# Is date rape less wrong than stranger rape?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 1, 2010, 3:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197 "2010-02-01T03:12:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/41 "2010-02-01T22:00:15Z")

</div>

> [@MitzeKatze](#):
>
> That is not what I am saying at all though. My point is that we, as participants in this discussion cannot say which is worse or which is more traumatic unless we know the details. Saying “Is date rape just as bad…” or “is stranger-rape worse…” doesn’t mean anything at all unless we know what kind of “rape” is being discussed. All “rape” is not equal and some rapes are far far worse than others.

Yes it is. All rape is equal. There are not “degrees” of rape. Rape is rape is rape. There are no mitigating circumstances.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/42 "2010-02-01T22:03:38Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> As **Jimmy** points out, legally there is no such thing as date rape. But my OP wasn’t really a legal question–sorry if that wasn’t clear. I just mean that when we think of who’s a “worse” person or likely to be a worse father, can we make a moral distinction between the man who committed a date rape and the man who committed a stranger rape?
> 
> I’d also argue that the girl who changed her mind wasn’t in fact raped so throwing her in with date rape just clouds the issue.

But that’s the intention of course. To contrive an obfuscatory hypothetical where a guy is confused about consent, or manipulated or falsely accused in order to dismiss all claims of date rape as illegitimate and a “different degree” of rape. It does confuse the issue and ignore the real question, which is, whether it’s less bad for a guy to rape a woman he knows than to rape a woman he doesn’t know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/43 "2010-02-01T22:04:14Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Yes it is. All rape is equal. There are not “degrees” of rape. Rape is rape is rape. There are no mitigating circumstances.

Are there any exacerbating circumstances?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/44 "2010-02-01T22:08:58Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> I suspect many people automatically assume that a “stranger rape” is worse because it is likely to be more violent. Admittedly that is merely an assumption.

It could also be argued that a date rape, or a rape by someone the victim trusted could be even more emotionally traumatic because of the betrayal and disorientation involved, not to mention the possibility of still having to see and interact with the rapist, or people the rapist knows.

A stranger is probably more likely to use a weapon, but that doesn’t really make a date-rapist any better of a person.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/45 "2010-02-01T22:10:09Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> Are there any exacerbating circumstances?

Yes, but that wasn’t the question, nor are exacerbating circumstances specific to whether the victim kniows the rapist or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/46 "2010-02-01T22:17:36Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Yes, but that wasn’t the question, nor are exacerbating circumstances specific to whether the victim kniows the rapist or not.

It seems to be a mirror-image. If there can be exacerbating circumstances, then it logically follows that not all rapes (and not all rapists) are equal. Some are _worse_ than others.

Admittedly you make a good point that the psychological harms can in some cases be worse because the victim knows the perp. OTOH, the reason people tend to believe that stranger rape is worse, is the perception (again, an assumption which may or may not be true) that a stranger is more likely to use _violence_ as their tool for rape - thus putting the victim in (often justified) fear for their life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CJJ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecc23a/32.png) [@CJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CJJ)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/47 "2010-02-01T22:17:41Z")

</div>

Rape is wrong by definition because the term “rape” means “wrongful sexual congress”, the same way that “murder” is wrong because the word literally means “wrongful killing”.

But the OP’s question is fair because we recognize levels of unlawful killing. In particular, premeditation seems to make killing far more heinous. Perhaps the debate could advance if we considered something like “premeditated rape”–which I think is closer to what the OP means by “stranger rape”–versus “non-premediated sexual violence” (I agree with **DtC** that there’s no such thing as “non-violent rape”, but I also want to avoid the semantic associations of the word, so I’m stuck with the pretty weak circumlocution).

Some witty commentor will no doubt call it the ultimate “crime of passion”, but still, does pre-meditation affect the degree of immorality in sucha a sex crime as it does with killing?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MitzeKatze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ad7895/32.png) [@MitzeKatze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MitzeKatze)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/48 "2010-02-01T22:28:42Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Yes it is. All rape is equal. There are not “degrees” of rape. Rape is rape is rape. There are no mitigating circumstances.

There are. Rape varies from misdemeanor sexual assault to felony sexual assault and all manner in between. Statutory rape is not the same as forcible rape which is not the same as “rape” only because of intoxication. [Cite](http://www.grllaw.com/PracticeAreas/Sexual-Assault-Rape.asp) [Another Cite](http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/rape) [Third Cite](http://ub-counseling.buffalo.edu/legal.php)  
ETA: and whether the rapist is known to the victim or not has nothing to do with what type of rape has been committed. First degree sexual assault (forcible rape) is the same whether the victim is on a date or not, and non-violent rape only because the woman was too drunk to legally consent could happen with a stranger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/49 "2010-02-01T22:32:58Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> It seems to be a mirror-image. If there can be exacerbating circumstances, then it logically follows that not all rapes (and not all rapists) are equal. Some are _worse_ than others.

I would say that the _per se_ rape is a separate and equal crime from aggravating factors, which are aggravating but not defining. It’s rape v. rape plus. Culpability is not lessened by not using a weapon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/50 "2010-02-01T22:36:36Z")

</div>

> [@MitzeKatze](#):
>
> There are. Rape varies from misdemeanor sexual assault to felony sexual assault and all manner in between. Statutory rape is not the same as forcible rape which is not the same as “rape” only because of intoxication. [Cite](http://www.grllaw.com/PracticeAreas/Sexual-Assault-Rape.asp) [Another Cite](http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/rape) [Third Cite](http://ub-counseling.buffalo.edu/legal.php)

Legal distinctions are irrelevant to the thread, and not all sexual assault is rape.

Rape is forcing someone to have sex with you against their will. There are no “degrees” of badness for that. It’s all equal.

> [@](#):
>
> ETA: and whether the rapist is known to the victim or not has nothing to do with what type of rape has been committed. First degree sexual assault (forcible rape) is the same whether the victim is on a date or not, and non-violent rape only because the woman was too drunk to legally consent could happen with a stranger.

There’s no such thing as non-violent rape.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MitzeKatze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ad7895/32.png) [@MitzeKatze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MitzeKatze)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/51 "2010-02-01T22:42:50Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Legal distinctions are irrelevant to the thread, and not all sexual assault is rape.

Legal distinctions are exactly what is being discussed. The OP is making a comparison only between forcible rape while on a date (her definition of “date-rape”) and forcible rape by a stranger.In that case, they are equally wrong, same crime. The other areas of “date-rape” are different than forcible rape, and the legal distinctions also happen to be the distinctions between the actions in a non-legal sense.

Not all sexual assault is rape, but all rape is sexual assault.

> [@](#):
>
> Rape is forcing someone to have sex with you against their will. There are no “degrees” of badness for that. It’s all equal.
> 
> There’s no such thing as non-violent rape.

Rape is also having sex without explicit consent. If someone is under the influence of alcohol their judgment is impaired and they legally they cannot consent. Therefore consensual sex with a drunk woman is rape and also (probably) non-violent. That kind of “rape” is far, far less “bad” than forcible rape of anyone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/52 "2010-02-01T22:47:58Z")

</div>

Having sex with a woman who is too incapacitated by alcohol to give or deny consent is forcible rape and is a violent crime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Freudian\_Slit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/5daacb/32.png) [@Freudian\_Slit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Freudian_Slit)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/53 "2010-02-01T22:48:26Z")

</div>

I’m not asking less wrong in the legal sense. I’m asking less wrong as in is a guy who commits a date rape less of a bad person to you? Is he less likely to be a bad father compared with a man who commits a stranger rape?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Fight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/90ced4/32.png) [@Cat\_Fight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Fight)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/54 "2010-02-01T22:54:31Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> I’m not asking less wrong in the legal sense. I’m asking less wrong as in is a guy who commits a date rape less of a bad person to you? Is he less likely to be a bad father compared with a man who commits a stranger rape?

Still too hard to tell, outside of a case-by-case basis. Are the details of the rape a matter of public record? Has he been convicted, or just accused? WAG – if there is a history between the rapist and his victim, if she’s a friend or an ex, it will be much easier for people in his social circle to explain it away in order to retain their view of a friend. I guess either could be good or bad fathers – hell, serial killers have been known to be decent fathers. But it’s hard to see someone who targets someone who knows or trusts him over a complete stranger as less of a threat.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/55 "2010-02-01T22:59:11Z")

</div>

> [@Freudian\_Slit](#):
>
> I’m not asking less wrong in the legal sense. I’m asking less wrong as in is a guy who commits a date rape less of a bad person to you? Is he less likely to be a bad father compared with a man who commits a stranger rape?

Both have a propensity for criminal behaviour, and a lack of empathy for and contempt for the rights of others, all bad from the POV of fitness to be a parent.

To the extent that stranger rape is more associated with violence of the knife-to-a-neck variety, a stranger rapist also displays (on average) a willingness to use violence in furtherance of their ends, which is a yet _worse_ sign for parenthood on top of all the others.

Obviously, this is a case-by-case issue; for example, a “date rapist” sorta implies that the target of his rape is a person of the age of consent who would otherwise be a suitable “date”; lots of “non-stranger” rapists target family members, and such a person is ging to be more of a danger to their own kids than a “stranger rapist” who only targets adult strangers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MitzeKatze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ad7895/32.png) [@MitzeKatze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MitzeKatze)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/56 "2010-02-01T23:39:38Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Having sex with a woman who is too incapacitated by alcohol to give or deny consent is forcible rape and is a violent crime.

Cite?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MitzeKatze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ad7895/32.png) [@MitzeKatze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MitzeKatze)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/57 "2010-02-01T23:44:52Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> Both have a propensity for criminal behaviour, and a lack of empathy for and contempt for the rights of others, all bad from the POV of fitness to be a parent.

Bad, sure, and possibly in some opinions would make a “bad” parent. But having contempt for the rights of others does not make one “unfit” all by itself.

This was discussed on the thread that spawned this one…there are lots of personality traits that I would not want in the father of my children, but having a disagreeable (to whom?) personality does not preclude one (all by itself) from being a “good” parent.

> [@](#):
>
> Obviously, this is a case-by-case issue;

And this is what has been said (and is being argued) all along. It must judged upon a case by case basis before anyone can conclude the degree of “wrongness” or how “bad” it might be, in an ethical sense, in a moral sense, and in a legal sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MitzeKatze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ad7895/32.png) [@MitzeKatze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MitzeKatze)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2010, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/58 "2010-02-01T23:48:39Z")

</div>

> [@MitzeKatze](#):
>
> Cite?

I missed the edit window, but probably should have clarified this. The cite I am seeking is that it is a violent crime to have sex with a woman who is intoxicated (not to the point of being passed out or anything which would be “forcible rape” or first degree sexual assault).

But I would like to see any cite proving that a woman who has been drinking, but still consents (non-verbally even) to sex is a violent crime. As far as I know it can be and has been defined as “date-rape” and is a misdemeanor crime…where is the violence?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2010, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/59 "2010-02-02T01:46:20Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](#):
>
> Having sex with a woman who is too incapacitated by alcohol to give or deny consent is forcible rape and is a violent crime.

I don’t have time for a detailed response right now, but there is a whole world of difference between “incapacitated” as in comatose, passing out drunk, and had a few too many to drink, legally too drunk to drive.

Where would YOU draw the line?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2010, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197/60 "2010-02-02T01:52:38Z")

</div>

> [@bengangmo](#):
>
> I don’t have time for a detailed response right now, but there is a whole world of difference between “incapacitated” as in comatose, passing out drunk, and had a few too many to drink, legally too drunk to drive.

“A few too many,” or over the legal limit is not "incapacitated. “Incapacitated” means something, which is why I used that specific word.

> [@](#):
>
> Where would YOU draw the line?

As I said before, any ambiguity at all means no.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-date-rape-less-wrong-than-stranger-rape/527197.md?page=4)
