Interchangeable carbon blobs. Only 1% generate any wealth.

[emacknight]

@Try2B_Comprehensive

Instead of ‘interchangeable’, how about ‘replaceable’? It’s more machiney, conjuring the notion of replaceable parts and industrialization. Ok, now consider the victory of the Japanese car companies a few decades ago. Their cars needed less ‘replacing’ because they were more durable and apparently better designed. Less maintenance made them a more valuable asset.

So what you’re saying is that Japanese cars weren’t interchangeable with the crappy American versions? That perhaps some cars are more valuable than others?