Inconvenient packaging (I'm looking at you, Domino Sugar)

I would pay good money to see you in a zip-up sleeping bag. :stuck_out_tongue:

I detest those blister packs as well. I tend to use a matte knife, veerrry slowly- or I cut with scissors just inside the seal line but all the way around three sides. Otherwise yeah, one can be injured.

I saw an ad on TV the other day for a device that is specifically designed to open those things. Bet they will sell a million of them.

It’s like the ten hot dogs/eight buns conundrum. You’re supposed to buy five of the plastic containers and four bags of sugar.

…As opposed as toward one’s crotch. :smiley:

That said, I agree – that’s the only reason I have a 4" lockback knife around – to SYSTEMATICALLY EVISCERATE, BUTTERFLY, AND DISMEMBER those ungodly packages.

And it has turnips in it.

Preach it.

Anybody else notice that a quart of Best Foods (Hellman’s east of the Rockies) mayonnaise is thirty ounces these days?

(Emphasis added)

The Kit-Kat candy bar has the words “Kit-Kat” imprinted in it. That robs you of chocolate! That’s a clever chocolate-saving technique. I’m gonna go to the factory and tell them, “You owe me some letters!” [/Mitch Hedburg]

I live east of the Rockies. I have two jars of Hellman’s Mayonnaise in the fridge.

Do I live too far east???

Yeah, that’s what they all say.

:smiley:

I dunno; razor blades, hawksbill knives; some of us just can’t handle sharp stuff without blood loss, you know? “Great - I got the package open; now, if they can just re-attach my finger…”
Maybe I’ll just get my husband to open them. He doesn’t seem to hurt himself nearly as much.

Packaging should not need explosives to open, nor a certain skill with sharp objects. No matter what I use to open clamshell plastic packages, I usually end up cutting myself…on the plastic!

I think he means that it’s Hellman’s east of the Rockies, and Best Foods west of the Rockies.

Well, that’s the beauty of the hawkbill, used properly (cut with the blade facing away from you), it’s actually safer than a conventional drop-point/spear-point/clip-point/leaf/wharncliffe blade style, as the point is facing away from the user, and the curve of the blade keeps the point away from the device in the package

the only safer knife design is the blunt-tipped “Sheepsfoot” blade, but the lack of a point makes it more difficult to open packaging needing a “piercing” maneuver to initiate the cut

it’s also a lot safer than stabbing with scissors, which are basically two knives joined by a pivot anyway…

My husband just started a new job this week for a company that designs packaging, mostly plastics. The first thing I told him when I found out what the company did was to find out what the deal is with that clamshell packaging. If he finds out why they do it that way, and how to open it, I will let you all know.

Let us know who came up with that clamshell idea, too. We want to…discusss…it with them. Or at least I do.

At least you know it’s sugar, not pasta sauce.

Oh, yeah, I want in on that…discussion too.

How about packing the inventor of these plastic clamshells in his own product, with a limited supply of air - he needs to get out or have someone cut him out before his air’s gone?

Fella bilong missus flodnak likes Nesquik (a particular brand of chocolate milk mix). We have a 700g container. Every store I’ve looked in sells the 700g containers of Nesquik, and most sell only that size. So we can assume that 700g is their standard size, right?

So why do the “convenient refill packages!” only come in 500g or 1000g sizes? :dubious:

(Personally, I prefer O’Boy. Tastes better and the refills actually match the size of the reusable container. But the fella likes his Nesquik. Separate but equal chocolate milk mixes are a small price to pay for family harmony.)

I suppose it’s as hard to find a coupla bottles of Fox’s U-Bet syrup in Norway as it is to find a jar of Marmite in the local deli here.

I’m surprised they didn’t just go metric. That worked when 2 quart bottles of soda went to 2 liter. Which amounted to a hidden 8% shrinkage.