# Intrusive? Racist? Useful concern? All of the above? (Stranger questions interracial family photos)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 7, 2015, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258 "2015-01-07T20:14:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dracoi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90db22/32.png) [@dracoi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dracoi)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2015, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/21 "2015-01-07T22:55:10Z")

</div>

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> Funny…black people don’t feel that way about “stop-and-frisk” policies. But you think men should just accept a general suspicion of their motives and intrusive questioning by strangers whenever they are seen to interact with young girls?

I wouldn’t conflate stop and frisk as being equivalent with politely asking a question.

Frisking is a search and therefore must have “due process” fulfilled. We could debate what constitutes due process, but there’s a legal standard of some sort there.

To my knowledge, there’s no due process requirement for politely asking a question. And the example we’re talking about doesn’t fit my definition of “intrusive questioning.” I don’t know what you think was intrusive. Are we now going to prevent people from using “What’s up?” as a greeting?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2015, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/22 "2015-01-07T23:01:09Z")

</div>

Quiting from quoted article:" … the girls stood in their usual spot against the railing at the back of the boat. …  
Totally engaged with the scene in front of me, I jumped when a man came up beside me and said to my daughters: “I would be remiss if I didn’t ask if you were okay.”

I don’t get it. The man was on the boat with them?  
If the man really was Homeland Security, wouldn’t he have spoken directly to the adult, instead?  
My uninformed speculation is that if this actually happened, the man wasn’t an agent, but was a weird, tactless racist. And he was either on someone else’s boat, or they were all on a larger, ferry type boat.  
Strange story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2015, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/23 "2015-01-07T23:08:37Z")

</div>

Totally racist, to my mind. I don’t believe anyone who actually worked for homeland security would behave in any such fashion. And, if that’s a lie, and I firmly believe it is, it’s purpose is to distract/excuse blatant racism.

The Dad should have taken a photo of the guy, then asked his name. Then for proof he’s with HS. When he don’t have it, point out you’ll be contacting them with his photo, see how they feel about it. If he hems or haws, backtracks in any way, I’d have taken out my phone and called the police.

My money is on racist poser doucebag.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2015, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/24 "2015-01-07T23:20:57Z")

</div>

Why, if society is okay with police officers shooting anyone that might have some kind of weapon somewhere and might possibly use it sometime, shouldn’t society be okay with officers questioning anything and everything they think might possibly be not-quite-alright?

(Yes, I realize that this takes the man’s claim to work for DHS at face value, but everything else in the story is being taken at face value, isn’t it?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Slithy\_Tove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slithy_tove/32/18248_2.png) [@Slithy\_Tove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Slithy_Tove)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2015, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/25 "2015-01-07T23:37:28Z")

</div>

That was agent Clare Quilty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/26 "2015-01-08T00:58:08Z")

</div>

> [@Spice\_Weasel](#):
>
> 1. smiling and hugging
> 2. In public
> 3. In broad daylight
> 
> It just seems so very unlikely to me that true victimization happens this way.

My thoughts, too. If they were victims of trafficking/child porn, wouldn’t said photo shoot be happening in seclusion? And be…pornographic? Was this guy really expecting them to say no, we’re not OK?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Isamu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/7c8e57/32.png) [@Isamu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Isamu)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/27 "2015-01-08T01:08:01Z")

</div>

Homeland security lol.  
I thought your homeland might be in danger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/28 "2015-01-08T02:51:08Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> My thoughts, too. If they were victims of trafficking/child porn, wouldn’t said photo shoot be happening in seclusion? And be…pornographic? Was this guy really expecting them to say no, we’re not OK?

It happens. Many of the infamous prisoner/slave women of recent years _did_ go out in public during the periods of their captivity. At least a couple, such as Tanya Kach, escaped (after years) because of a momentary chance to confide in or beg help from a stranger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/29 "2015-01-08T03:36:52Z")

</div>

> [@Spice\_Weasel](#):
>
> 1. smiling and hugging
> 2. In public
> 3. In broad daylight
> 
> It just seems so very unlikely to me that true victimization happens this way.

You haven’t heard much about Elizabeth Smart?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/30 "2015-01-08T03:40:31Z")

</div>

> [@jimbuff314](#):
>
> Not to “diva up” **Bricker** ’s thread, but something happened yesterday that makes me wonder. My SO was in line at checkout line in store - I was looking at something off to the side. A couple was behind her - woman in control of the shopping cart. I came back (from being just off to the side) with my hands clearly empty and tried to stand behind my sweetie when the line moved up a bit. As soon as it did, the woman behind moved her cart up to close off the gap. This happened 2 more times. Finally I was able to hop in behind, whereupon the woman said aloud “He just cut in line! :eek:”
> 
> Pretty ordinary, huh? As I thought about it later, I wonder. I clearly had no groceries. The kicker, of course, is that I am a 6"3" brown-skinned American Indian and my SO is a 5’ blonde white lady. I think this was at least unconscious racism on her part. At any rate, it is something that I as a minority have to deal with out in the world.

Mostly when I do something like you did - both my partner and I make it obvious we are a couple - maybe by talking, maybe by having me take over the cart - maybe by holding hands…

And yes, we are different races

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 5:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/31 "2015-01-08T05:35:33Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Why, if society is okay with police officers shooting anyone that might have some kind of weapon somewhere and might possibly use it sometime, shouldn’t society be okay with officers questioning anything and everything they think might possibly be not-quite-alright?\

I see what your problem is. Society isn’t OK with that. Does that clear things up for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 7:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/32 "2015-01-08T07:10:26Z")

</div>

> [@Peremensoe](#):
>
> It happens. Many of the infamous prisoner/slave women of recent years _did_ go out in public during the periods of their captivity. At least a couple, such as Tanya Kach, escaped (after years) because of a momentary chance to confide in or beg help from a stranger.

True, but I don’t know, it just seems like the chances of actually running into a situation like that are pretty minuscule. It would just be so off my radar to assume that Asian girls being photographed by a white guy are Stockholm Syndrome afflicted victims of years of abuse. It would be like, as someone mentioned upthread, asking random women if their husbands are beating them because they just might be. There’s just no evidence here that these girls were in any kind of trouble.

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> Let’s see here, we have:
> 
> 1. a professional photographer (probably obvious by his equipment)
> 2. an unusual posing session (in my family, it’s “line up and click” not 15 minutes of posing.)
> 3. two under-age girls of a different race than the photographer

Also, going back to this, even if you assume the guy photographing them isn’t their father and think he’s a professional photographer, wouldn’t the other explanation be…he’s a professional photographer on a shoot? Like, is there some rule that photographers can only shoot subjects of the same race as they are?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 8:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/33 "2015-01-08T08:54:33Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> I see what your problem is. Society isn’t OK with that. Does that clear things up for you?

I don’t have a problem, but my opinion seems to differ from yours. It seems to me that society is fine with police shooting anyone that they think might possibly be dangerous at some time. My cite is, oh, the last 50 years of police shootings in America and the lack of negative outcomes towards the police for them.

You and I may not be okay with it, but society in general is. If society were not okay with it, surely laws and rules and regulations to prevent it would be in place and they would be followed, but as far as I can see, that isn’t the case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/34 "2015-01-08T13:49:25Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> I wouldn’t conflate stop and frisk as being equivalent with politely asking a question.
> 
> Frisking is a search and therefore must have “due process” fulfilled. We could debate what constitutes due process, but there’s a legal standard of some sort there.

OK, let’s dial it back from stop-and-frisk a bit. How about the constant low-level suspicion that some black folks complain about being subjected to? Things like:

-women holding tighter to their purses or locking their car doors when a black man is near by

-[clerks surreptitiously following black people around the store to make sure they aren’t stealing anything](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q32NhDy4ZQg)

Just as the vast majority of black people are not criminals, the vast majority of men who take photos of other-raced girls in public are not predators; it’s not surprising that upstanding persons in both categories would grow agitated when faced with preemptive suspicion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/35 "2015-01-08T14:08:17Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> All things considered, I’d rather see headlines that say “I was mildly inconvenienced by a concerned officer” than to read “Officers ignore sexually exploited girls because they didn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings.”

This to the max. I’ve been in situations where my credentials for being the responsible adult with various younger family members have been questioned, and yes it can be irritating especially if it’s been a trying day; however, the alternative of law enforcement or even concerned citizens ignoring the possibility of human trafficking has far worse consequences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZPG\_Zealot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e47c2d/32.png) [@ZPG\_Zealot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZPG_Zealot)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/36 "2015-01-08T14:12:09Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> My thoughts, too. If they were victims of trafficking/child porn, wouldn’t said photo shoot be happening in seclusion? And be…pornographic? Was this guy really expecting them to say no, we’re not OK?

No, the money shots for commercial child porn happen in seclusion, but a lot of underage porn in the United States is amateur and made by people who are “fans” to put it mildly. Pedophiles can be very good at convincing themselves that their relationships to their victims are normal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/37 "2015-01-08T14:13:50Z")

</div>

> [@ZPG\_Zealot](#):
>
> …however, the alternative of law enforcement or even concerned citizens ignoring the possibility of human trafficking has far worse consequences.

I don’t think people are suggesting that the possibility of wrong-doing should be ignored; rather, that the threshold for intervention be raised to something more than just “hey, that guy is taking pictures of those girls.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/38 "2015-01-08T14:49:58Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> I don’t have a problem, but my opinion seems to differ from yours. It seems to me that society is fine with police shooting anyone that they think might possibly be dangerous at some time. My cite is, oh, the last 50 years of police shootings in America and the lack of negative outcomes towards the police for them.
> 
> You and I may not be okay with it, but society in general is. If society were not okay with it, surely laws and rules and regulations to prevent it would be in place and they would be followed, but as far as I can see, that isn’t the case.

This is an “opinion” in the same sense that creationism is an opinion.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/39 "2015-01-08T14:54:21Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> I’m just trying to get a sense of where “rude” stops and “legitimate concern” begins.

When a “legitimate concern” is so nebulous, speculative, and supported very little factually that acting on it is substantially more likely to inflict grief on an innocent person than provide relief to a victim, then it’s prudent to reassess the decision to act on that concern.

“I would be remiss if I didn’t ask if you were okay.”

Okay, worse case scenario, the girls are being held there against their will and were _not_ okay. Does this concerned stranger really think the girls would make this obvious to him _while the kidnapper is standing right there?_ If they felt that empowered to speak up, they would likely have fled already. So what else could he have done? Gee, I dunno, why not make small talk with the photographer and assess the suspiciousness of his behavior directly? The guy didn’t do this probably because it would mean giving him some benefit of the doubt and treating him like he wasn’t doing anything wrong. A lot of people find this difficult to do when they’ve jumped to a certain conclusion, but if they don’t want to be guilty of offending someone, it’s the right thing to do.

I’m inclined to think the guy intruded with his question, not because he thought the girls were really at risk, but because the thought of not acting on the _mere possibility_ made him think he’d be kicking himself later that night with guilt. Which is a selfish reason, no matter how well-meaning it might be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2015, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258/40 "2015-01-08T15:42:41Z")

</div>

He could have just hung about till one of the girls said, “Dad, aren’t we done yet?”

Pretty obvious, simple and most unobtrusive way to allay his misplaced fear/paranoia. THAT’s what a Homeland Security person would do first, I suspect. Or any thinking person, for that matter.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/intrusive-racist-useful-concern-all-of-the-above-stranger-questions-interracial-family-photos/709258.md?page=3)
