I do agree that this is weak tea for the Pit, but (1) the original GD discussion spanned a couple of old threads, (2) I didn’t think it merited opening it’s own new GD discussion, and (3) Uzi is essentially correct. It is intended as an indictment of the general style and merits of the assertions of, and the overall level of predictive accuracy of, a specific poster in regards to economic or fiscal issues.
And a discussion on that last point certainly wouldn’t be a great debate.