# Is it ethical that all of celebrity's dirty laundry is exposed for all to see?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 13, 2010, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405 "2010-03-13T23:53:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tethered\_Kite](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a5b964/32.png) [@Tethered\_Kite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tethered_Kite)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2010, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405/41 "2010-03-16T21:58:05Z")

</div>

This thread put me in mind of historical royalty and the various lacks of freedom some of them acknowledged because of their responsibilities to “their people.” Whom they could marry, if they could marry, what church they belonged to, if they could leave a church. Bigtime sacrifices for their standing.

I’m also in thought of when clergy, educators, and other types of social leaders were held to high standards in the hopes that “good” people would make “good” decisions.

Perhaps with time the concept of responsibility to others will be an archaeic concept altogether.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nobody](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/94ad74/32.png) [@Nobody](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nobody)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2010, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405/42 "2010-03-16T22:24:14Z")

</div>

> [@Rumor\_Watkins](#):
>
> “celebrities” derive their wealth from the fact that the people are interested in their lives. this includes the dirty sides of their lives.
> 
> they simultaneously want to bitch about the invasion of their privacy but lap it up when people shell out significant premiums to see these same people?
> 
> you can’t have one without the other, imho.

Why shouldn’t they have control over what they want the public to see and not see about themselves? What’s wrong with saying, “Hey everybody, I’m in a new movie, check it out.” And, “The divorce that I’m going through is private and personal and I hope you respect that.” ?

Why does the fact that these people go out into the spotlight give tabloids the right to go through celebrities garbage or bribe people for dirt, or in any other way find out things about the celebrity that the celebrity doesn’t want people to know. Unless it’s somehow connected to something harmful, I.E. a celebrity endorses a product they know is dangerous, or profits in a way that exploits or hurts people, what business is it of ours who they sleep with, who they have affairs with, whether or not they sunbathe nude, any secret weddings they may have. Whatever. If it doesn’t hurt anyone, then what gives us the right to know about it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 16, 2010, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405/43 "2010-03-16T23:23:09Z")

</div>

> [@Rumor\_Watkins](#):
>
> “celebrities” derive their wealth from the fact that the people are interested in their lives. this includes the dirty sides of their lives.
> 
> they simultaneously want to bitch about the invasion of their privacy but lap it up when people shell out significant premiums to see these same people?
> 
> you can’t have one without the other, imho.

Plenty of people are celebrities and private. Celebrities have PR agents, who can get your name in the press or keep your name out of the press. You can also avoid doing things that would be all over the country club if you weren’t a celebrity, and all over the world if you are.

Tom Hanks is a celebrity. Tom Hanks has plenty of money. When he got divorced, after a long marriage, it got maybe half an inch on page 15. You don’t have to turn on the publicity spigot, but once you do, you can’t turn it off when you feel like it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ethical-that-all-of-celebritys-dirty-laundry-is-exposed-for-all-to-see/532405.md?page=2)
