Is Quantum Physics Proof of God?

[Exapno_Mapcase]

Since I, to my succeeding horror, brought it up, Liberal absolutely meant the proof to show the existence of his god. For that matter, Anselm absolutely did, and from my limited reading, so did most people who followed him. What abstruse realms modern philosophers put the proof into notwithstanding (or even irregardless, whose proof of existence I have written in the margin) I can’t say, but it is, so to speak, a goddamn proof of God.

I found an old thread, Explain the ontological argument to me that is fun to read. I don’t think you can top this post:

@Diogenes_the_Cynic

Yes. Your reaction to hearing it for the first time is normal. Most people with any sense read it, then say, “huh? That doesn’t sound right. It can’t be that stupid. I must have missed a step. What did I miss?” So they read it again, and there’s still no missed step. it really is that stupid. It can take a while for that to sink in, though. I too spent quite a bit of time assuming I must have misunderstood something the first time I encountered this in college. I cornered my philosophy prof about it and told him I though I was missing something. He told me that’s what everybody thinks the first time they see the OA, but that it really is as inane as it looks.