# Is hate speech really not banned on the boards?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [October 31, 2015, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283 "2015-10-31T20:20:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ramira](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ramira/32/344_2.png) [@Ramira](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ramira)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/162 "2015-11-04T07:39:27Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> Say what? You can’t argue against a point without using the word “racist”. Why is that word so important. Ooohhhh, I remember, because you can claim to be using it in the clinical sense and deny that you intend it as the powerful insult it is.

Ah we forget you need your Safe Space from the powerful critical Trigger Words, even if used in an ordinary way, because Insult. Ouchies.

absolutely no control except against the percieved left ouchy words.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> What the fuck does that have to do with _anything_?

it is DrDeth. no more understanding has to be made, likes Games

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 7:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/163 "2015-11-04T07:49:51Z")

</div>

> [@Ramira](#):
>
> it is DrDeth. no more understanding has to be made, likes Games

Oh shit, NOW you’ve done it. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 1:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/164 "2015-11-04T13:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> [QUOTE=iiandyiiii]
> 
> Ah, but being allowed to call racists racist is more speech than not being allowed to.

It’s also more speech to call someone a liar or a cunt, but those are things that tend to quash actual debate. Which is why they are relegated to The Pit and disallowed in GD.  
[/QUOTE]

What he said.

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> Huh?
> 
> Why, the Pit is for insults, calling a Rushton groupie a racist is not an insult anymore than calling Mahmoud Ahmadinehad a Holocaust Denier is an insult.
> 
> Or do you think that term “Holocaust Denier” should be similarly banned in GD.

Again, what **magellan01** said. Calling someone a racist\* is\* an insult, and tends to shut down debate. That’s why it is not allowed in the forum for debates.

If you want to call someone a racist, knock yourself out, in the Pit. If you want to debate, knock yourself out, in GD. If you don’t want to debate, don’t. But “I don’t want to debate” does not establish “nobody else should debate either”.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 1:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/165 "2015-11-04T13:33:34Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> What he said.

I don’t believe it necessarily quashes debate – sometimes it sparks further debate. I doubt you’ll agree, which is fine. My affection for you remains strong despite our disagreements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/166 "2015-11-04T14:10:22Z")

</div>

Not only I disagree but the mods do as well.

> [@](#):
>
> My affection for you remains strong despite our disagreements.

That’s nice of you to say. And that time I quoted another poster, you were out of town! I was drunk! It won’t happen again!

It’s not you - it’s me.

😃

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 2:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/167 "2015-11-04T14:14:44Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Not only I disagree but the mods do as well.

Yes, though they agree with me that it’s acceptable to call posts and assertions racist.

> [@](#):
>
> That’s nice of you to say. And that time I quoted another poster, you were out of town! I was drunk! It won’t happen again!
> 
> It’s not you - it’s me.
> 
> 😃
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

You are forgiven, because I can’t quit you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/168 "2015-11-04T19:29:49Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> What the fuck does that have to do with _anything_?

MrDibble :“_If you’re unfamiliar with the contents of the work of Rushton and Lynn…_”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 7:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/169 "2015-11-04T19:46:24Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> What he said.  
> Again, what **magellan01** said. Calling someone a racist\* is\* an insult, and tends to shut down debate. That’s why it is not allowed in the forum for debates.
> 
> If you want to call someone a racist, knock yourself out, in the Pit. If you want to debate, knock yourself out, in GD. If you don’t want to debate, don’t. But “I don’t want to debate” does not establish “nobody else should debate either”.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

You didn’t answer my question.

How is calling a racist a “racist” anymore an insult than calling someone like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a “Holocaust Denier”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/170 "2015-11-04T20:37:47Z")

</div>

Having a “privileged” upbringing has nothing to do with “privilege” in these types of discussions. Your privilege is simply in not being discriminated against. Your privilege is simply in growing up in a first world country. I have the same privilege, relative to **MrDibble**. And no one would call my life “privileged.”

All he’s wanting you to do is pay attention to the fact that those who are not discriminated against in a certain area are not qualified to decide what is and is not offensive. He’s telling you that these “scientific racists” are just as offensive as someone coming up and shouting “nigger.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/171 "2015-11-04T21:12:08Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> As I stated in another thread, it truly amazes me that anyone—particularly those further to the left of the political spectrum—would want to make topics verboten. One would thing that people—again, especially more liberal people—would champion _more_ speech, not less. Yet, the two places that you would think would be sacrosanct bastions of exploring ideas, especially ideas that some people find uncomfortable would be a university campus and a debate board. But based on some of the opinions offered here and the bizarro-level insanity of speech codes and free speech zones (:rolleyes:) that have been instituted on campuses, we see that is not the case.
> 
> Sad.

Why? What about American liberalism would lead you to believe that we hold freedom of speech as a primary virtue? It’s merely a tool, a necessity for democracy. But it is a tool that needs to be checked, not an excuse to allow intolerance. Liberalism loathes intolerance, and is actually intolerant towards the intolerant.

And why would you think this board values freedom of speech as a primary virtue, either? It’s number one rule is “Don’t be a jerk.” The discussion here is about what crosses that line. And a lot of us don’t see how letting people say racist shit is any less jerkish than calling them racist. (Hell, **Marley** used to famously say that he would only “sometimes” moderate calling people racist. But **Marley** is gone, replaced by JC who said he would crack down but stopped after **Der Trihs** was suspended.)

Colleges are also about tolerance, which means not tolerating the intolerant. Yes, freedom of speech zones are stupid–because they further no goal but helping the establishment–the exact opposite of what liberalism is about. But being about tolerance does mean limiting the speech of the intolerant.

And, no, none of this is a contradiction. Being tolerant inevitably requires not tolerating intolerance. If people sat back and tolerated slavery, would that have been tolerant? If people sat back and tolerated male-only voting, would that have been tolerant? No, and neither is sitting back and tolerating bigoted speech.

Now, maybe a more libertarian style of liberalism would be contradicting itself. But American liberalism is not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/172 "2015-11-04T21:43:39Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> So, you don’t like pile-ons. You think they are uncivil. But you embrace using them as a tool to put an end to you having to read things you don’t like. Keep those pitchforks at the ready!

No, I don’t embrace using them. They just are the lesser evil to letting racism go unchecked.

It’s not about what I don’t like to see. (I have an ignore feature and I use it for bigots more than anything else) It’s about letting racists spread their racist ideas, and granting them legitimacy by arguing with them like there is anything to argue with.

You can ridicule a Creationist by calling them a Creationist. You can ridicule a climate change denialist by calling them a climate change denialist. You can ridicule a conspiracy theorist by calling them a conspiracy theorist. But you can’t ridicule a racist by calling them racist.

Bigots get a protection here that no one else does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2015, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/173 "2015-11-04T21:51:07Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> You didn’t answer my question.
> 
> How is calling a racist a “racist” anymore an insult than calling someone like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a “Holocaust Denier”?

Because that’s how the word is used. ‘N\*gger’ is an insult; ‘African-American’ isn’t. Why? Because that’s how the word is used.

Language acquires meaning thru consensus. You are correct that the process is mostly arbitrary, but that’s how it works.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/174 "2015-11-05T00:19:33Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> You didn’t answer my question.
> 
> How is calling a racist a “racist” anymore an insult than calling someone like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a “Holocaust Denier”?

Unless someone self-identifies as a racist, then it is a pejorative; an insult used by one who has lost the ability or patience to debate.

Pretending that the word racist can have some neutral attributive quality is like wondering why the blacks get mad when you call them “you people.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![inscrutable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/a88e4f/32.png) [@inscrutable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/inscrutable)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/175 "2015-11-05T00:32:12Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> It’s about letting racists spread their racist ideas.

Paranoid?  
What ideas are they spreading?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/176 "2015-11-05T00:40:50Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> Unless someone self-identifies as a racist, then it is a pejorative; an insult used by one who has lost the ability or patience to debate.
> 
> Pretending that the word racist can have some neutral attributive quality is like wondering why the blacks get mad when you call them “you people.”

Is “Holocaust denier” not a pejorative or insult?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/177 "2015-11-05T01:06:33Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Is “Holocaust denier” not a pejorative or insult?

It is. Neither term should be banned but let’s not live under the false pretense that they are simply benign descriptors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/178 "2015-11-05T01:16:55Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> It is. Neither term should be banned but let’s not live under the false pretense that they are simply benign descriptors.

I think they’re both descriptors, but I wouldn’t call them “benign”, and I doubt that others here would either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/179 "2015-11-05T01:37:46Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> Unless someone self-identifies as a racist, then it is a pejorative; an insult used by one who has lost the ability or patience to debate.

So then you feel that calling people who don’t self-identify as Holocaust Deniers “Holocaust Deniers” you are using an insult and have proven yourself to have “lost the ability of patience to debate”?

I ask because that is the logical conclusion of your reasoning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/180 "2015-11-05T04:28:42Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> It is. Neither term should be banned but let’s not live under the false pretense that they are simply benign descriptors.

So if someone claims that the Holocaust never happened, what should we call them? :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2015, 6:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283/181 "2015-11-05T06:20:35Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> MrDibble :“_If you’re unfamiliar with the contents of the work of Rushton and Lynn…_”

Yes, and…? Is English not your first language? “The work of Rushton and Lynn” can mean “The work of Rushton and Lynn together” (though I’m unaware of why that means Jensen to you, did you confuse your racists?) _or_ “The work of Rushton and the work of Lynn, collectively (i.e. Pioneer Fund racist Dreck)”. Plus, AFAIK, Rushton and Flynn never co-authored any papers.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-hate-speech-really-not-banned-on-the-boards/736283.md?page=10)
