Ferrets are not rodents…
… they are insects.
OK, they’re Mustelids.
Ferrets are not rodents…
… they are insects.
OK, they’re Mustelids.
Oddly, when I’m thinking ahead of myself, I do sometimes type a word beginning with the first letter of the next word, but in this particular case, I think I must have just re-worded the sentence and placed the caret in the wrong position.
We’re actually looking into revising the ordinance for completely unrelated reasons. The sign ordinance doesn’t take into account anything like road speeds, development size, topography, &c. in the standards set out. Since we’re going to go into it and tinker, I’d like to clear up a few things, if possible. The language in the ordinance is a train wreck, to boot, so I’d really like for it to be more readable. We’ve recently had a number of inquiries about LED signs and I was quite unsure whether we really needed to accomodate them somehow.
You’re joking ?
( apologies for compressing open lines from quote )
Damn. You’re not joking.
( their italics )
I sit corrected. I should have said, they LOOK like rodents. However, they are clearly not insects. You evil man, you. You wanted to frighten us with mental images of immense FLYING ferrets?? Hah !
But what is the regulation trying to accomplish? Is it just to control glare and avoid distracting motorists?
For the OP…
I work in the airline industry, with signs and general illumination specifically, where LEDs are really taking off bada ching
There is no practical difference in lightsource from LED versus any “pointsource” light such as filament-based lights as far as you ability to control the appearance or dispersion of the light is concerned. I’d argue that LEDs have vastly more flexibility for a sign application such as yours. Using gels, filters, lenses, or reflectors, the can be made as arbitrarily diffuse, bright, focused, as you desire.
It seems a really trivial problem and solution, that is getting derailed by obsolete regulation and beauracracy (sadly an all too common hurdle in the engineering world).
That’s why I’m asking the question.
:smack:
You mean no visible bare light source or immediately adjacent reflective surfaces? I assume it’s a light-pollution issue rather than aesthetic.