Is "Cultural Marxism" a real thing?

That’s the book I linked to in my post just above yours, but your take on it is very distorting.

No, that is not what either the article or the book shows. Both discuss Krishnamacharya as one of the major influences on the early 20th-century hybridization of traditional hatha yoga and other yoga practices (not just Vivekananda’s meditation-focused approach) with European physical-culture regimens. But they don’t say that Krishnamacharya created modern yoga:

Okay, enough from me about yoga in a thread on Cultural Marxism, sorry and carry on.

The first sentence of his wikipedia entry is “Often referred to as “The Father of Modern Yoga,”[3][4][5] Krishnamacharya is widely regarded as one of the most influential yoga teachers of the 20th century and is credited with the revival of hatha yoga.” Saying the Father of Modern Yoga did not create modern yoga is splitting hairs.

I did not say that those practicing identity politics are cultural Marxists only that a particular kind of identity politics that emphasizes destroying or displacing the structures of society is on outgrowth of cultural marxists.
It has to do with the way ideas are promulgated in society.
The way it works is that cultural marxists come up with an idea, “lets apply Marx’s theories to race and gender”. Then they or their followers come up with a framework, “White people or men have constructed society to oppress women or black people just like Capitalists did to oppress workers”. Then intellectuals and popularizers take that framework and build on it. “There is such a thing as the partriachy/white supremacy that exists in our society and it is oppresses women/blacks” Then influencers try to build a movement, " Patriarchy/White supremacism is bad, Lets build a movement to fight it". Then politicians other people in power try to appeal to that movement by crafting policies “Only black people/women should be allowed to speak during meetings.” No one in this chain needs to know about anything before the step they are on.
The only people who would identify as cultural marxist would be those in the first step and many of those are old or dead now. There probably aren’t enough self identifying cultural marxists to fill a good size movie theater. The problem is not the amount of people but rather their ideas which have grown in influence.
In the yoga analogy, the women who put on their tights and go down to the studio to workout using the various positions all have been influenced by Prussian fitness enthusiast who died 150 years ago despite not having the first clue how.

Is Hillary Clinton one of those Cultural Marxists?

That’s diametrically opposed to Marxist and communist ideas, which makes ‘cultural marxism’ a contradiction in terms.

This isn’t Marx’s formulation, and he certainly didn’t believe society was ‘constructed’ at all (it evolved, based on economic and technological processes, it wasn’t ‘designed’ or ‘constructed’).

Anyway, you can’t just apply class-based analysis to race or gender and call it “Marxism”. That’s like saying that the real Resurrected Messiah was Apolonius of Tyana, not Jesus, and then calling it “Apollonian Christianity”. A Marxism that isn’t primarily focused on the ownership of the means of production isn’t Marxism.

That would be like saying that since George Washington is a founding father that therefore there is no one else.

I see then that Krishnamacharya as the most important one that made modern yoga a thing in the western world. While in the original locations he would be seen more like one that popularized the thing in the modern world outside India, and that is the case:

http://www.mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?25096/Yoga+Its+Origin+History+and+Development

So they call him a great teacher, but not the main one nor the father.

Again, who were these people? Even if they’re old or dead, who were these self identified Cultural Marxists? Did they write anything? What groups did they start?

And how did they spread these ideas? I know you mentioned their followers and then influencers and so on, but how did that work? It’s not like Marxism is all that successful in the US. There’s not a big group of influential Communists in this country that shape public opiniom, nor are there a lot of Communist footsoldiers.

One does not have to be a communist to be influenced by the Cultural Marxists.
The original cultural marxists were of the frankfurt school and were people such as Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, and Erich Fromm. They developed critical theory. It is very influential in the humanities.
From there scholars such as Derrick Bell, Patricia Williams, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Mari Matsuda developed critical race theory. Scholars such as Judith Butler, Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Selma James helped create critical gender theory.
Popularizers of Critical Race theory include Ta-Nehisi Coates and Michelle Alexander.
Popularizers of Critical gender theory includeBarbara Ehrenreich.

Based on the latest from puddleglum, it is clear that he is following the school of “because I said so” from the current conspiracy theorists of the right. And the school they are learning from is mostly the worst kind of right: the one that is more in tune with the neo Nazis of today:

I’m finding this re-writing of history to shoehorn in a nonsense phrase rather amusing.

nm

So you are admitting it is pejorative term, which allows a person to discount an entire concept through an attribution error is the main purpose of the term?

Because a group may look to make an individuals trait like skin tone or gender stateless in society where all are equal may qualify as a “Cultural Marxist”

But by that same line of thinking, Europeans who consider Finnish people non-European could(and do) refer to them as “Snow n*gg**s”

The term was coopted by neo-Nazis who want a word expressing contempt or disapproval.

[

](Cultural Marxism - RationalWiki)

The claim that “Cultural Marxists taking over culture!”, is purely Nazi propaganda updated for the modern era.

It plays the role of the enemy in the neo-Nazi movement

It is not being used to describe something related to “Frankfurt School’s Marxist ideology to the social sciences.”

I wish lefties had 10% of the power conservatives thought they did.

“Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds” is one of the more popular catchphrases in leftist spaces I’ve seen. Maybe they can delineate the differences, but at some point you’re either for socialism or barbarism. That, or they just run this heuristic: everyone to the right of me is a Nazi, everyone to my left is a tankie (or infantile leftist)