# Indo-European suffix "-ter / -ther"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 12, 2008, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353 "2008-11-12T15:28:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mississippienne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d2c977/32.png) [@Mississippienne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mississippienne)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/21 "2008-11-13T15:35:18Z")

</div>

I don’t know about the Hungarian-Turkish connection; someone more versed in their language histories would have to weigh in on that. I think it’s worth mentioning that some linguists group Uralic (Hungarian) and Altaic (Turkish) into one large family called Uralic-Altaic.

> [@pulykamell](#):
>
> Most of those look very similar to words in current-day Slavic languages. Interesting to see.

Here’s the modern-day transliterated equivalents:

RUSSIAN  
_Brat_, “brother”  
_Doch_, “daughter”  
_Ded_, “grandfather”  
_Mat_, “mother”  
_Dyadya_, “uncle”  
_Muzh_, “husband”  
_Otets_, “father”  
_Sestra_, “sister”  
_Zhena_, “wife”

BULGARIAN  
_Brat_, “brother”  
_Dshteria_, “daughter”  
_Dedo_, “grandfather”  
_Maika_, “mother”  
_Chicho_, “uncle”  
_Saprug_, “husband”  
_Bashta_, “father”  
_Sestra_, “sister”  
_Sapruga_, “wife”

SERBIAN  
_Brat_, “brother”  
_ćerka_, “daughter”  
_Deda_, “grandfather”  
_Mati_, “mother”  
_Ujak_, “uncle”  
_Otac_, “father”  
_Sestra_, “sister”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/22 "2008-11-13T15:59:07Z")

</div>

> [@Panurge](#):
>
> Point is: Apparently the agent suffix is different from the kinship suffix in some way

Right, not just in Sanskrit but in Indo-European in general. But the source I mentioned earlier, and other sources I’ve looked at, seem to indicate that nobody is really sure whether the agent suffix and the kinship suffix really **are** related, or if not, why they’re so similar.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/23 "2008-11-13T17:02:02Z")

</div>

> [@Panurge](#):
>
> According to MacDonell’s _A Vedic Grammar for Students_…

Just to point out that although this is a good reference and MacDonell is in general reliable, he wrote a long time ago and there have been many breakthroughs in I-E Studies that he could not have known about. Doesn’t mean he’s wrong, just not the horse’s mouth for IE stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/24 "2008-11-13T17:07:21Z")

</div>

I’d just like to say that I’m a fan of PIE/ancient language origins and really love these kinds of threads. I.e., I want more!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hibernicus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hibernicus/32/2802_2.png) [@hibernicus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hibernicus)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/25 "2008-11-13T20:59:13Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Cite for the Irish provinces? The suffix has to be _-ster_ because the Irish is _Laigin_, _Mumain_ (dat.), and _Ulaid_, by Middle Irish pronounced _lan_, _mun_ and _ul_, each of them palatalized. I had always heard that the termination was a Norse word.

No cite - just an observation. -ster makes more sense, and does indeed look Norse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Panurge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/fbc32d/32.png) [@Panurge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Panurge)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2008, 10:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353/26 "2008-11-13T22:07:37Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Just to point out that although this is a good reference and MacDonell is in general reliable, he wrote a long time ago and there have been many breakthroughs in I-E Studies that he could not have known about. Doesn’t mean he’s wrong, just not the horse’s mouth for IE stuff.

I know. But it was the only related book available to me at the time - these questions always seem to turn up when you’re out of office, don’t they? 🙂

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/indo-european-suffix-ter-ther/472353.md?page=1)
