Rand Rover isn’t going to admit to any irony in these statements.
Why did you become a tax lawyer when you knew you’d end up in Hell?
Ridiculous, and obviously so. If Twickster didn’t want to work without a kill fee then she didn’t have to.
Nope. Neither of these are business situations really, so there’s no parallel.
What Twickster is saying is like Starbucks starting a pit thread complaining about how no one likes their new juice drinks and it’s so unfair and consumers are being mean.
Right. She could not work at all and sign up for welfare payments.
Speaking of which, why does anybody choose to bicker with Rand Rover? He’s not making an argument. He’s making up a position so he can disagree with someone he wants to disagree with. You won’t get anywhere with a counterargument because there’s no argument. It’s the same in every thread.
twickster, I’m sorry the motherfucker is dicking you around and I hope the pieces run on schedule.
So, you’re saying he’s a troll? Don’t trolls get banned?
Whoa. Yeah, it’s exactly like that. :smack:
Correct.
Pish posh. If you’re a true Randian, you simply negotiate until the Holy Contract is a perfect reflection of your values and ideals. In the unlikely event that you are unable to secure such a contract from a given employer, you simply square your jaw and stride confidently onward to the next opportunity, secure in the knowledge that your superior skills and abilities will prevail and allow you to dictate your work terms to the world. Only weaklings enter into suboptimal contracts.
Wow, we have a mind reader. Quick, which ignorant idiotic mod am I thinking about right now?
Here’s your answer then,** twickster**! Stick to your principles and hold out for that kill fee you won’t get, even when your principles won’t pay the rent!
Trick question. Everyone except Rand Rover is an ignorant idiot.
Yes. What you write is literally true. But nobody wants to work without a kill fee. You very rarely have literally “no choice” in the matter, but pragmatism and getting the check will often trump what you feel you’re worth and deserve. Sometimes it’s worth it to stick to your guns, sometimes you gotta compromise.
Look, I understand where you’re coming from. You’re saying, suck it up, you knew it was a possibility, so don’t complain when that possibility becomes a reality, right? But sometimes folks just want to blow off a little steam.
Oh, your principles will pay the rent. If they don’t, you either negotiated a bad contract with your landlord or you aren’t squaring your jaw firmly enough. Try striding around with your hands on your hips, sometimes that helps.
You think that’s what I’m recommending?
Look, I think your response isemblematic of many people’s focus on what is and disregard for what could be. They see poor little Twickster without a kill fee and ignore the fact that Twickster simply made a business deal that didn’t include a kill fee. She is not forced to work without a kill fee–she could find a patch of pavement and lay there until she died if that’s what she wants to do. Instead, she chose to work without a kill fee and now wants to hitch about it.
Yes, exactly. That’s the whole point of this thread. What exactly is your objection to that, other than it’s another thing about humans that you don’t understand?
My objection is that if you make a business deal with several possible outcomes, you have no reason to hitch when one of those possible outcomes occurs. There’s no crying in baseball.
[QUOTE=Rand Rover]
There’s no crying in baseball.
[/QUOTE]
But plenty of cussing and spitting if things don’t go your way.
Weren’t you the same Rand Rover who spent several pages bitching about your firm reqiring you to do pro bono work? No none forced you to work for a firm that reqired that, y’know. There’s no crying in tax law. :rolleyes: