# Is it too early to say Romney has lost?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [September 18, 2012, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066 "2012-09-18T13:26:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MsWhatsit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/eb8c5e/32.png) [@MsWhatsit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MsWhatsit)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/622 "2012-10-11T14:31:42Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> It doesn’t “stand for” anything, it’s just a country. What does France or Britain or Japan stand for?

Surrendering, tea, and tentacle porn, respectively.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tarwater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9de0a6/32.png) [@Tarwater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tarwater)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/623 "2012-10-11T15:12:17Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Having watched Biden, I think he’ll do well, but evisceration isn’t his thing. He’s a serious man who talks seriously about policy. I think the Ryan-Biden debate will be the most informative of the debates, but it’s unlikely to be a fight so much as a seminar.

I think he’ll do well, too. One of the reasons Biden is known for making gaffes is because he’s a lively speaker unafraid of making extemporaneous comments. That kind of speech works well in a debate, and I imagine it will allow him to draw the debate to a close tie, even when Ryan comes across as the more articulate of the two.

I disagree, obviously, that the debate will be less a fight than a seminar. I think the Romney campaign can smell the blood in the water, and they’ll be looking to extend their momentum through Ryan’s performance. The Obama campaign, on the other hand, understands that they can’t afford another poor debate. And while it’s true that vice presidential debates haven’t had a tremendous amount of influence on the polls in previous elections, I think this one will be different, and I think both campaigns know it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/624 "2012-10-11T15:22:14Z")

</div>

Biden will do well. He’s extremely knowledgeable and he has done well in debates before. If he does nothing more than point out the lying and hypocrisy of the $700 billion Medicare lie and the utter impossibility of finding enough deductions among the wealthy to pay for Romney’s tax cut, I’ll be quite pleased.

Obams’s performance was like Apollo Creed’s early rounds in Rocky. Surely someone in the Obama corner has pointed out that his opponent doesn’t think he’s in a show, he thinks he’s in a fight. So let’s stop with the Debbie Downer stuff, Obama will do fine in the next two debates and win the election.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/625 "2012-10-11T15:26:21Z")

</div>

> [@MsWhatsit](#):
>
> Surrendering, tea, and tentacle porn, respectively.

It’s even on their national coats of arms.

Or should be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lantern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d26b3c/32.png) [@Lantern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lantern)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/626 "2012-10-11T16:59:57Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> However, with Romney up 1.5 nationally now, it’s doubtful that Obama will maintain leads in Ohio or Virginia.
> 
> Either Romney must fall behind in the national polls, or Obama must fall behind in the swing state polls. Romney will not win by 1.5 points and lose the electoral vote.

Nate actually has a long [post](http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/oct-10-is-romney-leading-right-now/?)on this exact issue of state versus national polls. He suggests a range of possibilities and mentions a number of reasons why state polls may sometimes be better than national polls when the two diverge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiddle\_Peghead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddle_peghead/32/3506_2.png) [@Fiddle\_Peghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiddle_Peghead)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/627 "2012-10-11T17:13:25Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> However, with Romney up 1.5 nationally now, it’s doubtful that Obama will maintain leads in Ohio or Virginia.

Eh, Silver has Obama up by 1.6, so don’t start counting any chickens just yet.

ETA: Also, why make a statement like that with 27 or whatever days out?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Belowjob2.0](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Belowjob2.0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Belowjob2.0)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/628 "2012-10-11T17:22:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Obams’s performance was like Apollo Creed’s early rounds in Rocky. Surely someone in the Obama corner has pointed out that his opponent doesn’t think he’s in a show, he thinks he’s in a fight. So let’s stop with the Debbie Downer stuff, Obama will do fine in the next two debates and win the election.

Will he?

In the debates, Obama may be too far behind overall to catch up. This could be similar to Hilary’s loss in the 2008 primary. She fell behind, in a race that was tailor made for her, and couldn’t catch up because Obama continued to press his advantage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiddle\_Peghead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddle_peghead/32/3506_2.png) [@Fiddle\_Peghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiddle_Peghead)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/629 "2012-10-11T17:26:47Z")

</div>

> [@Belowjob2.0](#):
>
> Will he?
> 
> In the debates, Obama may be too far behind overall to catch up. This could be similar to Hilary’s loss in the 2008 primary. She fell behind, in a race that was tailor made for her, and couldn’t catch up because Obama continued to press his advantage.

What do you mean by “In the debates” he may be too far behind? Because surely you don’t think he’s too far behind in the current polling to come back, do you? Hell, depending on where you look, he’s not behind at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/630 "2012-10-11T17:48:15Z")

</div>

Even if Obama’s slipped to either allow Romney to close the gap or fall behind, I think people’s expectations of Obama-- both on the left and right as well as those in the middle-- have fallen because of the first debate. However, any real net positive in the upcoming debates for Obama will be multiplied because as of now, people have sort of come to expect him not to do well. If he does better than last time, people will remember that he actually \*isn’t \*a stoned-looking, lazy, rambling pansy. He’s the fucking president. If Obama does better than he did in the first debate, I expect the polls and forecasts to jump back in favor of Obama. Maybe not to pre-Denver levels, but they’ll jump pretty significantly away from Romney again.

With these debates, it’s all about expectations, and how the candidates meet them. No one expected much from Romney in the first debate, and most people expected more from Obama. Combine the fact that Obama disappointed with the fact that Romney didn’t fall on his face, and what you get is one of the biggest post-debate jumps in recent memory. Now that the public’s expectations are reversed, if Obama does better than last time, even moderately, we’ll be back to saying Romney’s toast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/631 "2012-10-11T17:52:02Z")

</div>

… and we’ll still be wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Lendervedder](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_lendervedder/32/8488_2.png) [@Happy\_Lendervedder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Lendervedder)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/632 "2012-10-11T17:53:16Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> … and we’ll still be wrong.

Probably not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gangster\_Octopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a8b319/32.png) [@Gangster\_Octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gangster_Octopus)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/633 "2012-10-11T18:00:05Z")

</div>

What would be awesome if there was like one big poll taken on just one day with millions of people and we all agreed that the result of that poll would be the winner. we could do it in some sort of state-weighted way if we so desired.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Belowjob2.0](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Belowjob2.0](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Belowjob2.0)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/634 "2012-10-11T18:05:13Z")

</div>

> [@Fiddle\_Peghead](#):
>
> What do you mean by “In the debates” he may be too far behind? Because surely you don’t think he’s too far behind in the current polling to come back, do you? Hell, depending on where you look, he’s not behind at all.

Romney’s a relatively strong debater, Obama’s a relatively weak one.

Obama tries hard to do better, and does, but is still bested by Romney, who’s riding a surge of confidence. (A confident, sincere liar is tough beat in the short run. It takes time for people to see through him.) Obama loses all three debates by not being able to produce a definitive victory in any of them.

Advantage Romney, and it’s too close to the election to create any other narrative. The first debate ends up being the last word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JoelUpchurch](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f05b48/32.png) [@JoelUpchurch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JoelUpchurch)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/635 "2012-10-11T18:30:53Z")

</div>

The people that think that a Romney presidency would lead to a theocracy haven’t looked at what Romney actually did as governor of Massachusetts. Romney may be lying, but he is probably lying to the conservative base. He would be to the right of Obama, but to the left of George Bush.

People worrying about policy changes, should pay more attention to the Senate and the House. How much do you think Romney can actually change as long as Democrats control the Senate? What is Obama going to do if Republicans take control of the Senate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/636 "2012-10-11T18:40:57Z")

</div>

> [@JoelUpchurch](#):
>
> How much do you think Romney can actually change as long as Democrats control the Senate? What is Obama going to do if Republicans take control of the Senate?

Probably fodder for a different thread, but off the top of my head…

Obama presidency:  
Liberal judges  
Less likely go to war with Iran  
No torture  
Potentially pass immigration reform  
Probably will not extend Bush tax cuts  
Will probably keep all discretionary spending stable  
Will keep Obamacare  
Will implement Dodd-Frank  
Will implement CFPB  
Will implement CO2 regulations  
Romney presidency:  
Conservative judges  
More likely go to war with Iran  
Reinstitute torture  
Doesn’t believe in immigration reform  
Probably will extend Bush tax cuts  
Will probably cut non-defense discretionary spending but increase defense  
Will repeal Obamacare through waivers and ending regulatory process  
Will make Dodd-Frank toothless through regulatory process  
Will not implement CFPB  
Will not implement CO2 regulations

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/637 "2012-10-11T19:07:41Z")

</div>

You left out, “Won’t have some froo-froo Portuguese First Dog” and “Will repeal imaginary Obama gun control legislation”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/638 "2012-10-11T19:34:39Z")

</div>

I would add:

Obama presidency:  
Signed Ledbetter Act  
Secured repeal of DADT  
Opposes constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage  
Supports _Roe v. Wade_  
Rescinded Global Gag Rule  
Supports and has funded green energy  
Supports and has funded stem cell research

Romney presidency:  
Opposes Ledbetter Act  
Opposed repeal of DADT  
Supports constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage  
Opposes _Roe v. Wade_ and supports constitutional amendment to override it  
Would reimpose Global Gag Rule  
Would cut funding for green energy  
Opposes and would cut funding for stem cell research

Give me time, and I’m sure I could think of more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/639 "2012-10-11T19:36:17Z")

</div>

I mean, if we’re coming up with genuine differences, we could fill pages. My list was just differences for which control of the Senate was largely irrelevant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/640 "2012-10-11T19:41:24Z")

</div>

I’m not sure how control of the Senate is irrelevant to the appointment of judges.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2012, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066/641 "2012-10-11T19:43:59Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> I’m not sure how control of the Senate is irrelevant to the appointment of judges.

Not irrelevant. Largely irrelevant. Whether there are 40 or 50 Republicans doesn’t make a great deal of difference in who Obama will appoint.

In other words, the difference between the next judge being more like Scalia and the next judge being more like Kagan is a matter of the Presidency, not the Senate.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066.md?page=31)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-too-early-to-say-romney-has-lost/635066.md?page=33)
