# interdum or nonnumquam?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 10, 2007, 6:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185 "2007-10-10T06:46:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackdavinci](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackdavinci/32/3259_2.png) [@jackdavinci](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackdavinci)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2007, 6:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/1 "2007-10-10T06:46:58Z")

</div>

Not homework - writing a story and need to translate “A, E, I, O, U, and sometimes Y” into Latin. I realize Y isn’t used as a vowel in Latin - the story is a modern one and it’s just being used as a motto. Perusing an online latin dictionary it seems to offer me two choices:

interdum : sometimes, now and then, at times.  
nonnumquam : sometimes.

Not being a Latin scholar, I’m not sure what phrase would be better in this context, “et interdum” or “et nonnumquam”. Or maybe a more literal translation of “some… times”? Any ideas?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cunctator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/43a26b/32.png) [@Cunctator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cunctator)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2007, 7:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/2 "2007-10-10T07:09:15Z")

</div>

I’d go for interdum. It seems less clumsy than nonnumquam (which is literally ‘not never’).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2007, 8:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/3 "2007-10-10T08:29:34Z")

</div>

Of the two, I’d go for _non nunquam_ - _interdum_ has the feel of time whereas _non nunquam_ doesn’t.

But have you considered _non nolo_? This is a motto, after all.

A, E, I, O, U semper; Y non nolo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackdavinci](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackdavinci/32/3259_2.png) [@jackdavinci](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackdavinci)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2007, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/4 "2007-10-10T17:44:50Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Quartz]  
Of the two, I’d go for _non nunquam_ - _interdum_ has the feel of time whereas _non nunquam_ doesn’t.  
[/QUOTE]

Can you explain that a little more?

hmm.. the online dictionary lists it as one word, “nonnumquam” - is it more proper as one word or two?

[QUOTE=Quartz]  
But have you considered _non nolo_? This is a motto, after all. A, E, I, O, U semper; Y non nolo.  
[/QUOTE]

I wanted to have an “et” expression so I could use the ampersand symbol.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2007, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/5 "2007-10-10T22:06:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=jackdavinci]  
Can you explain that a little more?  
[/quote]

Non nunquam is ‘not never’ i.e. sometimes, whereas interdum is more ‘from time to time’ but between time A and time B.

Consider the difference betwen non numquam requiescat - he rested sometime - and interdum requiescat - he rested from time to time.

Of course, it’s over 20 years since I studied Latin seriously, so I may be talking complete bollocks.

> [@](#):
>
> hmm.. the online dictionary lists it as one word, “nonnumquam” - is it more proper as one word or two?

I don’t know. But the Romans liked their double negatives.

> [@](#):
>
> I wanted to have an “et” expression so I could use the ampersand symbol.

That would often be -que at the end of a word. Mottos are short.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DaphneBlack](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/daphneblack/32/5389_2.png) [@DaphneBlack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DaphneBlack)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2007, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/6 "2007-10-11T00:54:22Z")

</div>

I would use ‘aliquando’.

[aliquando bonus Homerus dormitat = sometimes even the good Homer nods]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CJJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecc23a/32.png) [@CJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CJJ)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2007, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/7 "2007-10-11T14:25:01Z")

</div>

_Aliquando_ is probably better than _interdum_, though both are acceptable. _Aliquando_ shows up more frequently in contrasts with words like _semper_ and _numquam_, and I suppose the point of the quote is that the first five are always vowels, while the last is only a vowel sometimes. I’m reminded of a quote from Tacitus’ _Agricola_: _Haud semper errat fama; aliquando et elegit_ - “Public opinion (_fama_)doesn’t always err, sometimes even it chooses correctly.”

_A, E, I, O, U, et aliquando Y_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2007, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interdum-or-nonnumquam/422185/8 "2007-10-11T18:00:15Z")

</div>

Very nice!
