Is 69 MPH the fastest any woman has ever thrown a baseball?

Speed is not the key factor in cricket either. There are plenty of bowlers out there at speeds that many women can easily attain.
The problem with a slower ball is that it has to be accurately pitched and shaped through the air or off the pitch by means of spin and seam position.
Where speed is the only weapon that the ball presents I doubt that any women can up to the necessary velocity. At a lower speed the ball has to pose other challenges and all these challenges are related to arm, wrist and finger strength and accuracy.
Can a woman get the necessary rpm on a spinning ball? probably not,
Can they be as accurate at a high enough speed as a mid-paced “seam” bowler? probably not.

I find this completely impossible to believe. They had a female college pitcher on a late night talk show a few years ago who threw in the 80s. I’ve known women who could throw 75 or better from level ground.

[QUOTE=Oakminster]
Greg Maddux didn’t throw very hard, especially towards the end of his career.
[/QUOTE]

In his youth and prime Maddux easily broke 90 anytime he wanted to. I know he didn’t look like it but he could bring some heat.

In MLB, a pitcher who maxes out in the high 80s is VERY slow.

In cricket bowlers cannot throw.

I am guessing if you get more basketball player-sized females like Jenny Finch and built up arm strength a bit and worked on conditioning, we would probably be able to get female pitchers to toss in the 70s or even 80s. I don’t know enough about anatomical differences (i e differences in muscle) to know whether or not such a female pitcher would be able to sustain throwing that hard without some wear and tear on the shoulder and elbows.

This sounds like a made-for-TV movie.

Why would the owner want them to lose?

Does anyone remember the legendary Joan Joyce, who happens to be from my home state of Connecticut?

This is a fascinating article, and mentions that she could throw a softball at least 70:

http://http://www.espn.com/espnw/news/article/6833700/best-ted-williams-ever-faced

For baseball, I don’t see this being a problem. The trick with the knuckleball is pitching it so there is as little spin on it as possible, so it tumbles unpredictably through the air. It doesn’t seem to me that men would have an inherent advantage here, other than perhaps pitching at slightly higher (maybe 5-10 mph) velocity. I certainly think that it’s possible that a female knuckleballer could make it in the majors.

Particularly if the NL continues to reject the designated hitter, and the female knuckleballer happens to be able to get base hits. Since not much is expected in the way of hitting from pitchers, the bar is low, so a woman who could bat in a run reliably would have a sort of bonus over other pitchers.

And no, men don’t have an inherent advantage over women in pitching knuckleballs. In fact, short women can pitch a weird sort of rising knuckleball that has to be seen to be believed. I’m not sure if it really rises, or if it’s an optical illusion from a short pitcher, but it’s amazing.

I once attended a Tim Wakefield vs Paul Byrd match up in Cleveland. No pitch was over 85 until the bullpens got involved.

When I was in high school I’d heard 85 might get you a look at an open tryout. These days, if you top out under 92 I don’t think you have a shot.

That’s the natural plot in baseball movies.