# Is complaining about the technical performance of the board permissible?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [August 14, 2007, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593 "2007-08-14T19:14:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DudleyGarrett](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d9b06d/32.png) [@DudleyGarrett](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DudleyGarrett)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/1 "2007-08-14T19:14:51Z")

</div>

A [thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=431987) started by the now-banned **Johnny Hildo** has been closed. I understand the banning of Johnny Hildo because of the comments he made, but why close the thread? Is it not permissible to complain about the performance of the board? I know it’s not _necessarily_ a logical conclusion, but it’s enough for me to ask for clarity. Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/2 "2007-08-14T19:18:03Z")

</div>

Complain as much as you like. (Within the rules, of course.)

Threaten to sue? No.

[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/rules.php](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/rules.php)?

**We reserve the right to ban a subscriber without warning in extreme cases, including but not limited to threats against the SDMB or users thereof or the Reader or its agents, regardless of where or how the threat is expressed. We are the sole judge of what constitutes an extreme case.**

There is a difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/3 "2007-08-14T19:18:47Z")

</div>

You’re welcome to start another thread if you want to complain some more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 7:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/4 "2007-08-14T19:19:53Z")

</div>

Another justification of closing that particular thread would be that many posters were (justifiably) bagging on **Johnny** and, because he was banned, he can’t reply.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DudleyGarrett](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d9b06d/32.png) [@DudleyGarrett](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DudleyGarrett)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 7:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/5 "2007-08-14T19:21:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=TubaDiva]  
You’re welcome to start another thread if you want to complain some more.  
[/QUOTE]

Sweet. Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fluiddruid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c2a13f/32.png) [@fluiddruid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fluiddruid)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2007, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-complaining-about-the-technical-performance-of-the-board-permissible/415593/6 "2007-08-14T20:24:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=hajario]  
Another justification of closing that particular thread would be that many posters were (justifiably) bagging on **Johnny** and, because he was banned, he can’t reply.  
[/QUOTE]  
That’s why it was closed.
