# Is it true that no state has to recognize a marriage from another state?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 17, 2004, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689 "2004-10-17T17:18:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2004, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689/1 "2004-10-17T17:18:29Z")

</div>

In his debate with Dick Cheney, John Edwards, in discussiing the anti-gay-marriage amendment, said that in all of American history no state has ever had to recognize a marriage contracted in another state. Is that true? For instance, when the Southern states had laws against interracial marriage, were they free to treat any interracial married couple from another state as not married in the eyes of the law? I thought the Constitutional clause about every state giving “full faith and credit” to every other state’s legal proceedings, etc., had some relevance here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2004, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689/2 "2004-10-17T17:29:19Z")

</div>

Nope. They don’t. Give me a second to dig up the Supreme Court case that dealt with that, but in effect, a state doesn’t have to recognise a marriage in another state if they don’t want to. The case involved “residency” requirements, so I don’t know if there is room for legal gymnastics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/bbe5ce/32.png) [@Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Otto)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2004, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689/3 "2004-10-17T18:18:05Z")

</div>

**silenus** I think you have it backwards. I believe states _are_ required to recognize marriages performed in other states unless the marriage violates the public policy of that state.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shoeless](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/shoeless/32/7099_2.png) [@Shoeless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shoeless)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2004, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689/4 "2004-10-17T18:28:27Z")

</div>

[An earlier thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=279509) on the same subject, with some good links.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cliffy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/59ef9b/32.png) [@Cliffy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cliffy)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2004, 4:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-true-that-no-state-has-to-recognize-a-marriage-from-another-state/269689/5 "2004-10-18T16:15:15Z")

</div>

Short answer: While the Full Faith & Credit Clause and principles of comity generally mean that a state will recognize marriages performed in another state, if the marriages in question are antithetical to the public policy of the target state, the target state is not _required_ to recognize them.

–Cliffy