# Inblourious Gasterds Mafia

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [September 8, 2009, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280 "2009-09-08T14:18:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peekercpa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8baadc/32.png) [@peekercpa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/peekercpa)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 10:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/181 "2009-09-11T10:57:57Z")

</div>

here is the sequal, coded correctly.

**vote texcat**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peekercpa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8baadc/32.png) [@peekercpa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/peekercpa)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/182 "2009-09-11T11:07:36Z")

</div>

ok, in all seriousness.

the random placement of non votes is real bad. so while, my default is to ride lurkers like spelvin here it will be getting on non voters.

so any strategy that gets a vote out is better than nothing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ColdPhoenix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6bbea6/32.png) [@ColdPhoenix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ColdPhoenix)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/183 "2009-09-11T11:21:07Z")

</div>

To be fair **Texcat** probably got the newts comment from post 144 and has never seen the movie so it’s not really inconsistent.

**Texcat** , in all seriousness though, you should watch this movie:

> **[Monty Python and the Holy Grail](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python_and_the_Holy_Grail)**
>
> Monty Python and the Holy Grail is a 1975 British comedy film satirizing the Arthurian legend, written and performed by the Monty Python comedy group (Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin) and directed by Gilliam and Jones in their feature directorial debuts. It was conceived during the hiatus between the third and fourth series of their BBC Television series Monty Python's Flying Circus.
> While the group's first film, And Now for Something Comp...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ColdPhoenix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6bbea6/32.png) [@ColdPhoenix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ColdPhoenix)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/184 "2009-09-11T11:24:55Z")

</div>

I meant post #141.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hoopy\_Frood](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hoopy_frood/32/8452_2.png) [@Hoopy\_Frood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hoopy_Frood)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/185 "2009-09-11T11:28:13Z")

</div>

> [@AllWalker](#):
>
> …in order to get on he mods’ good side

Best. Voting. Reason. Ever.

The Gasterds have happily accepted your gratuitous sucking up. We are not above bribery or flattery, after all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hoopy\_Frood](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hoopy_frood/32/8452_2.png) [@Hoopy\_Frood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hoopy_Frood)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/186 "2009-09-11T11:32:43Z")

</div>

Updated vote count:

Current Votes:

**DiggitCamara (5)**: Zeriel, AllWalker, Freudian Slit, BillMC, ColdPhoenix  
**texcat (1)**: peekercpa  
**Normal Phase (1)**: TexCat

**Not voting** : Tom Scud, Zsofia, Normal Phase, Mahaloth, DiggitCamara, DarthSensitive, Nanook of the North Shore, Gryff

As of now **DiggitCamara** will be lynched at dusk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 11:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/187 "2009-09-11T11:57:49Z")

</div>

Diggit, are you banned from responding or explaining yourself or something?

**Vote DigitCamera**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Normal\_Phase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Normal\_Phase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Normal_Phase)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 12:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/188 "2009-09-11T12:30:35Z")

</div>

This has to be the strangest bandwagon I’ve ever not (yet) hopped on. Somebody explain it to me while I get myself some coffee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeriel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/58956e/32.png) [@Zeriel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeriel)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 12:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/189 "2009-09-11T12:47:34Z")

</div>

Hey, I just voted him to get him to explain why “peeker being incomprehensible like usual” is OBVIOUSLY "peeker has a posting restriction. Didn’t know it’d start a trend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TexCat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/texcat/32/9041_2.png) [@TexCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TexCat)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/190 "2009-09-11T12:58:17Z")

</div>

> [@ColdPhoenix](#):
>
> To be fair **Texcat** probably got the newts comment from post 144 and has never seen the movie so it’s not really inconsistent.
> 
> **Texcat** , in all seriousness though, you should watch this movie:  
> [Monty Python and the Holy Grail - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python_and_the_Holy_Grail)

You are correct, I did get the newts comment from Normal’s post. And I have seen the movie, although it has been quite a while since I last saw it. That wooden rabbit to the head may have knocked a little sense (or should that be nonsense?) into me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Scud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f08c70/32.png) [@Tom\_Scud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Scud)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/191 "2009-09-11T13:01:49Z")

</div>

> [@Hoopy\_Frood](#):
>
> 1. **ALL KILL SUBMISSIONS ARE MANDATORY**. This includes Scum nightkill, Vigilante kills, Serial Killer kills, and the lynch. There is no “No Lynch”. A vote for that is completely ignored. If no one votes, [random.org](http://random.org) will decide who dies.

> [@peekercpa](#):
>
> ok, in all seriousness.
> 
> the random placement of non votes is real bad. so while, my default is to ride lurkers like spelvin here it will be getting on non voters.

Peeker, I think you misread the rules. [Random.org](http://Random.org) only comes into it if no one at all votes; there wasn’t anything about randomly assigning nonvotes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Scud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f08c70/32.png) [@Tom\_Scud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Scud)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/192 "2009-09-11T13:04:52Z")

</div>

Also, has Diggit actually played with peeker before? I’ve lurked a couple games with him, so I kinda knew what to expect in terms of semi-comprehensibility, but I could see how someone would be confused.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Scud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f08c70/32.png) [@Tom\_Scud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Scud)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/193 "2009-09-11T13:08:59Z")

</div>

Though actually, aside from being all-lowercase, he’s been pretty straightforward & clear.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/194 "2009-09-11T13:12:31Z")

</div>

> [@Mahaloth](#):
>
> Diggit, are you banned from responding or explaining yourself or something?
> 
> **Vote DigitCamera**

Dude, what? I last checked in before I left work last night at 9, and before I get back again at 9AM there’s a bandwagon and you’re surprised that he hasn’t been checking in at 3 AM?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/195 "2009-09-11T13:13:31Z")

</div>

Oh, wait, sorry - I didn’t see he had been here and posted and not really explained himself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![peekercpa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8baadc/32.png) [@peekercpa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/peekercpa)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/196 "2009-09-11T13:15:23Z")

</div>

> [@Tom\_Scud](#):
>
> Peeker, I think you misread the rules. [Random.org](http://Random.org) only comes into it if no one at all votes; there wasn’t anything about randomly assigning nonvotes.

ok. i was parsing it like the no kill submission rule.

regardless, lurking in a game of this size and timeline is still bad and not voting is worse, my two cents of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AllWalker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/db5fbb/32.png) [@AllWalker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AllWalker)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/197 "2009-09-11T13:27:26Z")

</div>

> [@Hoopy\_Frood](#):
>
> Best. Voting. Reason. Ever.
> 
> The Gasterds have happily accepted your gratuitous sucking up. We are not above bribery or flattery, after all.

I’ll even act as a snitch and tell you who is planning what and who I think the bad guys are.

Wait, how does this game work again?

Even though I voted in jest, it looks like that is where I want my vote to be, for now. The “obvious” post restriction is slightly weird, and early Day 1 that is good enough. Throw in the lack of explanation despite prompting, well, it is easy to see why there is a bandwagon forming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AllWalker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/db5fbb/32.png) [@AllWalker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AllWalker)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/198 "2009-09-11T13:32:24Z")

</div>

NETA: and I agree with **peeker**. Short Days with unknown Gasterd element means lurking is really bad. Also, is this a fair suggestion - if anyone experiences a post restriction and can’t tell us what it is (that is a possibility, isn’t it?), could you please post lots, even fluff, to give us an idea of the restriction. Unless of course the restriction is don’t post lots, in which case listen to the mods before listening to me :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Normal\_Phase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Normal\_Phase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Normal_Phase)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/199 "2009-09-11T13:47:22Z")

</div>

I can only guess that **DiggitCamara** is referring to **peeker** ’s lack of capitals, but I fail to see why that would be perceived as a posting restriction rather than a personal style. (I’m following the Conspiracy game on IdleMafia, so I’ve seen peeker’s posts before, admittedly, whereas I don’t know if **Diggit** has, but still …) But by the same token, I don’t see why that would be worth voting him for; his response about “how would peeker write ‘I wish I’” seems clear enough to me now that I’m properly caffeinated.

I’d really like another option, but no one has done anything that strikes me as remotely scummy.

A near-unanimous bandwagon on Day One is arguably worse for Town than not lynching at all. (Not that I’m suggesting that’s remotely an option, oh great glorious mods.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Scud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f08c70/32.png) [@Tom\_Scud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Scud)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2009, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280/200 "2009-09-11T13:47:40Z")

</div>

All right, this is kind of metagamey, but I guess I should get a vote down. It seems like the first day 1 bandwagon target is almost NEVER the real scum, and I don’t want to vote for someone for being confused by **peeker** (even though I don’t think the quoted peeker post that led **Diggit** to conclude he was post-restricted was at all confusing… dude, it’s a GHOSTBUSTERS reference), so I guess I’ll point at one of the bandwagon-jumpers. **FS** has done a better job of explaining, so I guess I’ll go for **BillMC** (with FOS on **ColdP** for now).

**Vote BillMC**

Disclaimer: It’s day 1, there’s no such thing as a solid day 1 vote, etc etc.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280.md?page=9)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/inblourious-gasterds-mafia/509280.md?page=11)
