# Is it possible to determine who is responsible for the largest number of replies across all threads?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [September 16, 2026, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111 "2026-09-16T14:46:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![commasense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/commasense/32/3017_2.png) [@commasense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/commasense)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2026, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/1 "2026-09-16T14:46:35Z")

</div>

We have a number of threads that have exceeded the 10,000-post limit and gone on to Parts 2, 3, 4, and more. IMHO, even if the OP of the initial thread didn’t actively start the follow-on threads, they are responsible for all the posts in all the threads that followed.

So the question that comes to mind (my mind, at least, such as it is) is, which Doper has created threads that have the highest combined total post count?

Is there a way that could be calculated and determined?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2026, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/2 "2026-09-16T20:58:39Z")

</div>

At a _quick_ glance through the tools I have available, I don’t see anything that would easily work. I’d have to probably do it manually, the same way you would - track the 10k plus threads (using that as a rule-of-thumb cutoff), find the op, jot them down, repeat. Which in a way could be a reasonably fun thing to do and research.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reply](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/reply/32/15952_2.png) [@Reply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reply)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 4:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/3 "2026-09-17T04:39:51Z")

</div>

If you’re really curious (and the mods are OK with this), I could write a script to do the manual work that ParallelLines would’ve done by hand — unless they _want_ to do it by hand 😅

It wouldn’t need any special access, just start from something like [the top topics](https://boards.straightdope.com/c/about-this-message-board/8/l/top?period=all) (or the [machine readable JSON version](https://boards.straightdope.com/c/about-this-message-board/8/l/top.json?period=all) of the same), look up each one’s OP and tabulate the replies, and then paginate through the topics list until we’re statistically pretty certain that probably there isn’t a long tail (of like some poster who miraculously made a few thousand topics with only a couple replies each). (Edit: Actually, Claude noticed that [https://boards.straightdope.com/about.json](https://boards.straightdope.com/about.json) says we have about 28 replies per topic on average, so the long tail DOES matter here and shouldn’t be ignored.)

It would be a “polite”, well-behaved crawler that shouldn’t cause any noticeable load on the server, and it could sample pages until we build up a statistical confidence of our results, maybe stopping short of a full crawl. A full crawl wouldn’t be that bad anyway (since we’re fetching _metadata_ of topics, not all the replies within it) and would take maybe 2-3 hours total to do — mostly because we’re just trying to be polite to the server.

Let me know if you want me to build this.

Also… if we actually had a board admin that was still active (i.e. a user with SQL access to the Data Explorer Discourse plugin), it would take a few seconds instead of a few hours… sadly I don’t think we do ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/4 "2026-09-17T04:56:44Z")

</div>

I have the least experience with the tools, so there may be a better way to do it. I certainly don’t have the time or energy to do it justice, well, maybe at the end of the month when I’m doing a dual Flu/Covid vax, but I’m normally quite under the weather after that.

I suspect that there’d be enough privacy/liability concerns with even the most benevolent crawler for TPTB to be extra cautious with such, absent a greater need than our (unquenchable) curiosity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reply](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/reply/32/15952_2.png) [@Reply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reply)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/5 "2026-09-17T05:09:45Z")

</div>

To be clear, the crawler wouldn’t access any private data at all. It wouldn’t even be logged in, much less have any sort of special permission. It’s just looking at the topics lists that any other person or bot could see, malicious or otherwise — I’m sure far worse have already tried, and we’re already all in AI training sets, for better or worse =/

But, still… I made a similar, presumptuous (and arrogant, yeesh, I was such an ass back then 😅) dismissal when I was younger here: [A browser addon that embeds SDMB user portraits into threads?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/a-browser-addon-that-embeds-sdmb-user-portraits-into-threads/554618)

I won’t make that mistake again. People can get nervous about their privacy, so if there’s a concern about it, probably better to just respect them.

Besides… it’s all about quality, not quantity, right? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/6 "2026-09-17T05:14:04Z")

</div>

> [@Reply](#):
>
> But, still… I made a similar, presumptuous (and arrogant, yeesh, I was such an ass back then 😅) dismissal when I was younger here:

He says, pointing to a post from 2010, while I have only been posting since 2020. And meanwhile the 99’ers look down upon us from the lofty heights of epic senority!

Seriously, I absolutely believe your best intentions and question them not at all. Just that we tend to be very cautious, exactly as you suggest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reply](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/reply/32/15952_2.png) [@Reply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reply)\
**Post date:** [September 17, 2026, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-possible-to-determine-who-is-responsible-for-the-largest-number-of-replies-across-all-threads/1033111/7 "2026-09-17T05:44:03Z")

</div>

Well, if the knee PT earlier today didn’t do it, _now_ I certainly feel old 😉 Though I’m not really; I just started posting here as a teenager, and a lurker for even longer before then. It’s been a while!

> [@ParallelLines](#):
>
> Just that we tend to be very cautious, exactly as you suggest.

If the SDMB (and internet at large) has taught me anything, it’s that even the best of intentions are rarely read as such online. People will often default to the _least_ charitable interpretation. Something about the facelessness of pseudonymous texts on a message board, I guess?🤷

Anyway, the OP’s question is interesting enough in its own right, but not worth a possible uproar over. Maybe someday when we’re all dead, our kids and AIs will make a SDMB museum where this can all be calculated and preserved as a part of early internet lore…
