Parents don’t mind us asking questions. They want reassurance or validation that their concerns are justified. As a general rule parents worry about their kids and are happy to know that we care about them too.
I am a bit nervous about what the State will be asking me to do. I do not especially like the reliance on standardized instruments. They too often force clinicians to focus on the the piece of paper and the score and less on the patient in front of them. Governmental initiatives often focus on documentation and leave less time for the face to face, and that face to face time already has enough pressures on it. I prefer open ended questioning. Standardized instruments are perhaps more scientifically valid, but do not develop a relationship or trust.
Let us take postpartum depression. I’ve actually written a piece in our continuing education mainstay (Pediatrics in Review) on the role of the pediatrician in screening for postpartum mental illness. I feel strongly that we are in the best position to identify it, to demystify it, and to make appropriate referrals. In my mind all it takes is an awareness of when it tends to show up, and at those times asking some openended questions about how the Mom is doing, is she sleeping, eating, taking care of herself? My tactic was to convince practioneers that it takes little effort and that it effects the well being of their patients, the childrren. The more official approach is, however, to use that Edinburgh scale. This is a questionaire that the Mom fills out and is scored with particular values resulting in a referral. More time scoring a paper, less time talking to parents. But quality assurance requires documentation.
Another point. Postpartum depression at least has an easy action for us to take. There are several good national organizations (Depression After Delivery, Postpartum Support International, etc) to refer to, plus good adult psychiatrists and even just encouraging that she talk with her ob. Autism and early developmental disabilities also now can be easily referred to Child and Family Connections, a state organized and supported early intervention program. Having something to do with what you find encourages you to look for it. The resources for social and emotional problems are much less developed. Yes, there is potential harm of getting kids to someone who will overpathologize what is really just part of the wide spectrum of normal, or charge lots of dollars for little effective help. Good mental health care is very time consuming. And that time is poorly compensated. There is pressure on many in mental health to do it faster or starve. Thus diagnoses get rushed, potential quick fixes are jumped to. Lots of my time ends up with me doing nothing, but, hopefully, doing it well.
If this ends up with more high quality supports being available to patients and their families in a noncoercive way, if it ends up with a focus on educating practioneers on what to look for and how to help and only mandating standardized screening instruments if they are going to pay us for the time it takes to administer and score them, then I might be happy that it has occurred. But I am a little nervous about implementation of a well intended start.