71 "2004-07-13T07:50:13Z")

</div>

> [@Aldebaran](#):
>
> And as for the civilians killed in Iraq: I think you just made an allusion that every single news report coming out of their, including filmed material is just madeup by the anti war and probably in your idea exclusively by the anti US crowd?

No (with some reservations) I tend to believe what I see and read in the news, at least unless I have some reason to believe otherwise. So, I believe that there were videotapes showing Osama bin Laden gloating over and claiming “credit” for the September 11 attacks; and I also believe that civilians–including children–have been killed and maimed in the American invasion of Iraq and the resulting war against the Iraqi insurgents (or the war against the foreign terrorists in Iraq, or the war against the foreign terrorists in Iraq _ **and** _ Iraqi insurgents, as the case may be).

> [@Aldebaran](#):
>
> You can of course hold on to your belief that everything an Iraqy sais about what happens to Iraqi family member, friends, neighbours is a lie because you are US citizen and in your brain that means that You Are God.  
> You can also think that Iraqis are beast who bury their children alive.  
> I do not think so, but I do hope you are happy with whatever you like to think and believe.
> 
> Salaam. A

You can of course hold on to your belief that everything an American says about the deaths of several thousands of people on September 11, 2001–Americans and also our guests from around the world–is a lie because you are an Arab and a Muslim and in your brain that means we are the Great Satan.

You can also think that Americans are beasts who murder our own countrymen in order to blame it on foreigners, invade their countries, and steal their oil. (Or is it the Israelis who are the monsters and attack their own best allies and murder thousands of innocent people, and we Americans are merely dupes of the cunning Zionist plotters?)

I do not think so, but I don’t suppose that will sway your opinions any.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 10:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/72 "2004-07-13T10:26:40Z")

</div>

> [@MEBuckner](#):
>
> Oh, knock it off. “Historians” aren’t the Grand Exalted High Priests of the Revealed Truth.

I agree with you. But haven’t you appealed to historians before to help validate your points? [For example:](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=2173165&postcount=14) “Another interesting point about fascist economics: Most historians agree that Nazi Germany actually did a worse job of mobilizing and coordinating its economy for total war than did the Western Allies (notably the USA under Franklin Roosevelt).”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 10:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/73 "2004-07-13T10:42:10Z")

</div>

Oddly enough, there is a middle ground between “Historians are the Grand Exalted High Priests of the Revealed Truth” and “Everything historians say is a lie”.

Note that I’m not saying in this thread that I reject some viewpoint _because_ it’s espoused by historians; I just refuse to reject a claim because historians haven’t yet pronounced judgement on it.

When Hitler invaded Poland in 1939, he claimed that Poland had actually attacked Germany. Should everyone have waited a few decades to let the professional historians pass judgement on this claim before they acted?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b5a626/32.png) [@glee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glee)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 10:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/74 "2004-07-13T10:47:57Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> Well, first off, I didn’t apologize. I just changed the label.

Ah yes, from one unsupported insult to another. I apologise for thinking you had some decency.

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> I also said:
> 
> “Now, I’m quite sure a bunch of the libs will now jump on board and post about what an asshole I am and stuff like that. Knock yourselves out. Just keep in mind that every post like that confirms the accuracy of what I have said.”
> 
> Thanks for providing the confirmation.

The proof you are a hypocrite and an asshole is your first post in this thread, in which you claim a bunch of people have made appalling accusations without any proof.  
Your very post villifies these people without any proof.  
Can you see the logic yet?

If you need more, here we go:

**Clothahump is a vicious lying insulting paedophile hypocrite who was responsible for 9/11.**  
Now, I’m quite sure he will now jump on board and post about what an asshole I am and stuff like that. Knock yourself out. Just keep in mind that every post like that confirms the accuracy of what I have said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 10:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/75 "2004-07-13T10:48:23Z")

</div>

> [@MEBuckner](#):
>
> Oddly enough, there is a middle ground between “Historians are the Grand Exalted High Priests of the Revealed Truth” and “Everything historians say is a lie”.

Oh, sure, no one would disagree. But was Aldebaran claiming that “Historians are the Grand Exalted High Priests of the Revealed Truth”? Wasn’t your remark really just a red herring? I’m not knocking you for a logical fallacy or anything. I mean, this is the Pit and all, not Great Debates. I’m willing to give you that it was merely a rhetorical vice. But as such, was your response to him really any more compelling than “You have poopie on your head.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2004, 11:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602/76 "2004-07-13T11:04:02Z")

</div>

What Aldebaran said was that “there is no solid proof whatsoever who was really involved in these attacks”–apparently because no historian has published an “in depth study about these events”; but perhaps in a “few decades” we’ll know something about this event–“or maybe not”.

I’m not quite sure what we’re all supposed to do in the meantime. I guess at this rate we should all be about ready to give those Germans a good talking to about staging the attack on the Gleiwitz radio station.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/in-which-i-pit-blind-bigoted-hatred/254602.md?page=3)
