# Interesting phrase origin of Bible verse "For now we see through a glass, darkly"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [March 4, 2017, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406 "2017-03-04T18:14:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2017, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/1 "2017-03-04T18:14:55Z")

</div>

Interesting phrase origin of Bible verse below. “1 Corinthians 13:12 (KJV) - For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known”. - Not as metaphorical as you might imagine, apparently ancient mirrors were inherently dark [per mirror wiki.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror)

"Stone mirrors often had poor reflectivity compared to metals, yet metals scratch or tarnish easily, so they frequently needed polishing. Depending upon the color, both often yielded reflections with poor color rendering.[6] The poor image quality of ancient mirrors explains 1 Corinthians 13’s reference to seeing “as in a mirror, darkly”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mixdenny](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mixdenny/32/2962_2.png) [@mixdenny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mixdenny)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2017, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/2 "2017-03-04T20:59:40Z")

</div>

That has to be one of the most confusing Bible quotes ever. I don’t understand anything after darkly. But is does say, "though a glass " as opposed to “in a glass”.

dennis

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_King\_of\_Soup](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a87d85/32.png) [@The\_King\_of\_Soup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_King_of_Soup)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2017, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/3 "2017-03-04T21:17:54Z")

</div>

Speaking as a non-believer, it’s one of my favorite chapters. 1 Corinthians 13:12 reminds us that we cannot see each other perfectly, and it does so in the context of reminding us that the greatest by far of all God’s commands is to love each other. It provides us a reason to behave charitably even when our senses tell us we have an excuse not to. In fact, the King James translation doesn’t even use the word “love,” substituting “charity,” but I prefer “love” just for poetic and sentimental reasons.

ETA: and “through” is just the metaphor the author chose: after all, what we see in a mirror is neither on nor in it, so we’re not (exactly) merely looking in or at it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 3:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/4 "2017-03-05T03:47:10Z")

</div>

> [@The\_King\_of\_Soup](#):
>
> ETA: and “through” is just the metaphor the author chose: after all, what we see in a mirror is neither on nor in it, so we’re not (exactly) merely looking in or at it.

Meaning what the \*translator \*chose, of course. [Different translations use different turns of phrase](http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/13-12.htm) but it does seem the notion in the original is understood as a mirror/looking-glass.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Chimera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chimera)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 3:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/5 "2017-03-05T03:52:21Z")

</div>

_Oh  
I’m caught up in the middle  
But I’ll take it to the end  
It’s coming back together  
And it’s breaking down again  
If I could find a reason  
I’d say you were my friend  
If I could find a reason  
I’d say it once again  
When I’m with you  
The days are bittersweet  
I still can’t remember  
What it feels to be complete  
Yeah  
I’ve tried pretending  
But it drops off my feet  
I don’t know what it’s coming to  
But I’m looking through the glass darkly  
Yeah_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 11:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/6 "2017-03-05T11:02:13Z")

</div>

I was also taught that it’s an echo, expressed in terms contemporary to the translators, of Plato’s idea of the shadows in the cave:  
[https://philosophyzer.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/the-allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato-summary-and-meaning/](https://philosophyzer.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/the-allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato-summary-and-meaning/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/try2b_comprehensive/32/65_2.png) [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Try2B_Comprehensive)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/7 "2017-03-05T18:01:04Z")

</div>

Very interesting if this section is a nod to Plato’s world of forms- I’ve often wondered how many Bible sentiments basically revise and revive older sources.  
Philip K. Dick borrowed the image for [A Scanner Darkly](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Scanner_Darkly).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/8 "2017-03-05T19:40:22Z")

</div>

I always have understood this passage to mean:

In this lifetime on earth, I can only understand God as a kind of reflection of, or in terms of, myself (as if in a mirror, indistinctly), but in heaven I will truly see God as God is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ftg](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ftg/32/2801_2.png) [@ftg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ftg)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/9 "2017-03-05T21:37:06Z")

</div>

Good to know that it is probably referring to a mirror. Seeing thru a glass darkly has a [scrying](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrying) overtone to it. While the Mormons believe the Urim and Thummim were for scrying, that isn’t the most common belief. No glass-like object appears to be referenced in the Bible in this way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Corry\_El](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecae2f/32.png) [@Corry\_El](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Corry_El)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2017, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/10 "2017-03-05T22:45:10Z")

</div>

> [@astro](#):
>
> Interesting phrase origin of Bible verse below. "1 Corinthians 13:12 (KJV) - For now we see through a glass, darkly;
> 
> "Stone mirrors often had poor reflectivity compared to metals, yet metals scratch or tarnish easily, so they frequently needed polishing. Depending upon the color, both often yielded reflections with poor color rendering.[6] The poor image quality of ancient mirrors explains 1 Corinthians 13’s reference to seeing “as in a mirror, darkly”

As given in links the English translations vary slightly as for almost every other passage. The Greek words in the original are ‘esoptru’ generally translated ‘mirror’ or ‘looking glass’ but meaning mirror, and ‘ainigmati’, dim obscure, not necessarily the exact connotation of the modern English ‘enigmatic’ though it’s obviously related.

To take a couple of examples in totally unrelated languages it’s 鏡子 and 模糊 in the Chinese Catholic Bible, being the common word for ‘mirror’ and ‘blurry’ or ‘indistinct’, ‘obscure’. In the Korean Catholic Bible it’s 거울 and 어렴풋이 , again the most common word for ‘mirror’ and an indigenous Korean word that’s approximately synonymous with 模糊, which is also a Sino-Korean word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 7:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/11 "2017-03-06T07:00:03Z")

</div>

The modern versions I find in Spanish generally use _espejo_, “mirror” and _amor_, “love”. Charity is a type of love; using the more general word includes the other types of love as well. Older versions tended to choose _caridad_, the specific type.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/12 "2017-03-06T13:42:54Z")

</div>

I always was told the meaning is as explained - ancient mirrors weren’t very good, and “glass” meant “looking glass”. But I grew up on the RSV rather than the King James Version.

Perhaps a better translation would be “now we see an imperfect reflection, but then we shall see face to face”.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kobal2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kobal2/32/20_2.png) [@Kobal2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kobal2)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/13 "2017-03-06T13:58:57Z")

</div>

> [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](#):
>
> Very interesting if this section is a nod to Plato’s world of forms- I’ve often wondered how many Bible sentiments basically revise and revive older sources.

You mean to say early Christianism not so much was inspired by the theo-cultural landscape of its day as mugged it in a dark alley and rifled through its pockets for any loose metaphors, half-eaten symbolism or barely used rite ? Get out of here !

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/14 "2017-03-06T14:00:14Z")

</div>

> [@Kobal2](#):
>
> You mean to say early Christianism not so much was inspired by the theo-cultural landscape of its day as mugged it in a dark alley to rifle through its pockets for any loose metaphors, half-eaten symbolism or barely used rite ? Get out of here !

Wait, wait, when are we supposed to have stopped doing it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/try2b_comprehensive/32/65_2.png) [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Try2B_Comprehensive)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/15 "2017-03-06T15:09:10Z")

</div>

Bit of an excluded middle there… It’d be a good question to confirm something like this. Is there a straight line between, for example, any of Plato’s ideas and the Bible? If this Bible verse has a pedigree that traces back, what does that trail look like? At what point are we certain?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2017, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/16 "2017-03-06T16:32:43Z")

</div>

If we are talking about Neo-Platonism, that didn’t arise until long after the works of the New Testament were finished. There appears to be much more Stoic philosophy in the letters of Paul than Platonism.

It seems a bit of a stretch to say “Paul mentioned a mirror, therefore he stole the idea from Plato”.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/try2b_comprehensive/32/65_2.png) [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Try2B_Comprehensive)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/17 "2017-03-07T05:46:23Z")

</div>

As a sort of “last laugh” for Plato, what if Paul never heard of Plato or any of his ideas, but since Plato was correct that we can sort of dimly perceive an ideal world of forms, they both wound up touching on the same kinds of metaphors anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 5:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/18 "2017-03-07T05:58:43Z")

</div>

Actually Paul was a well-educated man who virtually certainly was familiar with the Greek philosophers.  
link: [http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2014/12/saint-pauls-application-of-greek.html](http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2014/12/saint-pauls-application-of-greek.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulfreida](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ulfreida/32/8014_2.png) [@Ulfreida](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ulfreida)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 6:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/19 "2017-03-07T06:02:19Z")

</div>

Although this writer believes the Greek thought in Paul could have been inserted by later unknown persons.  
[http://www.personal.psu.edu/cpl2/blogs/digitaldialogue/2009/11/plato-or-paul.html](http://www.personal.psu.edu/cpl2/blogs/digitaldialogue/2009/11/plato-or-paul.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outlierrn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/outlierrn/32/3005_2.png) [@outlierrn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/outlierrn)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2017, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/interesting-phrase-origin-of-bible-verse-for-now-we-see-through-a-glass-darkly/781406/20 "2017-03-07T06:31:03Z")

</div>

If memory serves, Crazy Horse was credited with saying something similar about this world being shadows of the real world.
