# Is a National Security Court the Answer? Or A Special Court for Special People

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-national-security-court-the-answer-or-a-special-court-for-special-people/502328>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 8, 2009, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-national-security-court-the-answer-or-a-special-court-for-special-people/502328 "2009-07-08T13:27:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2009, 2:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-national-security-court-the-answer-or-a-special-court-for-special-people/502328/21 "2009-07-09T02:55:54Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Maybe, terrorists should be tried by a third party neutral country. Or international court.

If there’s a good case for that other country to have jurisdiction, fine by me. But I can’t see America as a whole supporting that.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-national-security-court-the-answer-or-a-special-court-for-special-people/502328.md?page=1)