Is it a violation to mock and insult someone...

[simster]

@C_K_Dexter_Haven

.The dream would be recorded on your iPhone (you didn’t know they do that?) and our dream-extensions (“the dream moderators”) would take actions to erase the dream.

What a cheap trick.

[Drunky_Smurf]

@kayaker

Well, as a matter of fact, I’m feeling despondency and sorrow from Ms Sirtis.

You should sue her.

[Accidental_Martyr]

@Tangent

Whew–that’s a relief! I was afraid we’d pissed off Marina Sirtis.

…or Maggie Gyllenhaal.

[John_Mace]

@GrandWino

Time to shut down the internet then.

I knew that thing would never last!

[BigT]

@C_K_Dexter_Haven

The dream would be recorded on your iPhone (you didn’t know they do that?) and our dream-extensions (“the dream moderators”) would take actions to erase the dream.

I really wish you mods wouldn’t do that. If no one likes it, the dream will fall to the bottom and disappear from our memories by itself.

[C_K_Dexter_Haven]

@BigT

I really wish you mods wouldn’t do that. If no one likes it, the dream will fall to the bottom and disappear from our memories by itself.

It’s not that no one likes your dream, it’s that you have over 150,000 viewers every Tuesday night.

[Acsenray]

@jimbuff314

Hmm. I am a bit concerned here. Could mocking/insulting someone who is a celebrity (or reasonable facsimile thereof) lead to slander/defamation lawsuits against this board? Not trying to stir anything up, getting clarification due to relatively recent events. Er, relatively recently re-started events seven years after the initial fact.

Or is it something like “If they (said celebrity) call the board on it, the thread will be closed down?”

The board itself is likely protected by a safe harbor provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. However, that doesn’t mean that a legitimate defamation claim would necessarily go for naught. If the complainant makes a prima facie case for defamation, then it’s likely that he or she can get a subpoena to force the SDMB or any intervening ISPs to divulge any contact information that they have.

Note that “insulting” by itself is not defamation. Defamation is

1. A claim of fact
2. That is false
3. Whose falsity is intentional or the result of negligence (in the case of a public figure that is made with actual malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth).
4. Made in public
5. That tends to harm the good name or reputation of the person about which the claim is made

Note that opinions are not defamatory. Neither are true claims of fact.

[rsa]

This story, Kentucky blogger beats McConnell, gets back his YouTube clip, concerns fair use of copyrighted material, not defamation claims, but was resolved by YouTube within three weeks.

[Siam_Sam]

@Acsenray

The board itself is likely protected by a safe harbor provided by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. However, that doesn’t mean that a legitimate defamation claim would necessarily go for naught. If the complainant makes a prima facie case for defamation, then it’s likely that he or she can get a subpoena to force the SDMB or any intervening ISPs to divulge any contact information that they have.

Note that “insulting” by itself is not defamation. Defamation is

1. A claim of fact
2. That is false
3. Whose falsity is intentional or the result of negligence (in the case of a public figure that is made with actual malice or with a reckless disregard for the truth).
4. Made in public
5. That tends to harm the good name or reputation of the person about which the claim is made

Note that opinions are not defamatory. Neither are true claims of fact.

You could sue in a Thai court. Even if the claim is true, the law here will find you guilty of defamation if it can be proved the insultee suffered from any loss as a result. This is why – and I’m not kidding – you never EVER see a bad restaurant review in Thailand, because reviewers get the hell sued out of them for negative reviews and lose every time.