You focused upon murder, which is the present situation. The lack of balance in measuring inherent human value is the permissiveness and availability of suicide that is as tension free as possible. For example… how do you run a prison, a sweat-shop, or a plantation or a concentration camp with easy access to suicide developed in all manners that address any possible hesitation were a person to contemplate it? The goal is to reduce possible illusory values to inherent value.
In this instance, if you can actually operate a sweat-shop with this type of environment, then the promise of free market is actualized, you are inherently doing something that is purposeful towards the species… as everyone is consenting to your take on social stratification and accepting it … in a species-wide sense. It plows right through the rhetoric and zeroes in on what is consistent with the proclomations of value and purpose.
We have all sorts of technology to accomplish murder and social stratification without the slightest bit of ‘feeling’ or tension… we’ve literally cut off an entire sensory organ with respect to isolating that which threatens our purposes for acting consistently, our ability to observe what allows us to survive, our ability to tell the difference between whether death is natural or whether we are delusionally killing ourselves by self-fulfilling prophesy (only to call it survival). To balance these tables of consent, looking back upon an almost single minded historical devotion to murder technology that provides little tension, we require the same type of technology devoted to suicide in order to measure whether our purposes are inherent.
This does several things… a.) If someone leaves on your watch, you are not translating inherent purpose for life – and that will KILL YOU! b.) It gets around the homicide problem for having children in the first place, as it calculates for the consent of the being … it still leaves room to justify continuing life. c.) All actions are geared towards the observation of inherency, translating that inherency in order to survive, placing pressure on adapting in manners that allow one to survive with consent… to intend whether they die, how they die and under what circumstances and/or conditions.
It’s my intuition (I’ll certainly argue it) that social stratification is de-selected when suicide is more readily available. The idea that there will be “warlords” everywhere is impossible. You cannot be a “warlord” when inherent value is being measured, when COERSION is being selected out of the popoulation in favor of accountability to what is actual with respect to intents and effects taken under the auspices of those beliefs and intents.