Is a house cat this large potentially dangerous to young kids?

Dogs are considerably more tractable than cats, and even a large one will learn to obey the commands of at least one person in the house. Cats don’t obey commands because they regard them as mere suggestions.

Don’t get me wrong, I love cats. Our Molly is the sweetest feline on this Earth, but she has a peculiarity in that she likes to nip my lower legs or arms when she wants something, sometimes to the point of drawing blood. As an adult I understand and deal with it, but I wouldn’t want to subject a tiny child to it.

A ignorant idiot. I now own one Bengal, and just recently my F2 “Throwback” Bengal passed away at the age of 16. Nothing wild other than their appearance.

Now sure a Savannah cat is pretty big, but I have a 25# Maine Coon, and no-one thinks they are dangerous. (other than small rodents, tiny dogs, etc). But yes I agree with asterion, one does not let a 25# Maine Coon cat attack your hand with full rabbit kicks, etc. Other than being powerful, he is incredibly loving and affectionate.

The trouble is, the animal’s reaction can change radically with no warning and do considerable damage very quickly. Just last night something startled my cat who was sleeping peacefully on my lap and he launched himself using my legs for traction. Large wounds on both thighs were the result. He’s not an aggressive cat but I would never leave a small child alone with him. Double or triple that with an at who was bigger, stronger or “wilder.”

What a gorgeous cat! We have a bengal with exactly the same markings but she’s absolutely puny compared to MAGIC.

Huey’s a used kitty I got through craigslist, so I don’t know how many generations removed he is from the wild. He was a breeder reject because he doesn’t have the wild markings–a stray melanistic gene or two must have snuck in–but he says he has a dream that he will be judged not by the color of his fur, but by his skill at napping. He is large, very gentle, and thinks water is the most interesting thing in the world.

I have to say, everything I’ve heard about Savannahs says they’re pretty good pets. Not the f1 and f2 generations, obviously, unless you know how to handle exotics, but as the cat:serval ration gets higher, they’re supposed to be great.

I think your ignorant idiot remark is over the top. A few years ago, I was very interested in adopting a savannah kitten. The research I did at the time changed my mind. Bengals have been around longer and are more predictable, more stable.
They are beautiful animals, but I wouldn’t have one around with a young child.

Both of the Minnesota breeders have small children. There’s even pics of them cuddled up next to their infant.

http://www.midwestmysticals.com/

What, no response? How many cat pictures like this do you see every day?

Well, sure - everyone knows that cats try to steal a baby’s breath. :slight_smile:

Spectre, that’a a lovely big fat kitty. :smiley:

The related videos are just too cute!

Why, oh why??

Mmm…as a cat person I’m conflicted about all of this.

Naively I think I could handle and be comfortable with a hybrid, as would my teenage children who love cats. My 15 yr daughter has been certain, since age 11 that her life’s calling is to work with tigers and protect them. I have no doubt she will do something like this even if she changes to orang-utans or other endangered animal. She’s steadily working through high school headed for zoology.

But I think the big cat rescue guy (in the link) talks a lot of sense. Wild cats are feral by nature and crossing them with domestic breeds is not going to suppress the carnivore until way way down the breeding line.

Right at this moment I am nursing a scar from trying to entice a lost domestic ginger I found today. He’ll come back, I’m sure he is somebody’s pet, he was happy to be near me, but when I tried to pick him up - he became a basket of needles. Cats are wonderful but very close to the wild.

http://cheezburger.com/41980417 (video)

[tangent] would it have been dangerous to pet that? there seem to be no hostility in its body language. [/tangent]

it didn’t actually attack you did it? most likely it was just reacting negatively to being manhandled by a stranger and its claws came out instinctively during its attempt to free itself.

Yes absolutely correct. All I’m doing is pointing out that even the standard domestic cat has sharp edges if it feels threatened. In fairness that adds nothing to the discussion. :smiley: I’ve lived with cat scratches for many years as affectionate reminders that my feline friends are not completely tame.

Reminds me of the numerous “Animal Cops” episodes where the staff seizes cats, claiming “they’re not socialized”. My own cats don’t want to be picked up & cuddled, although you can kneel & scratch heads all you want. Heck, I don’t want anybody trying to cuddle ME! But that isn’t necessarily “overly viscious”.

All they needed to do was stretch out their leg and nudge it - that makes my cat jump off the bed all the time. :smiley:

Sigh. We’ve been over this before on the SDMB. Pit bulls are dogs, not monsters. They’re known among dog experts for being human-friendly and not very territorial.

Uh, the reason cats are the way they are is not so much how “close to the wild” they are (whatever that means) but that they do not have a pack social structure like dogs do. Dogs look up to humans and are accustomed to accepting human leadership, and they have strong social bonds, famously exhibiting altruism to humans, other dogs, and even other animals.

Word. A Jack Russell Terrier killed an infant in Tennessee. It’s unwise to leave infants or small children unsupervised PERIOD, let alone with an animal.

Dogs have been domesticated way longer than cats. So technically kitties are “closer to the wild”.

It’s unsafe to leave adults near a Jack Russell Terrier.

One of those fuckers chased a group of us up a cliff that we had been climbing that afternoon.