# is evolution a fact?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 19, 2011, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375 "2011-08-19T21:30:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![curiousprincegeorge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/dfb087/32.png) [@curiousprincegeorge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/curiousprincegeorge)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/1 "2011-08-19T21:30:29Z")

</div>

Is it correct to say this statement:

Evolution is a fact, the theory of evolution is theory.

evolution has been proven with:(pick which is fact)  
a) viruses  
b)those lizards on that Mediterranean island  
c)strawberries (someone once told me they used be smaller until 1800’s until we intervened to make them bigger)  
d)humans growing certain breeds of dogs  
e)any other credible demonstratable verifiable options  
And our scientific theory to describe the evolution is just a theory. We put together what we know to make a model of evolution. A model which may change.

In short:  
evolution is fact. Our understanding may be a theory, But the facts are the facts, and evolution is a fact. As certain as gravity.

would i be wrong to assume the above?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/2 "2011-08-19T21:39:29Z")

</div>

[TalkOrigins](http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html) has a page about this.

> [@](#):
>
> In science “fact” can only mean “confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent.”

> [@](#):
>
> Today, nearly all biologists acknowledge that evolution is a fact. The term theory is no longer appropriate except when referring to the various models that attempt to explain how life evolves… it is important to understand that the current questions about how life evolves in no way implies any disagreement over the fact of evolution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/3 "2011-08-19T21:40:15Z")

</div>

The phrase “just a theory” is never correct. A theory is the highest level of certainty in science. Saying that “evolution is just a theory” is comparable to saying “Obama is just the President of the United States”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/4 "2011-08-19T21:40:59Z")

</div>

Since this will necessarily get into discussion of what a scientific fact is, it’s better suited to Great Debates than General Questions.

Colibri  
General Questions Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barbitu8](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/839c29/32.png) [@barbitu8](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/barbitu8)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/5 "2011-08-19T21:46:21Z")

</div>

Evolution is a theory. To say “evolution is a fact,” but “theory of evolution” is a theory (besides being a tautology) doesn’t change anything. Evolution is as much a theory as gravity, which is also a theory and not a fact, the “Big Bang” theory, etc.

What opponents against the theory say is that although we can certainly show evolution at work, even in a petri dish, we cannot demonstrate that one species evolved into another species. This is false. Examples abound, but if you point out one, these “creationists” (fka “intelligent designers”) say that those are not examples of different species. I’ve given up arguing with them on that point. There was a reason federal case wherein the judge upheld the theory of creationism is the same thing as the theory of intelligent design.

See [Creationism Vs. Evolution - Scientific American](http://www.scientificamerican.com/report.cfm?id=creationism-vs-evolution)

Also [Rejection of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/6 "2011-08-19T21:46:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=curiousprincegeorge]  
Evolution is a fact, the theory of evolution is theory.  
[/QUOTE]

That species evolve is a fact. The exact mechanism by which we arrived at our present day species is subject to various theories, many of which intersect (i.e. there could be many ways that the various species evolved over time and got to where we are today).

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/7 "2011-08-19T21:52:37Z")

</div>

> [@barbitu8](#):
>
> Evolution is a theory. To say “evolution is a fact,” but “theory of evolution” is a theory (besides being a tautology) doesn’t change anything. Evolution is as much a theory as gravity, which is also a theory and not a fact, the “Big Bang” theory, etc.
> 
> What opponents against the theory say is that although we can certainly show evolution at work, even in a petri dish, we cannot demonstrate that one species evolved into another species.

Wouldn’t that mean evolution is a fact, and speciation is a theory?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/8 "2011-08-19T21:57:05Z")

</div>

That evolution has occurred (and does occur) is a fact, supported by a plethora of overwhelming evidence. Evolution is essentially proven.

Please don’t say “just a theory.” While we do use the word “theory” in everyday speech to describe hunch or conjecture, in the realm of science a Theory has been fashioned much more rigorously, and in many cases is all but proven. The term indicates a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has been derived from evidence in conjunction with established knowledge of mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. Theories are subject to scrutiny and are modified (fine-tuned, corrected, advanced) when new evidence or knowledge is introduced. While Theories defy absolute proof, they are widely accepted as true (within the limitations of what we can know) when they coherently explain what has happened and accurately predict what will happen. The Theory of Evolution, like the Theory of Gravity, holds up well in this regard.

Now that we’ve covered that, the Theory of Evolution addresses _how_ evolution occurred.

Those who dispute evolution generally ignore the facts at hand, and seem to base their disbelief on a lack of knowledge and understanding of it, and/or a belief that the Bible accurately relates what happened. In essence, it appears they don’t believe it because they don’t _want_ to believe it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![curiousprincegeorge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/dfb087/32.png) [@curiousprincegeorge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/curiousprincegeorge)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/9 "2011-08-19T21:57:49Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> That species evolve is a fact. The exact mechanism by which we arrived at our present day species is subject to various theories, many of which intersect (i.e. there could be many ways that the various species evolved over time and got to where we are today).
> 
> -XT

This what i meant. that species evolve is a fact. and our understanding of it as mechanism is theory.

My question was is that true. And I meant is it true in a factual kind of way as opposed to a debatable kind of way.

( I don’t mind it being changed to great debates, as long as it is great debate.[I had previously thought of it as fact,is it actually still a great debate?])

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/10 "2011-08-19T22:02:44Z")

</div>

> [@barbitu8](#):
>
> Evolution is a theory. To say “evolution is a fact,” but “theory of evolution” is a theory (besides being a tautology) doesn’t change anything. Evolution is as much a theory as gravity, which is also a theory and not a fact, the “Big Bang” theory, etc.

This isn’t correct. Evolution is a fact – it occurs. Gravity is a fact – it occurs. There is also a Theory of Evolution, describing how evolution occurs, and a Theory of Gravity describing how gravity occurs. So you have the process of evolution (fact) hand in hand with the Theory of Evolution (scientific Theory), and the force of gravity (fact) hand in hand with the Theory of Gravity (scientific Theory).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/11 "2011-08-19T22:06:50Z")

</div>

> [@curiousprincegeorge](#):
>
> ( I don’t mind it being changed to great debates, as long as it is great debate.[I had previously thought of it as fact,is it actually still a great debate?])

At least on this board, there won’t be too much dispute that evolution has occurred. Where I think the debate lies in what degree of certainty allows something to be called a “fact.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/12 "2011-08-19T22:08:14Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> Wouldn’t that mean evolution is a fact, and speciation is a theory?

No; it just means that the creationists are (again) denying reality. We [have](http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html) seen speciation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/13 "2011-08-19T22:08:24Z")

</div>

For what it’s worth: Creationism and Intelligent Design don’t even begin to resemble scientific Theories. They’re laughable concepts in that regard, at the level of “Human Babies are Brought by Storks Theory.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barbitu8](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/839c29/32.png) [@barbitu8](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/barbitu8)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/14 "2011-08-19T22:12:23Z")

</div>

> [@Gary\_T](#):
>
> This isn’t correct. Evolution is a fact – it occurs. Gravity is a fact – it occurs. There is also a Theory of Evolution, describing how evolution occurs, and a Theory of Gravity describing how gravity occurs. So you have the process of evolution (fact) hand in hand with the Theory of Evolution (scientific Theory), and the force of gravity (fact) hand in hand with the Theory of Gravity (scientific Theory).

There has been recent discussion in the scientific world that the theory of gravity is wrong, or at least incomplete. Dark matter has been stated as a possibility to uphold the present theory of gravity, but it may be that the theory as we know it is not complete or correct.

As I stated before, we can demonstrate examples of evolution in the laboratory, but that, alone, does not prove the theory of evolution. All the evidence supports it, but it is possible that it is incomplete or incorrect. Those who object to the theory maintain that evolution into a new species has not been shown (although it has).

“Gravity is a fact – it occurs”? That’s a conclusion you have drawn from observed events. Those events fit the theory, but perhaps other theories are possible, and perhaps some events don’t fit the theory, such as the slowing down of the big bang, which has involved the invoking of “dark matter” to make the theory fit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/15 "2011-08-19T22:13:38Z")

</div>

> [@Gary\_T](#):
>
> For what it’s worth: Creationism and Intelligent Design don’t even begin to resemble scientific Theories. They’re laughable concepts in that regard, at the level of “Human Babies are Brought by Storks Theory.”

I’ll have you know that it has been proven both that an adult stork could easily carry a baby, and that their homing capabilities are easily up to the challenge of locating a single human family.

[/DembskiMode]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/16 "2011-08-19T22:18:58Z")

</div>

> [@barbitu8](#):
>
> “Gravity is a fact – it occurs”? That’s a conclusion you have drawn from observed events. Those events fit the theory, but perhaps other theories are possible, and perhaps some events don’t fit the theory, such as the slowing down of the big bang, which has involved the invoking of “dark matter” to make the theory fit.

But that is true of any theory, there are always other possibilities. Possibly the best approach is to find the simplest theory that matches the observed evidence. Also, there is a difference between a theory being incomplete and incorrect.

Btw, I’m fairly sure you are incorrect that dark matter was invoked to explain the big bang “slowing down”. Quite the opposite, the expansion of the universe seems to be increasing, due to the even more mysterious dark energy. IIRC, dark matter was posited because it was noticed the rotation of gravities did not match the distribution of observable matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gary\_T](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Gary\_T](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gary_T)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/17 "2011-08-19T22:23:40Z")

</div>

> [@barbitu8](#):
>
> There has been recent discussion in the scientific world that the theory of gravity is wrong, or at least incomplete.

That’s how science works. Every Theory is subject to revision as warranted by new evidence.

> [@](#):
>
> “Gravity is a fact – it occurs”? That’s a conclusion you have drawn from observed events.

It’s observation of the consistent repetition of said events which makes it a fact. See “fact” in a dictionary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/18 "2011-08-19T22:31:28Z")

</div>

> [@Alka\_Seltzer](#):
>
> IIRC, dark matter was posited because it was noticed the rotation of gravities did not match the distribution of observable matter.

Galaxies, not gravities. 🙂 But yes, that was one of the reasons for the postulation of dark matter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![griffin1977](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/977dab/32.png) [@griffin1977](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/griffin1977)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/19 "2011-08-19T22:43:47Z")

</div>

There is no great comittee of scientists that have a big meeting and decides that idea X has graduated from a theory to fact.

The idea that the earth goes round the sun is a theory (Copernican Theory)  
The idea that disease is caused by microbes is a theory (Germ Theory)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alka\_Seltzer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c89c15/32.png) [@Alka\_Seltzer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alka_Seltzer)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2011, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375/20 "2011-08-19T22:44:24Z")

</div>

Bleh, word failure. :smack:

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-evolution-a-fact/593375.md?page=2)
