# Is a Statin absolutely necessary?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [November 3, 2021, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762 "2021-11-03T22:54:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![audiobottle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bc8723/32.png) [@audiobottle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/audiobottle)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 2:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/42 "2021-11-06T02:52:11Z")

</div>

As Doctor **Qadgop** noted, in the absence of symptoms there is not much utility in doing those types of scans. Along the lines of what you said, however, there is good evidence that showing patients their calcium score scans or CTA coronary scans increases statin adherence, most likely exactly for the reason you alluded to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Newtosite](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/newtosite/32/8623_2.png) [@Newtosite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Newtosite)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/43 "2021-11-06T03:58:04Z")

</div>

Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/44 "2021-11-06T22:38:52Z")

</div>

I remember seeing xanthomas and xanthelasmas on people all the time, although I didn’t know what they were called or what they were. You don’t see as much of that nowadays.

> **[Xanthomas | DermNet](https://dermnetnz.org/topics/xanthoma)**
>
> Xanthoma, Xanthomatosis. Authoritative facts from DermNet New Zealand.

> **[Xanthelasma](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanthelasma)**
>
> Xanthelasma is a sharply demarcated yellowish deposit of cholesterol underneath the skin. It usually occurs on or around the eyelids (xanthelasma palpebrarum, abbreviated XP). While they are neither harmful to the skin nor painful, these minor growths may be disfiguring and can be removed. There is a growing body of evidence for the association between xanthelasma deposits and blood low-density lipoprotein levels and increased risk of atherosclerosis.
> A xanthelasma may be referred to as a xantho...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_Paprika](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr_paprika/32/3042_2.png) [@Dr\_Paprika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr_Paprika)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 12:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/45 "2021-11-07T00:52:35Z")

</div>

Sometimes they can be subtle, like when they are on the hand. We’re they once very common?

I read today a somewhat out there book by an expert on Alzheimer’s disease. He thought statins used to further lower _normal_ levels of cholesterol increased the rate of dementias. I don’t know how true this is; will have to look into it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_Paprika](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr_paprika/32/3042_2.png) [@Dr\_Paprika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr_Paprika)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/46 "2021-11-07T01:36:01Z")

</div>

A quick review shows the issue to be controversial. Several studies show statins decrease dementia risk and are neuroprotectibve; some studies do not show much effect. Only a few show statins increase risk.

If any Dopers know more about this than I do, please discuss your thoughts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/47 "2021-11-07T02:21:12Z")

</div>

I’m just going to say that when I worked at the pharmacy that serviced nursing homes, I was horrified at how many people were obviously in late-stage dementia, and yet they still got cholesterol meds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 9:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/48 "2021-11-07T09:31:24Z")

</div>

> [@Dr\_Paprika](#):
>
> I read today a somewhat out there book by an expert on Alzheimer’s disease. He thought statins used to further lower _normal_ levels of cholesterol increased the rate of dementias. I don’t know how true this is; will have to look into it.

> [@Dr\_Paprika](#):
>
> A quick review shows the issue to be controversial. Several studies show statins decrease dementia risk and are neuroprotectibve; some studies do not show much effect. Only a few show statins increase risk.
> 
> If any Dopers know more about this than I do, please discuss your thoughts.

It’s not the I know more, it’s that I have thoughts. 😉

Your body actually does need cholesterol. It’s used for a lot of things. The problem is usually seen as too much cholesterol, which can be bad. That’s true of a lot of needed things, like salt or potassium or protein or iron or sugar… all of which can cause problems (even death in some cases) if in excess.

So… if you lower cholesterol below what the body actually needs to function properly then sure, I could see it causing problems. Since cholesterol has a vital use for nerves, including the central nervous system, it wouldn’t surprise me if cholesterol that was too low could start causing serious problems. It’s just that cholesterol that’s too low isn’t seen very often. I think the most common cause might be starvation, which is not a problem seen often in the West these days.

The tough part is proving it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_Paprika](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr_paprika/32/3042_2.png) [@Dr\_Paprika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr_Paprika)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/49 "2021-11-07T20:18:35Z")

</div>

As I said above cholesterol is needed to make cell membranes, steroids and other hormones.

I’m not sure anyone truly knows what LDL cholesterol level is too low _after treatment with statins_ (and not just naturally), but the author (Bredesen) suggested 150. However, he also recommended so many esoteric tests and supplements of dubious value it is hard to fit me to take him seriously, despite being a recognized expert.

Still, he is right the issue is not definitively settled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nearwildheaven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/90db22/32.png) [@nearwildheaven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/nearwildheaven)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/50 "2021-11-07T23:53:22Z")

</div>

It would be almost impossible for a person to have an overall cholesterol level that’s too low, and if they did, most likely they would be in liver failure, and their cholesterol would be the least of their problems.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![audiobottle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bc8723/32.png) [@audiobottle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/audiobottle)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2021, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762/51 "2021-11-08T00:56:53Z")

</div>

The current thinking is that there is essentially no lower limit on LDL lowering, and some non-American medical associations actually recommend much stricter targets than what is currently in the US guidelines. Population/retrospective studies have shows a general lower incidence of dementia for patients who take statins, likely due to the lower risk of ischemic vascular disease. Like any med, there is good and bad to it, but overall the benefit has far outweighed the downsides, both known and theoretical.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-a-statin-absolutely-necessary/953762.md?page=2)
