The video is dated Apr 4, 2108. The linked articles are dated Feb 29, 2019 and Nov 5, 2018 respectively.
The articles are misleading. The mat walking tomb guards do not carry pistols. The commander of the relief, (who is a tomb guard, but doesn’t pace back and forth with a rifle), carries a pistol.
OK, how about this one:
uploaded yesterday, and claimed to have been recorded on November 15th (presumably 2019). Relief commander carries a pistol, sentinels do not.or this one:
Uploaded two days ago, and claimed to have been recorded last November 6. Relief commander carries a pistol, sentinels do not.
The article dated 2/29/2019 speaks of the pistols being carried by the sentinels, but it only has pictures of the relief commander carrying the described pistol - not the sentinel(s).
Fair enough but it does show that, if the military was of a mind to, they could certainly add a pistol to the marching guards’ uniforms that would comport with their insane level of perfection for their uniforms.
If you want to say there is no point or see no reason why and so on that is a different discussion but clearly they can do it because they already do it.
In that video, the commander of the relief is 1) a sergeant (a Non-Commissioned Officer) and 2) the leader of the unit. The other two guards shown are 1) junior enlisted Soldiers and 2) in an infantry unit. Traditionally, in an infantry unit, leaders (officers and NCOs) would be armed with only a sidearm, and junior enlisted would be armed only with a rifle. In practice, that’s not necessarily how actual Soldiers in battle would be equipped, but for the purposes of ceremonial guards, having the sergeant who is the commander of the relief armed with a only a side-arm while the other guards are armed only with rifles is an element of the insane level of perfection for their uniforms.
Interesting.
When not inspecting the troops where does the sergeant hang out? Is he nearby or somewhere further away?
Geez, I wish now that I’d never brought up the pistols. As I said in my previous post, I was wrong about sentinels carrying pistols. To try to get this thread back on track, there are any number of special duty stations that have prestige associated with them, but that prestige comes because there’s always an associated challenge. The very difficulty of being accepted for, and doing well in, the position is part of the attraction for a certain kind of person. In terms of ceremonial perfection, the Marine guards at the White House might be considered as similar to the Tomb sentinels. Then there is the Marine Corps Silent Drill Platoon (if you’re in DC during the summer, you should go to see the Friday Evening Parades at the Marine Barracks, or the Sunset Parades at the Iwo Jima Memorial.) Think about Delta, SEALs, forward air controllers, rescue swimmers, smoke jumpers… In my old unit, the (mumble), you couldn’t even apply; you had to be specially selected. We were proud not just about being selected, but because we knew we were doing a tough – if not impossible – job better than anyone else could.
Non-sequitur but thanks and not sure why you think you are at fault. Do you think you are the only person who would have found that detail?
Remember where you are.
The OP was about why someone would want to be a guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, not about what kind of firearms they carry. I was trying to explain how Tomb guard was a particular instance of a wider phenomenon (volunteering for unusual duty) in the military. If I didn’t explain it very well, ask this guy.
100-Year-Old Sentinel Returns to the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
Nearby, underground.