# Is Breitbart a better news source than Rawstory? **URL:** \ **Category:** In My Humble Opinion\ **Created:** [March 2, 2020, 9:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-breitbart-a-better-news-source-than-rawstory/848777 "2020-03-02T09:07:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Capn\_Carl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/838e76/32.png) [@Capn\_Carl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capn_Carl)\ **Post date:** [March 7, 2020, 10:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-breitbart-a-better-news-source-than-rawstory/848777/21 "2020-03-07T10:00:58Z")
I’ll repeat what others have already asked; why read either? They’re both crap. You can get more information and entertainment from The Onion. ---
**Author:** ![road\_lobo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/d78d45/32.png) [@road\_lobo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/road_lobo)\ **Post date:** [March 7, 2020, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-breitbart-a-better-news-source-than-rawstory/848777/22 "2020-03-07T13:17:37Z")
> [@Senegoid](#): > > But disabling JS is a mixed blessing. It also disables certain other kinds of content. I find that some (but not all) photos are blocked without JS. Commercial sites (like your bank account) typically require JS. Many sites load much faster without JS (because they load a lot less stuff), but some content may be missing. > > ETA: Try it with AlterNet and RawStory too. You can has granular control of javascript: Noscript > **[NoScript Security Suite – Get this Extension for 🦊 Firefox (en-US)](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/)** > > Download NoScript Security Suite for Firefox. The best security you can get in a web browser! Allow potentially malicious web content to run only from sites you trust. Protect yourself against XSS other web security exploits. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-breitbart-a-better-news-source-than-rawstory/848777.md?page=1)