# Is it OK to be an \[Athenian\] idiot?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606
**Category:** Great Debates
**Created:** [July 22, 2010, 3:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606 "2010-07-22T15:34:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Stoneburg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@Stoneburg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoneburg)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 3:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/1 "2010-07-22T15:34:29Z")

</div>

Now obviously I am using the word ‘idiot’ in its original Athenian sense:

> [@](#):
>
> Declining to take part in public life, such as democratic government of the polis (city state)

OK or not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cosmosdan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a6a055/32.png) [@cosmosdan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cosmosdan)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/2 "2010-07-22T15:37:04Z")

</div>

Dan…Dan…Don’t …do it.  
[whew that was close}

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/3 "2010-07-22T15:41:15Z")

</div>

This would be a finer republic, I suppose, if the idiots-in-the-vernacular-sense would also be idiots-in-the-classical-sense, and mind just their own business and not society’s . . .

[Some take that idea even further.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=571701)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/4 "2010-07-22T16:12:38Z")

</div>

I added the word to clarify the meaning of the thread title. I probably should have clarified it further but I couldn’t pass up a chance at wordplay. Now where is my bouzouki?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Beware\_of\_Doug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/278dde/32.png) [@Beware\_of\_Doug](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beware_of_Doug)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/5 "2010-07-22T16:28:41Z")

</div>

_Don’t wanna be an Athenian idiot  
Don’t wanna live in a tub like Diogenes  
I care too much for the world and its progeny  
Everyone in the agora is part o’ me_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/6 "2010-07-22T16:56:40Z")

</div>

Well, now that the obvious has been taken care of…  
…sure, if you want to abstain from voluntary public involvement, go ahead. Involuntary obligations, such as paying taxes and showing up when called for jury duty, remain, though.

Of course, you’ll still have the right to complain about things, but everyone will have even less reason to take you seriously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/7 "2010-07-22T18:16:53Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, now that the obvious has been taken care of…  
> …sure, if you want to abstain from voluntary public involvement, go ahead. Involuntary obligations, such as paying taxes and showing up when called for jury duty, remain, though.

I agree.

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Of course, you’ll still have the right to complain about things, but everyone will have even less reason to take you seriously.

Why? I mean, doesn’t this presume that the mere act of taking part in the involvement is, alone, a positive reason to take your complaints seriously? I’ve seen too many idiots\* that aren’t idiots\*\* to think this is the case.

- modern usage  
\*\* athenian usage

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 7:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/8 "2010-07-22T19:03:31Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> Why? I mean, doesn’t this presume that the mere act of taking part in the involvement is, alone, a positive reason to take your complaints seriously? I’ve seen too many idiots\* that aren’t idiots\*\* to think this is the case.

Well, let’s say it’s a scale of default values of how seriously someone’s complaints should be taken, subject to numerous additional modifiers.

0 - non-voter  
1 - voter  
10 - local elected official or judge  
20 - state/provincial elected official or judge  
40 - federal elected official or judge  
100 - President/Prime Minister/Supreme Court Justice

The modifiers add a plus-or-minus of 100 points, typically based on how much you like and trust the complainer, the complainer’s possible history of crankery or pandering, how much the complainer’s complaints strike you as plausible, etc. If a fellow voter had some complaints, I might commiserate with him, share some observations and complaints of my own. If somebody came out with the same complaints and tacked on “…and that’s why I never vote”, I doubt I’d bother to get even that chummy with him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/9 "2010-07-22T19:05:23Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, let’s say it’s a scale of default values of how seriously someone’s complaints should be taken, subject to numerous additional modifiers.
> 
> 0 - non-voter  
> 1 - voter  
> 10 - local elected official or judge  
> 20 - state/provincial elected official or judge  
> 40 - federal elected official or judge  
> 100 - President/Prime Minister/Supreme Court Justice
> 
> The modifiers add a plus-or-minus of 100 points, typically based on how much you like and trust the complainer, the complainer’s possible history of crankery or pandering, how much the complainer’s complaints strike you as plausible, etc. If a fellow voter had some complaints, I might commiserate with him, share some observations and complaints of my own. If somebody came out with the same complaints and tacked on “…and that’s why I never vote”, I doubt I’d bother to get even that chummy with him.

Don’t you think there should be room for more gradations between 0 and 1?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/10 "2010-07-22T19:08:54Z")

</div>

Well, you have my permission to adapt the Ekers Scale of Default Political Respect, which I now freely and unreservedly release into the public domain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Attack\_from\_the\_3rd\_dimension](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@Attack\_from\_the\_3rd\_dimension](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Attack_from_the_3rd_dimension)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/11 "2010-07-22T19:14:23Z")

</div>

> [@Beware\_of\_Doug](#):
>
> _Don’t wanna be an Athenian idiot  
> Don’t wanna live in a tub like Diogenes  
> I care too much for the world and its progeny  
> Everyone in the agora is part o’ me_

Weirdest earworm I’ve ever had.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/12 "2010-07-22T20:13:56Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, let’s say it’s a scale of default values of how seriously someone’s complaints should be taken, subject to numerous additional modifiers.
> 
> 0 - non-voter  
> 1 - voter  
> 10 - local elected official or judge  
> 20 - state/provincial elected official or judge  
> 40 - federal elected official or judge  
> 100 - President/Prime Minister/Supreme Court Justice
> 
> The modifiers add a plus-or-minus of 100 points, typically based on how much you like and trust the complainer, the complainer’s possible history of crankery or pandering, how much the complainer’s complaints strike you as plausible, etc. If a fellow voter had some complaints, I might commiserate with him, share some observations and complaints of my own. If somebody came out with the same complaints and tacked on “…and that’s why I never vote”, I doubt I’d bother to get even that chummy with him.

So the difference between 0 and 1 is the difference between “not even bothering to get that chummy” and “commisserate and discuss”, what does that make 100? Abject worship? Either that scale’s logarithmic or I’m pretty sure it’s hyperbole.

Also I asked _why_ is their opinion to be taken as less meritous? You’ve made it clear that not voting is a sufficiently ad-hominemable offense to make everything they say disregardable as a result; what part of not voting makes it so?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/13 "2010-07-22T21:40:03Z")

</div>

You’re asking for definitive expansions on something I wrote off-the-cuff and which included qualifiers like “might” and “doubt”. Suffice it to say that I have little sympathy for people who complain about the system yet won’t make the minimal effort of occasionally casting a vote.

And, no, I don’t “abjectly worship” the 100-levels. I don’t abjectly worship anything. However, if a 100-level raises an objection to how things are done, I’m quite likely to pay attention since the 100s are the people at the top of the power structure and thus most likely to effect change. The change may not be to my personal liking, of course.

Anyway, if you don’t like the scale, rewrite it to your heart’s content.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/14 "2010-07-22T21:49:19Z")

</div>

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> You’re asking for definitive expansions on something I wrote off-the-cuff and which included qualifiers like “might” and “doubt”. Suffice it to say that I have little sympathy for people who complain about the system yet won’t make the minimal effort of occasionally casting a vote.
> 
> And, no, I don’t “abjectly worship” the 100-levels. I don’t abjectly worship anything. However, if a 100-level raises an objection to how things are done, I’m quite likely to pay attention since the 100s are the people at the top of the power structure and thus most likely to effect change. The change may not be to my personal liking, of course.
> 
> Anyway, if you don’t like the scale, rewrite it to your heart’s content.

Okay, I’ll rewrite it:  
0 - non-voter  
0 - voter  
-1 - local elected official or judge  
-10 - state/provincial elected official or judge  
-15 - federal elected official or judge  
-25 - President/Prime Minister/Supreme Court Justice

The ‘rank’ a figure has in a political system doesn’t inherently make their opinions any better, but it _does_ increase their ability to do something about it. As you say, they’re most likely to effect change, so why are they just whining about it? They should _do something_.

Whereas by comparison, the voter and non-voter are equally powerless. Yeah yeah, the voter had a fraction of a tenth of an iota of minimal influence as to which polician was elected. That doesn’t mean that he has any power to do anything _now_. And it doesn’t mean that his opinions -or complaints- are any smarter or more correct or more justified than those of the guy who didn’t vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/15 "2010-07-22T22:31:20Z")

</div>

Offhand, I’m going to say it’s not okay to be a classical idiot. All of us benefit from living in our society. But society requires the collective support of its citizens. So an idiot is somebody who is receving the benefits without offering the support.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2010, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/16 "2010-07-22T22:35:33Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> Offhand, I’m going to say it’s not okay to be a classical idiot. All of us benefit from living in our society. But society requires the collective support of its citizens. So an idiot is somebody who is receving the benefits without offering the support.

What if the idiot pays taxes, refrains from murdering, etc, and basically does everything to collectively support society but vote?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Stoneburg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df705f/32.png) [@Stoneburg](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoneburg)
#### Post date: [July 26, 2010, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/17 "2010-07-26T21:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> > [@Little\_Nemo](#):
> >
> > Offhand, I’m going to say it’s not okay to be a classical idiot. All of us benefit from living in our society. But society requires the collective support of its citizens. So an idiot is somebody who is receving the benefits without offering the support.
> 
> What if the idiot pays taxes, refrains from murdering, etc, and basically does everything to collectively support society but vote?

Paying taxes and not murdering people is required. You will be met with violence if you attempt not to pay taxes, or if you attempt to murder someone. You don’t get extra democratic credits for NOT breaking the law. It’s both expected and demanded.  
The reason for the OP is that it irks me when people say they don’t “care” about politics, when they live in a democracy. I believe that in a democracy you have a personal responsibility to care and be involved on some level. The absolute minimum level being to vote. A Democracy means that the people rule the country, either through the representatives they chose or directly through votes on issues. Living in a democracy is a privilige that most people don’t have, and by not caring you’re taking for granted something that the vast majority of people who ever lived never had. And your shirking your responsibility.

I also think (or hope) that in most cases, it’s not true. People usually care at least about stuff that affects them. And politics affects almost every aspect of almost every peoples lives. If I am to give these (athenian) idiots the benefit of doubt, I will assume that they mean they’re not interested in the partisan _game_ of politics.

This has become more relevant right now since it’s election time here. And frankly, the political parties aren’t helping this issue because of the relationship with the electorate. More and more the elections become a pandering to voters, instead of a democratic attempt at dialogue. Different parties will try to “buy” different demographic groups by offering tax cuts, programs or rethoric that they think will convince them to vote for them. The electors are being “wooed”. We’re using PR-firms for “branding” and “priming” instead of challenging eachothers ideas. We’re trying to package our ideology instead of putting the responsibility were it belongs, at the feet of the electorate.

People should be actively involved. Everyone should be. Everyone with the right to vote should at the very least be trying to find information, thinking, discussing and weighing alternatives. But because us politicians are so concerned about winning, we chicken out. The voters should be challenging politicians, but politicians should be challenging voters too, not just sucking up to them. We’re not selling a product, we’re collectively deciding how to run the country. If you refuse to accept your responsibility in making that decision because you’re lazy, you’re an over priviliged idiot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)
#### Post date: [July 26, 2010, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/18 "2010-07-26T21:34:34Z")

</div>

> [@Stoneburg](#):
>
> > [@begbert2](#):
> >
> > > [@Little\_Nemo](#):
> > >
> > > Offhand, I’m going to say it’s not okay to be a classical idiot. All of us benefit from living in our society. But society requires the collective support of its citizens. So an idiot is somebody who is receving the benefits without offering the support.
> > 
> > What if the idiot pays taxes, refrains from murdering, etc, and basically does everything to collectively support society but vote?
> 
> Paying taxes and not murdering people is required. You will be met with violence if you attempt not to pay taxes, or if you attempt to murder someone. You don’t get extra democratic credits for NOT breaking the law. It’s both expected and demanded.  
> The reason for the OP is that it irks me when people say they don’t “care” about politics, when they live in a democracy. I believe that in a democracy you have a personal responsibility to care and be involved on some level. The absolute minimum level being to vote. A Democracy means that the people rule the country, either through the representatives they chose or directly through votes on issues. Living in a democracy is a privilige that most people don’t have, and by not caring you’re taking for granted something that the vast majority of people who ever lived never had. And your shirking your responsibility.
> 
> I also think (or hope) that in most cases, it’s not true. People usually care at least about stuff that affects them. And politics affects almost every aspect of almost every peoples lives. If I am to give these (athenian) idiots the benefit of doubt, I will assume that they mean they’re not interested in the partisan _game_ of politics.
> 
> This has become more relevant right now since it’s election time here. And frankly, the political parties aren’t helping this issue because of the relationship with the electorate. More and more the elections become a pandering to voters, instead of a demcratic dialogue-attempt. Different parties will try to “buy” different demographic groups by offering tax cuts, programs or rethoric that they think will convince them to vote. The electors are being “wooed”. We’re using PR-firms for “branding” and “priming” instead of challenging eachothers ideas. We’re trying to package our ideology instead of putting the responsibility were it belongs, at the feet of the electorate.
> 
> People should be actively involved. Everyone should be. Everyone with the right to vote should at the very least be trying to find information, thinking, discussing and weighing alternatives. But because us politicians are so concerned about winning, we chicken out. The voters should be challenging politicians, but politicians should be challenging voters too, not just sucking up to them. We’re not selling a product, we’re collectively deciding how to run the country. If you refuse to accept your responsibility in making that decision because you’re lazy, you’re an over priviliged idiot.

I don’t think I know _a single person_ in my area who tries to find information, thinks, or discusses or weighs alternatives - the ones that vote do it by color. Red red red, for generally poorly-thought-out reasons, usually involving single issues and collections thereof.

I presume they’re equally idiotic? Or is there something less idiotic about voting idiotically?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Maggie\_the\_Ocelot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@Maggie\_the\_Ocelot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maggie_the_Ocelot)
#### Post date: [July 26, 2010, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/19 "2010-07-26T21:38:38Z")

</div>

Can I get a cite for the original quote?

The reason is, in my American Government class (1 semester, required for all Seniors, and basically a “rah rah this is why Amurrika is the best” period of inanity), the teacher gave us a bit on our homework that said, basically, that in Ancient Greece _idiotes_, the root of our word “idiot” was what they called someone who didn’t vote, and what did we think of that? Of course, we were supposed to say “You have to be an idiot to not vote!!”, but I did a little research - from what I could tell, _idiotes_ referred not to someone who DID not vote, but from someone who was considered “mentally defective” and was therefore NOT PERMITTED to vote.

So I pointed this out, and mentioned that while it may seem logical to only allow those of a certain mental level to take part in the franchise, intelligence tests for the right to vote had historically been used to disempower minority voters and had therefore been struck down by the Supreme Court.

Anyway, to repeat: Can I get a cite on this usage?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)
#### Post date: [July 26, 2010, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606/20 "2010-07-26T21:47:31Z")

</div>

> [@Maggie\_the\_Ocelot](#):
>
> Can I get a cite for the original quote?
> 
> The reason is, in my American Government class (1 semester, required for all Seniors, and basically a “rah rah this is why Amurrika is the best” period of inanity), the teacher gave us a bit on our homework that said, basically, that in Ancient Greece _idiotes_, the root of our word “idiot” was what they called someone who didn’t vote, and what did we think of that? Of course, we were supposed to say “You have to be an idiot to not vote!!”, but I did a little research - from what I could tell, _idiotes_ referred not to someone who DID not vote, but from someone who was considered “mentally defective” and was therefore NOT PERMITTED to vote.
> 
> So I pointed this out, and mentioned that while it may seem logical to only allow those of a certain mental level to take part in the franchise, intelligence tests for the right to vote had historically been used to disempower minority voters and had therefore been struck down by the Supreme Court.
> 
> Anyway, to repeat: Can I get a cite on this usage?

[Wikipedia says:](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot#History)

> [@](#):
>
> “Idiot” originally referred to “layman, person lacking professional skill”, “person so mentally deficient as to be incapable of ordinary reasoning”. Declining to take part in public life, such as democratic government of the polis (city state), such as the Athenian democracy, was considered dishonorable. “Idiots” were seen as having bad judgment in public and political matters. Over time, the term “idiot” shifted away from its original connotation of selfishness and came to refer to individuals with overall bad judgment–individuals who are “stupid”. In modern English usage, the terms “idiot” and “idiocy” describe an extreme folly or stupidity, and its symptoms (foolish or stupid utterance or deed). In psychology, it is a historical term for the state or condition now called profound mental retardation.[1]
> 
> Idiot as a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs (“person lacking professional skill,” “a private citizen,” “individual”), from ἴδιος, idios (“private,” “one’s own”).[2] In Latin the word idiota (“ordinary person, layman”) preceded the Late Latin meaning “uneducated or ignorant person.”[3] Its modern meaning and form dates back to Middle English around the year 1300, from the Old French idiote (“uneducated or ignorant person”). The related word idiocy dates to 1487 and may have been analogously modeled on the words prophet[4] and prophecy.[5][6] The word has cognates in many other languages.

[Also:](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot_(Athenian_democracy))

> [@](#):
>
> An idiot in Athenian democracy was someone who was characterized by self-centeredness and concerned almost exclusively with private–as opposed to public–affairs.[1] Idiocy was the natural state of ignorance into which all persons were born and its opposite, citizenship, was effected through formalized education.[1] In Athenian democracy, idiots were born and citizens were made through education (although citizenship was also largely hereditary).
> 
> Today, educators and political scientists increasingly resurrect this terminology’s etymological origins in order to discuss a growing major problem with modern American republican democracy: self-centeredness. They do so in order to understand the major modern problem in American participatory government in apathy in distinguishing between its underlying causes: idiocy (self-centeredness) and alienation.

FYI, [“idiom” has the same root – _idios_ (one’s own).](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiom)[So does “idiosyncrasy.”](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiosyncracy)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-ok-to-be-an-athenian-idiot/547606.md?page=2)
